BIG DAVE FROM THE TOP ROPE
>food analogy
>another chef who isn't eating any food
>>20027810Dave won't fuck you trannytits
>>20027810More like a some guy who prefers Asian and Asian fusion food is going to diners and comparing the burgers to sushi and claiming burgers to be inferior to sushi based on his own preferences and telling anyone who prefers burgers that they objectively wrong.
They act like they don't care about him and then do this
>>20027810Meltzgod just doesn’t miss does he.>I’m not a chef but I know if a restaurant is good better than a chef who has never been thereAbsolutely chefs kiss, no pun intended. Edrones don’t know what wrestling or even entertainment is.
>>20027904He's not gonna unban you from the WON forums no matter how much you suck his dick, Trev.
>>20027810Based Davemeister making the piggErs oink and squeal
>>20027810>still worshipping a baby eating zionist Ireland isn't sending their best...
>>20027810He will frequently explain that ratings are his way of reacting to the match and should be seen as just one person’s perspective, without claiming universal truth. However, when defending the legitimacy of his ratings, he often shifts to making broader claims that the ratings are more than just personal opinion. He emphasizes that his star ratings have a "weight" in the wrestling world, and they are taken seriously by fans, wrestlers, and promoters alike. well dave which is it, retard?
the real irony is that meltzer grades WWE on a curve so their matches automatically get an extra star, but you'd never know because antismarks apparently don't
>>20027810YA JUST GOTTA
>>20027810>another chef who isn't eating any food
>>20027904If a chef heard about a new restaurant that was popular he might know the people who run it and have first hand experience interacting with them, he would know from previous restaurants they've run whether or not the restaurant is worth visiting before ever eating the food. You can use this same analogy with pro wrestling to discredit jew Meltzer.
>>20027810with that username it's clearly your accountyou're being extremely disingenuous and baiting an actual autist into posting dribble in order to mock the "side you don't like" to get a couple (you)s on le 4chan xdxdxdyou definitely tricked the sub 70 iq tards on here though so congratulations there
>>20028160>He will frequently explain that ratings are his way of reacting to the match and should be seen as just one person’s perspective, without claiming universal truth.but he also says he has given good ratings to matches he didnt like. and said he liked a match but had to take off points because it was too dangerous. he 100% thinks his ratings are objective fact
