To Women,I resent you because your outlook is elitist, reductive, childish, imperious, overbearing, hypocritical, and arrogant. You're not engaging with the many men being disaffected by your collective behavior, and I think the damage to your credibility and reputation is becoming permanent. Your entire life you've been living under the delusion that misogyny exists and you've bent over backwards trying to invent interpretations of uncouth or even innocuous male behavior to justify how you're acting. But I think men are now really starting to hate you for how you treat them. And the way they express that hatred will be much more blunt and direct than your delusional victim screeching of the past. I think the true undercurrent in the zeitgeist might really be that you're just past talking to or reasoning with at this point. You're arrogant and can't realize the gravity of your mistake or the changing nature of your position. You have a lot to be sorry for, and not only are you ignorant of it, you actually still want to argue that you didn't do anything wrong. If anyone ever deserved a punishment, it would be you. You are awful and remorseless about it. There's actually nothing to negotiate and it's a shame you exist the way you do.Anon>Last Thread:>>82333849>Song of the Day:https://youtu.be/Ixi0sUpLVRc?si=y5z3AhQLMVic1I2Z>Haiku of the night:Do you even readthese sullen haikus I writeI do wonder that
>>82342063i dont think all of them are evil some are just staline evil level
>>82342063Hey, femanon here.If a woman has hurt you in the past, that's because she's genuinely a bad person. You should be treated with respect and love. Woman are just people, and some of them may be bad person, but overall don't hate on us as a collective. Please. There are good people out there
>>82342103>i dont think all of them are evil some are just staline evil levelThat depends on what you qualify as evil, and how you grade it. Lots of people want to define good and evil around themselves and give themselves a higher moral ranking than others, so it's a fraut and highly charged discussion. What I can say is that I think opinions of them collectively are slowly changing underneath. Further, because those opinions are caused by women's arrogance, they will never be capable of effectively recognizing or mending them. When you're arrogant, the only thing you ever do is make things worse until something breaks. There's no other visible direction in women's collective consciousness right now than continuing to make the mistakes they're making. They can't conceptualize it because it's too painful and exhausting and they feel like they might be able to get away with just ignoring it or arguing the issue instead.
>>82342171>Woman are just people, and some of them may be bad person, but overall don't hate on us as a collective. Please.I somewhat agree and disagree. Women are not just people, they have a set of experiences, hormones, dialectic and group consciousness that is notably different and visibly opposed to men. However the biggest mistake here women as a group are making is arrogance, which men too make plenty. I don't think I want to make the argument that women are inherently "lesser" , in terms of value or status. I will point out to you that women as a collective subject are acting arrogantly and the resulting consequence you will likely not like. Besides the main point, i think i'm a little frustrated that you are claiming that I am the hater and not questioning yourself instead. This is a time for all women to be self reflecting on their own behavior towards men, not making snap judgements of men and out of touch appeals for them to just stop feeling mistreated and get over it. Your tone is more entreating, but the 'gist, the soul of what you're asking me to do is telling me to just stop articulating the problem I and other men experience. You've not offered me anything, you've not consoled me, you've not promised to do better yourself to make up for it, or made an effort to self reflect on your own behavior. All you're telling me is that I ought to be inert as you or other women mistreat me. You think i'm hateful or irrational for the aspect of complaining about how I am treated. You find the notion that I might be completely valid in my complaints absurd and refuse to consider them. That is arrogance, hubris. I am not your problem. I'm articulating your problem. Perhaps you'll see this by an analogy. When an earthquake happens under the ocean, a tsunami current breaks out and heads towards the coast. If you were on a ship at sea, you would scarcely notice it pass underneath you. You only feel it once it lands ashore. Your problem is the current underneath
>>82342171I can't hear you over the sound of 86 men an hour killing themselves. Maybe you should find out why they are doing that.
>>82342266Stop writing too much retard
>>82342409Just go somewhere else.
>>82342348Cause we can , women can't even rape and because of that they think that they're good people, being a crippled weak retard doesn't make you more virtuous you rape stat
>>82342171all people are part of groups you dumb lib. the idea that people primarily exist as individuals and should be judged as such is anti-collectivist, anti-leftist and expressing such an idea would be grounds for execution in a true leftist state.
Where are the women that don't hate men, dare I say even like them? I don't ever see them anywhere. I don't hear from them. Never met one. And it all makes a man ask "why should I like or care for all these women that frankly don't like or care about me? Why is every gendered interaction always one way?" There's no explanation. The problem is that men are being ordered not to organize by their state and by policing. Were men to be allowed to organize, were they allowed their first amendment right to speech and not hyper censored even in common or private conversation let alone publishing, they might organize and do something to fix their problem which the conniving state of geronocratic parasitic out of touch elitists, bankers and financiers and conniving evil traitorous whore wives doesn't want.
>>82342475>you dumb libthis isn't /pol/ liberals are corrupt and bakrupt, and there is a strong affinity between women and liberals because liberals offer women legal and institutional support explicitly in exchange to buy their votes and keep middle and lower class men in a state of confusion and invalidation, but there is something to be said for keeping focus on women and not drifting off to a discussion about other admittedly related but technically different topics.
>>82342171He won't hear it, he has to call us evil just to continue spamming his self pitying and victim posts, the piggie pic is cute tho, pigs are very cute and smart animasl
>>82342830you didn't understand my argument, which was against her liberal argument that we're all atomised individuals rather than members of groups. calling such a belief liberal is simply a statement of fact.
>>82342171These posts are about women's behavior overall, not a specific woman. The way the overwhelming majority of women feel they can behave is evil toward men and they (including you) refuse to acknowledge it. In your case you're assuming OP has a distorted view of women due to a personal experience with a specific individual. That's not the point of the post and you ignoring it is only showcasing your own ignorance.
>>82342866>you didn't understand my argumentincorrect. Read it again.
>>82342852What convinces you that you aren't evil? If you thought about it, it's actually ignorance. You avoid thinking about it.
>>82342941your post runs off on a tangent about how women and liberals are allied. i was literally only making a technical point about her being a liberal, as individualism is a liberal belief, in support of identifying people primarily as being part of groups, which you obviously believe as you're banging on about women as if they're a group.
>>82342852>he has to call us evilThe OP's complaining about WOMEN tranny, don't worry: you don't count.
Women want men to suffer and struggle more and have no higher order thinking about why or if it could have a consequence they are carelessly cruel and awful and it's only continuing to decay.
