>A new class action lawsuit filed Thursday accuses WWE and ESPN of deceptive marketing practices with the move of PLEs to ESPN’s direct-to-consumer streaming service.>The complaint takes issue with how some fans who already get ESPN channels through cable or other providers were still required to pay an additional monthly fee to watch WWE events.>The plaintiffs allege this contradicts marketing communications from both WWE and ESPN, which they claim suggested all existing ESPN subscribers would have access to PLEs.>Source: POSTwrestlingEdrones get nickel-and-dimed nonstop by WWE and still defend the company lmao battered wife syndrome
>>19653977World Weinstein Epstein
>>19653977I do agree that the messaging was pretty confusing. WWE is basically the only exclusive content on ESPN Unlimited, and it was hard to even find mention of it on the website. Then we all thought we'd be able to log in with our cable info, but then only certain providers could do that. They're adding more now though so hopefully it'll stop being an issue and people will be able to stop paying for ESPN twice.
>>19653977Evil fucking companies
>It was estimated that "WWE content drove roughly 95,000 to 125,000 signups during the proposed class period."Lmaooooooooooo no one gives a fuck about eslop