>tfw you are such a shit interview that wwe makes you drop your belt
>"Oh yeah Stone Cold you sit there and you think you're being smart talking rings around me, well I think you're STINKY">puts on the dimes repellent coat and the gasmask >"EEEEEEEEEWWWW!">"SMELLY STEVE! STINKY STEVIE!"
Why man? HEY HEY!BECAUSE JON GOT HIGHBECAUSE JON GOT HIGHBECAUSE JON GOT HIIIIIIGHLAH DA DA DA DA!
>>19782653DEAN
>>19782672he's a big guy
>>19782653I remember watching this live, and laughing my ass off. Total cringekino.
>>19782681
>>19782653>DEAN! Tell me about the time your uncle raped you. Give me some to work with here for Christ’s sake!wtf was Dean’s problem?
>>19782653Can someone QRD that interview for me? I've always refused to watch any type of interview about the Shield shitters
>>19783192typical hardass steve vs a laid-back dean who didn't want to go into his past. just not on the same wavelength for a podcast episode they both probably forgot about the next morning
Dean got exposed hard. Got sent down to the minor leagues
Was this interview before or after Brock refused to do bingo hall shit?
>>19783494Same year but their WM match happened few months earlier
>>19782653Angry Austin is literally Kane
>>19782653>can't even get a millyhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XyM7FsiHMKQ
>>19782653>doesn't give it to the people>goes bald>career ruined
>>19782759Why did WWE think it was a good idea to do live podcasts back then, was it anything to boost content and subscribers for the network?
he thought he was too cool to do worked interviews
he is a crackhead lol
These were just a bad idea. There’s no way to answer “why do you suck” in a way that makes you look good and doesn’t piss off someone. Mox probably gave the best answer. Brock is so obviously lazy and will only put in the work if Vince gives him piss vids. But he didn’t have the backstage pull to say that without repercussions. I think he asked Cesaro why he wasn’t pushed more and the honest answer is either cause he can’t talk for 20 minutes like wwe expects or that Vince is a bad booker who cant make the card top to bottom entertaining by playing to the strengths of each wrestler. Neither of those answers will win him any points.
>>19784590>These were just a bad ideabullshit they were dimes, dean was just a total retard
>>19784634Name a good one
>>19784648all of them? literally everything on the Network was Kino
>>19784652No. You must miss when you got everything for 9.99 and didn’t have to pay pig half a dozen different companies to watch your eslop.
>>19783192Dean was drunk and not answering questions. Steve got frustrated because he’s thinking to himself “why the fuck are we here if you don’t want to participate in the damn podcast”
>>19784733I just pay Netflix for everything but I don’t live in a 3rd world country.
>refuse to give it to the people>lose belt>eventually feud with nia jaxkek based vince burying this faggot
>>19784733funnily enough we never paid, believe it or not you could just get random accounts from the internet if you searched long enough and they worked second of all I don't have to pay for anything either way because watchwrestling exists
>>19783412Austin asked around for Moxleys phone number so that he could apologize for fucking it up.
>>19783192It was basically like one of those Rogan interviews where it becomes quickly apparent he has zero chemistry with the interviewee and they don't really have much to say and/or aren't particularly interesting. However, because Austin is Austin and not Rogan, he lost his cool and started making it very obvious he was getting frustrated.
>>19782653This was the interview that made him AEW's top guy
>>19785229kek true.Damn I love laughing at AEW!
>>19782672This was kino
>>19783192>Interview starts off as mostly bland and boring>Dean is a little closed off>Austin tries to delve into Deans early life >Dean doesn't want to engage with this topic>Austin gets visibly frustrated >Dean gets even more closed off>Interview becomes a cluster fuck
Mox should have responded to the pivot by bringing up Debra
>how about YOU give it to the people?
>>19784648the heyman interview
