BIG DAVE FROM THE TOP ROPE
dave will not have sex with you for defending his honor 24/7 Trev
>>19709187Maxchads eating well, I will be seated for my big nigga's big debut tonight
>>19709187fedophiles sliding, as expected
>>19710598it's what they do
>>19709187when i think about the lives of grown men who argue with meltzer on twitter i feel a deep sadness
>>19709187Dave isn't alone, broke, or forgotten. Frankly, that's a pretty big W in his chosen profession, even if he's beclowned himself many times along the way.
The problem with this line of thinking is that Dave thinks demand for AEW is infinitely scalable. It’s a niche product. You can double the number of people who have access to it, it doesn’t mean that the viewership is guaranteed to double.
>>19712426do you not understand how ratings are calculated?
>A lot of people have max>so a lot of people must be watching aew on max!!!!Commie midwit logic
>>19712560Ratings is just shorthand for Viewers, you dumb cocksucker. If Dynamidget gets 100k viewers in the 18-49 demo, doesn't really matter if it's 0.11 or 0.09, 100k is 100k
>>19712616ok, so you really don't understand how ratings are calculated then?
>>19709187Max is included in the Nielsen ratings now and fucking nobody watches AEW on it.
>>1970918758 milly?! That many people are watching AEW DYNAMITE every fuckin week on HBO MAX now?! HOLY SHIT!! 58 MILLY!!!
>>19712616>shorthand for a word with the same number of lettersseek help>>19712711wrong
>>19712711MAX numbers are NOT included in Nielson ration you stupid bitch. They are just NOT. Try talking shit about AEW on MY 4chan board again and see what happens. I will motherfuckin KILL you and cook you like pork, you piggiE.
>>19712426Meltzer also assumes that every streamer has equal engagement. Netflix is used way more by people who have it than Max is used by the people who have it. Even Paramount punches well above its weight compared to MAX.
>>19712723"ratings" is understood to encapsulate multiple rating (singular) measurements including 18-49, 25-54, 18-34 and P2"viewers" implies you're only asking for the total viewers, not the sum total of individual segmentsit's not about the linguistic equivalent, it's about the industry jargon shortcut, you fucking retard. And yes Max numbers are included, faggot. Seethe and dilate.
>>19713413dave was the one that reported they might include max later and said they dont currently include max
>>19713490I don't know what calendar system you use in Rakeshistan, but here in the US goddamn states it's now 2026 and the Max numbers are included
>>19713513Cope + You're Columbian
>>19712723>Would be equivalent to a Smackdown numberSmackdown gets 800k to 1 million accounts watching on Netflix (which can include multiple people) which Meltzer never seems to mention, and that is a confirmed number unlike the fake "500k MAX viewers" which Meltzer throws around. Meltzer is just disingenuous and/or an idiot lol.
>>19713578Why would he mention worldwide viewers for Smackdown when he's talking about American cable ratings?
>>19713590Max numbers would include worldwide viewers, dingus.
>>19713597AEW is only on Max in the US. They have cable deals elsewhere.
>>19713609Anyone can use a VPN obviously, but if Meltzer is saying 500k are watching AEW on MAX in the US alone, that is even more laughable. Of course, Meltzer claims Netflix is making up their numbers, yet his source for the MAX numbers which he believes is some guy named BJ in Ohio kek.
>>19713640this guy?
>>19713646yes and he's shot gay
>>19713654Porkwheeler saw his name was BJ and saw it as an invitation
