You don't appreciate it until it's gone
Hence the 41%
>>20429514one of the best long term stories in wrestling
>>20429598Yeah right up until the reveal that the big bad evil group was Garrett Bischoff and Mike Knox at which point it died a painful death
Possibly the most anti-dimes group to ever exist.
>>20429598true
>>20429598Get outta here Bubba
>>20429514I'll just never care about bikers, sorry OP.
Other than 05, what years of TNA are worth watching? Or at least watching the ppvs?
it's still funny they settled on bubba lard being the leader, cuz pretty positive he wasn't even considered for the role
>>20430763The Main Event Mafia era was peak TNA for me
>>20430763None. There are very brief parts that are more good than bad and then it immediately goes to shit again.
>>20430763If you REALLY want to narrow it down 2006 through most of 2009 is probably what people would call TNA's peak. TNA before that is still fun and worth checking out, minus Jeff Jarrett's bullshit. TNA after 2009 is when Hogan shows up and it turns to shit.
>>20430821This could be said about wrestling as a whole since WCW died.
>>20429514>The Dudleys>D'lo Brown>Festus>Mike Knox>Some nepo flunkiesGenuinely might be the WOAT ""main event"” stable
>>20429600>>20430011>>20430908Yeah ultimately the problem with this stable was that there were no good free agents in wrestling at the time, none that TNA could get actually, so the reveals is when everyone lost interest. This was the type of story that really needed someone like a Batista
>>20429600tna was unironically really good at building intrigue and stories... but then invariably shat the bed when it came to delivering a satisfying conclusion.
