Estimated Dynamite viewership including Max just dropped
>>19814821YES MAX MILLY
>>19814821fuck you for trying to make me read graphs
Watching>Trannymite>Simpact>RamCouldn't be moi
made up numbers
>>19814821>everyone that canAnd this right here is Meltzer logic. Assuming that everyone that can watch AEW does watch AEW. Absolutely retarded. This isn't high level math, it's faith based.
>>19814821Source: davemeltzerwonAaaaand it's nothing
>>19814821God damn. So if I'm reading this right, the first scenario is basically AEW's impossibly low rock bottom during a normal week, given that we already know some people who have both TBS & MAX certainly watch on MAX. AEW is doing a lot better than
>>19814821>wheels so defeated that he has resorted to thisdamn, are things that grim in the cord?
>>19814821Dynamite has about the same numbers as Slopdown. Believable.
>>19814821>Source: Dave said
>>19814821Nielsen does weekly HBO Max rankings, the bottom 10 does sub 100k
They release streaming numbers when they're good. AEW isn't doing well, simple as.
>>19815110So SNME and the ESPN PPVs must be doing terrible
>>19815120Probably. WWE sucks too now
>>19815050do you have a source on that and if they even count dynamite? it's only in the US
>>19815126fairs
>>19815120fraid so
>>19815313grim if true
>>19815313i mean, anyone here could have told them that sounded like a retarded price to pay for wwe pay per views. there was nothing going on in the company in terms of storylines or stars to make anyone think they'd be able to improve on the momentum on cody beating roman.
>>19815939Hollywood expects to lose money on streaming startups
I trust Dave's opinion and he thinks there are more than 350k watching on MAX. I just can't believe that. 100k sounds pretty reasonable. So 700-800k total live viewers every week is still a big number.
>>19814821If I wanted to read Meltzer's autistic babbling and made up nonsense, I'd pay the $14.99/month.
>>19816394Most NBA games don't even get like 50k on HBO Max. There's no way AEW is getting 350k, or even 100k. Meltzer is just making shit up like he always does.
>>19816394Why? HBO shows get more than cable. >>19816413Cap
>>19814827FRAID SO
>>19815313If it's true then it's entirely ESPN's fault. >>19815939The only issue is that they jumped the gun and switched to ESPN before it was included in most people's TV packages. If they had waited until WrestleMania like the original plan, when deals with more providers were in place, people wouldn't be anywhere near as upset since it wouldn't cost most fans any extra.
>>19814903It's all it's ever been hombre, they are just guessing using some stupid ass math formula.
>>19817493ESPN needed content
>>19817504Yeah, but it was really confusing how they went about it, because WWE is basically the only exclusive content on ESPN Unlimited. The main selling point of the service is that you get the ESPN TV channels, and that's where all the marketing was. Their website prior to launch basically didn't mention WWE at all, and only talked about the streams of the linear channels. There was confusion over what it even was. Just a dreadful, stupid launch that ESPN only has themselves to blame for. Now they're asking WWE fans to pay for ESPN when they're already paying for ESPN, although they are adding more providers now, and should have YouTube TV by Mania.
>>19814821>EstimateThis is literally some make believe excel file. Somebody actually wasted a few minutes of their life making this LOL
>>19814821
>>19817658if you get paid to post retarded shit it's correct your fucking mental midget?
Millie is all elite
>If anything 8 HBO viewers to every 10 TBS viewers feels conservative given every informal poll I've done
>>19816425It was reported by WBD themselves, the highest drawing NBA game had 43k viewers.
>>19817754where is the news coverage? sounds like a big story
>>19817722she cute
>>19818148>why aren't there news stories about the NBA doing 43k viewers on a streaming platform that very few people use to watch live sports?Try to be less retarded
>>19818148Why the fuck would that be a big story
>>19819353turn your monitor on >>19819385why wouldnt it? every other streamer we know about does great numbers for sports
>>19814821cool
nice
>>19816394I would conservatively say it's anywhere between 75k and 150k live but if we get in to catch-up territory yeah I can see it at 350-400k in the week just due to the convenience of the format. Probably a good chunk that watch it the afternoon after the show. It won't be as much live viewers simply due to how limited Max is worldwide. It's not even available in the UK due to licensing issues with Sky.
>>19819353They've pivoted to TNT Sports for a reason
>>19817754People will watch a wrestling show the day after it airs but no one's watching an NBA game on catch-up and there's more convenient ways to watch that shit
a lone man siloed, cries out; hark! the pendulum!
>>19825255you love to see it
Based Max
>>19825255lol
AEW wins again
>Dave saidUnfathomably grim
>>19825255POP
>>19814821I literally cannot understand shit(and no I don't want to either).E Piggies! You are the experts in watching number wrestling, trannyslate this and tell me what it says.
>>19814821Add +1 view for dynamite. I’m at the timeless lovebombs match. Asian lady just took a nasty bump
