This. Booking dosent matter as long as every year the profits goes up.Paul is by evidence the most successfull booker of all time. You may not like it, but its the truth
>>20028954Sure it does. It's everything. TKO Holdings Group specializes in maximizing revenues by extracting every penny it can by capitalizing on latent financial opportunities available in the shifting media landscape. An entertainment company that has preserved a large and loyal audience for decades is going to easily>secure media rights deals with Netflix and ESPN+>attract more and more sponsorship deals with adspace on the mat, the turnbuckles, props, an extra hour of SD, streaming service airtime, etc.>aggressively pursue new and renewed licensing agreements in every country they broadcast in>expand their live event schedule by adding several SNMEs, a new show like Wrestlepalooza, and another night for a stadium show like Summerslam (and with it another day of "fan experience" events to sell merch and tickets to see stars like Rhea Ripley, Jey Uso, and others talk about nothing for 10 minutes)>I'm sure there are numerous other revenue streams I'm failing to mention -- ones they already have and ones they'll establish in the coming monthsA similar story can be told about the UFC. All this is true in spite of the undeniable signs that both TKO companies are gradually declining in popularity with the public at large. Dana White is every bit as desperate to find the next Conor McGregor and Rhonda Rousey as HHH is to find the next Cody Rhodes and Roman Reigns. If they don't, the inevitable next shift in the media landscape are going to sap both ventures of their value and TKO will begin considering moving these assets and their enormous annual operating costs. The long track record of Vince's company is what is driving all of this financial success, and the alarmingly terrible booking of Paul's Creative department is the greatest threat to it. As every financial specialist knows by heart: "past performance is not indicative of future results." Paul's shitty booking matters more than misleading profits.
>>20029209Not reading that big old wall of cope and seethe.
>>20029220k
>>20028954Do we have a real name for the Line Go Up enshitification fallacy of corporate America yet?
>>20029209>find the next Cody Rhodes and Roman ReignsThose are just solid talents in the big picture. Neither are Cena or Rock or Bruno.>The long track record of Vince's company is what is driving all of this financial success, and the alarmingly terrible booking of Paul's Creative department is the greatest threat to it. Vince showed they can have years of simplistic or outright garbage booking and still make good money from the overall entertainment spectacle. As Cornette likes to say, Vince turned it into the McDonald's of wrestling and standards are just low booking wise from casual fans. Less rednecks and virtually no marks in the crowd now, but we're at an all time high of people just wanting to have FUN with the ring entrances and such, and it's more acceptable than ever for adults to buy wrestling shirts and toys and to cosplay as Danhausen. Bad booking for Stephanie Vaquer, for example, doesn't matter as much if the people just like her outfit and butt move.
>>20028954>it doesn't matter if you like or enjoy the show you watch as long as LE PROFITSYes it fucking does you bootlicking cuck.
>>20028954wow we really needed a whole new thread for this retarded fucking tweet from literally who
WWE fans be like >The company makes soooo much money>______ is going to sell sooooo much merch >I'm not really massive on the product right now, but they're making soooo much profit
>>20029209>Maximize shareholder valueYep. Look into Dodge brothers vs Ford for the ruling we live under
>>20028954Watching numbers go up on a balance sheet isn't good TV unless you're Jewish
