Even after all this time I don’t get why Cole called him the best pure striker in the history of WWE? What even is a pure striker?
>>19701998You can either strike or grapple... his offense consists purely of strikesIt's an mma term, but I guess it can apply to pro-wrestling too... the funny thing is, slams are more entertaining than strikes. I think he was just too lazy to lift anyone at that point in his career
>>19701998
The purity of evil from The Ministry of Darkness days had been curtailed and channelled through his fists. He traded satanic garb for the mortal biker life and although he may not have dressed like Satan during these days, the strikes from his fists reminded you that he was still down with the devil.
>>19702137MMMMMM....now that's badass
>>19701998Have you never watched a Taker match? Outside of signature moves like old school or his flying clothesline, 99% of what he does is striking
>>19702032DAN sounds based as fuck
>>19701998It's one of those (many) cringe lines that likely came from Taker himself to put over how much of an epic badass he was.
>>19702032>includes steve austin and stone coldGood job JewPT
>>19701998I always thought it meant he was accurate, I don't know why people took it so weird.
>>19701998I don’t really get what is confusing. He used closed fisted punches as one of his spots and commentary put it over
