https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WWF_trademark_dispute>On April 17, 2000, the Fund commenced proceedings in the High Court of Justice in England against the Federation, citing breaches of their 1994 international agreement, as the Fund was based in Switzerland, and the Federation was based in the United States.The Fund is based in Switzerland. The Federation is based in the United States. So why was this contested in England?
>>19711614We run the world, sorry.
>>19711614I wonder how many animals the World Wildlife Fund could have saved with that money they pissed down the toilet with this frivolous lawsuit.
>>19711614>So why was this contested in England?to make you seethe
>On December 1, 2002, the WWF.com web domain name expired. WWE had allowed the domain name to lapse, as there was no legal obligation to transfer the asset to the Fund. The domain was quickly acquired by Frank Baach, who sold it to Gregory Ricks from Texas in 2003, who used the domain for his "Web Wrestling Forum".[54] On November 17, 2006, it was announced that the Fund's attempt to obtain the domain name through ICANN's UDRP system, on the grounds that it was registered in bad faith, was unsuccessful, as Ricks was using the web domain for professional wrestling forum purposes and therefore did not pretend to be affiliated with the Fund.What a bunch of babies lmfao
