Have any of you ever met or seen an ACTUALLY intelligent woman? I haven't.Sure, some women are academically capable, but that's not the same thing. Not to mention how women are good at drone work, that academia is built around making women succeed, and that education doesn't necessarily indicate intelligence.I women routinely not understand basic things like analogies, cause and effect, economics, the point about education above, generalizations, empathy, fucking pattern recognition.Additionally, the fact that they're emotional and have no accountability often gets in the way of any intelligence they may have. ex. instead of understanding what's being said and thinking about it, they react emotionally, get offended, and don't even try to understand.So, where are all the actually intelligent women?
>>82367388i don't care whether someone is intelligent
Women and weak men conflate women blindly following the social group with intelligence, similarly to how women conflate bad behavior in Chads as confidence.
>>82367397Not what I asked. Are you a woman, or just retarded.
I remember being in school, even as young as like 12, and thinking about how my teachers were fucking retarded.Sure, they knew more academically than me in the subject matter, but you can tell that they're not actually THINKING about things.They do things like follow protocol or rules in a literal way, without actually understanding what the rule is for. They follow the letter of the law, not the spirit.Not to mention how they're emotionally stunted. These fuckers actually treat their students like competition, like their emotional equals. Either that or they throw their rank around instead of exhibiting their maturity.
>actually intelligentYou mean incelligent?Sure, there are probably tons of anxious, overthinking women who hole themselves up in their rooms all day collecting rote facts about boring shit. And thinking that their abstract intelligence is valuable in itself.The kind of intelligence you are describing, that dumb, surface level intelligence that doctors, scientists and entrepreneurs have, the kind of "doing and thinking" intelligence built civilization. And yes, you can point at a lot of women in those fields.People with incelligence are just a drain, unless they can push through their anxiety and get menial work. They will hate it, but at least they can contribute.
>>82367388Bumping because i am curious about the topic. I have met a few academically smart women, they were "independent" feminists and struggled with discipline and self control though, resulting in them having a bad diet and unhealthy lifestyles. It also seems to me their ego and emotions gets in the way too much, aside from that they were cool with me and usually kind.What's interesting for me is how it's ok to believe men are stronger physically, have more stamina and endurance, more practical, yet if you imply that they are smarter you are deemed a sexist and you're supposed to believe we are equals when it comes to intelligence.
>>82367447obviously women being intelligent or not would have to be something that has any bearing on anything, but it doesn't
This one's more about politics, but I really wanna point out the multiple levels of how stupid this is:>not understanding orders of magnitude, millions and billions>too stupid to realize there's something wrong>too arrogant to double check her math>the assets aren't liquid (both women and leftists don't understand this)>selling assets would quickly devalue the wealth, so the total would be way lower>liquidating assets would destroy a bunch of jobs and infrastructure, probably a net negative>the stupid people would just waste their money anyway, like with stimulus checks>it wouldn't even help anyone, it'd just cause inflation (women and leftists still don't understand this, even after the minimum wage thing a few years ago)>the utter entitlement to other people's wealth>TDS and hatred of rich people. maybe jealousy>they claim rich people stole wealth, so their solution is to steal their wealth>these communist retards forget the donations that rich people pay, whether they're tax write-offs or not, it's probably still a net positive
>>82367522It has a bearing on their ego and arrogance, which leads to problems for both men and the women themselves.Like career women who are 30-40 and freaking out because they don't understand that women like a rich man, but men don't really care about women's money.
>>82367388The first thing I noticed. They can memorize a lot of informationSecondly, they tend to take up the opinions of their partner. absent that, the opinions of their family, absent that, the opinions of her phone.
how many living humans that you know would you describe as intelligent and self-aware, period?
>>82367518>their ego and emotions gets in the wayYes, I've noticed this many many times. Sometimes it's not such a huge a lack of intelligence exactly, but that their emotions get in the way. It seems to be painfully common.Even basic things like getting so offended that they don't realize something is just a dumb joke.Or being so quick to attack and prove themselves right, that they attack a hyperbole that was just said as an example.They bathe in their emotions and take everything super seriously, and completely miss the point of what's being said. Women do this all the time, they'll fixate on one trigger word and ignore the whole point. Surely they do this (at least subconsciously) on purpose to avoid dealing with the point.>When a wise man points at the moon, the fool examines the finger
>>82367558>Like career women who are 30-40 and freaking out because they don't understand that women like a rich man, but men don't really care about women's money.this is called dialectical truth and it doesn't make someone stupid for struggling with it
>>82367518>yet if you imply that they are smarter you are deemed a sexistIt's all about ego, like you said, and not truth.Their ego has accepted that men are stronger, taller, etc., so it's fine. But they haven't accepted the idea that they're equal or smarter than men, so they don't align with it. The actual truth is completely irrelevant to women. It's all about how they feel.
