The ratings include all promotions.
Good list. Here’s the top ten list of actors that Roger Ebert gave the most four stars to:1. **Robert De Niro** – 92. **Meryl Streep** – 83. **Jack Nicholson** – 84. **Al Pacino** – 75. **Dustin Hoffman** – 76. **Tom Hanks** – 67. **Gene Hackman** – 68. **Daniel Day-Lewis** – 69. **Ingrid Bergman** – 610. **Marlon Brando** – 6
>>19897670I don’t know any of these people.
>>19897695Shang Chi made more money than any of their movies therefore Awkwafina is a better actor than any of them
this is like trusting kotaku to make a best games of all time list
>>19897670>these are the best wrestlers according to a zionist jew
>>19897670It's funny that Meltzer stars have become almost inverse of quality but having a few of them is still goodLike when you pass 10 or so five star matches it's just a coinflip as to whether you're actually good or if Meltzer just has an autistic fixation over you and you're shit
>>19897695Solid list.
>>19897695What is this, some boomer's list from the 1990s?
>>19897670This list BTFOs itself even if you're an indiefag because all those guys below Ospreay are better indie wrestlers than Ospreay is.
If you can get 7 how is 5 good?
>>19897729zionist stars are so fucking stupidfigures leftist trannies are a slave to the jew system
5 in the 90s = 7 in the 2020s
>>19897670fine list
>>19897745>this slop got a 5 star match
this >>19897717 but for >>19897670
>>19897670okoda and assplay both suck so I'm gunna assume every wrestler and every match on this list is bad
>>19897718Didn't the guy who make the list die in the mid 2000s from face cancer?he was also at peak popularity because he was on TV and most people did not use the internet at that time
>>19897839yeah most lists like in the OP are just out of touch boomers who still thing theyre relevant
>>19897670Why don't people want to see literally the best wrestler of all time and why is the promotion he wrestles for so unpopular?