It's fucking retarded when women claim they're vetting a man for his intelligence, yet they're fucking stupid themselves.Same for scanning for confidence, when they're an insecure wreck. And strength when they're emotional, wealth when they're poor\stupid, etc.Simps in the past have given women the power to make everyone's lives worse.
>>82367623Yes I feel like the processing is there, but ego intervenes because as a woman, she needs to measure things on the social scale of how it relates to her and others in her social circle. I mean you've heard of the women going on the world trip and banging multple guys in each country? Back home she would be a pariah, but since it's far away and no one will know she can do what she likes. Everything ends in the local social value system
>>82367561That's true. They mistakenly believe that repetition and memorizing information is intelligence>take up the opinions ofI've developed a sort of theory about this.Mentally weak people can't stand on their own, so they absolutely NEED to join a social group, and because they're terrified of being kicked out, they automatically align themselves with everything the social group does or says.It's like that one post. They don't think "Is this true?", they think "Does my social group align with this?".This makes them very very vulnerable to manufactured consensus, hence the NPC phenomena.
>>82367388>another misogyny threadyawn.
>>82367600A few, certainly not many. I know men who might not be overall smart, but are very capable in at least one specific field of intelligence.
>>82367617You're telling me someone isn't stupid for not realizing that men want different things than women, FOR TWENTY PLUS FUCKING YEARS?You could more strongly argue that those women are a victim of "strong and independent" propaganda. Which by the way older women push on younger women, to rationalize their bad choices.
>>82367687How? I have never met a man who I would consider intelligent.
>>82367388Kind of related, but can anybody here explain why women online say "ha ha men need to take acid to realise everybody has their own lives" or "men do shrooms and discover the same things a 13 year old girl realised in her bedroom" and shit like this, thinking it is a massive own?
>>82367707Because women naturally have more creative minds and it takes something like acid to create a little bit of flexibility in a mans brain.
>>82367700ALL MEN don't want the same thing you fucking insipid twat
>>82367719Women aren't as creative as men though? Men dominate in influence in the realms of literature, fine art, philosophy, architecture, sculpture, skilled trades, music, etc...
>>82367736I wasn't talking about dominance, I was talking about creativity. There is no debate about how much more creative women are lol.
>>82367736Men who are in the female realms of literature and art would be considered homosexual or female coded.
>>82367748Okay, then I'm also going to argue that the average male is more creative than the average woman, since women can cruise through life on easy mode if they are not fat, but men need to get creative to succeed in life if sub-chad, which the vast majority are.
>>82367757Unfortunate, it is very masculine to be an artist. Solider, poet, king
>>82367655>Everything ends in the local social value systemVery very true. It's like the women who are relatively modest around their parents, but become giga whores when they go to college.And how women will do the most morally corrupt things, but they don't mind it as long as their social group approves of it.Women do not have views or stances, they just copy what their group tells them. Repeal the 19th.
>>82367703Well, how are you personally considering intelligence?As I understand it, you can estimate based on performance in various fields, like pattern recognition or empathy. Although usually you don't even need to go that far, as stupid people get stuck on basic things like analogies.How about online? Are there any men you consider intelligent online?
>>82367788circlejerking is also masculine
>>82367769Sure but you're just yapping. By definition, there are tradeoffs with any level of aptitude or skill that you have. Men are naturally stronger and more determined and reach a level of emotional stability faster and more reliably. They are generally more logical and grounded in truth and what is. If they started being more creative and tend to deal with abstractions and what is not, then that would require a tradeoff in becoming less logical and less grounded in truth. As it turns out, for this specific subject, men are less creative while being more logical, and women are more creative while being less logical. Women might be more open-minded, but men are more efficient. You sucked my dick, but I fucked ya moms. Youre'r example of men being more capable of being exceptional painters and/or becoming famous is actually irrelevant, especially when most of the exceptionally creative men are notoriously gay or feminine.
>>82367707That sounds like projection. Women love to take the bad things they do and claim it's men who do them.Women are the ones who've never stepped foot outside of their intellectual village their whole lives, and any glimpse of the outside is mindblowing. Pic related.Even if it's not projection, it's arrogance. Of course men and women have different experiences and one might realize something sooner than the other. To hold this above someone else's head is just petty and weak.
>>82367813>Sure but you're just yappingYour post has lots of words that I am not going to read. It has been a fun discussion, but we will end it here.
>>82367788Yes this is true, artists are trans masc and warriors are fem.
>>82367725Two ways I can tell you're retarded:1. "All men don't want" instead of "Not all men want".2. Missing the point, probably on purpose. (Proof of ego getting in the way of intelligence right here)3. Not realizing there's a general trend among men's tastes, and that exceptions don't break the rule. An example of how not understanding generalizations is a sign of low IQ.
>>82367835Based and maybe ironypilled, since this would prove my point almost perfectly. We really did it, bros.
>>82367647Couldn't have said it better myself. Most women mistake arrogance and shallow stuff for confidence and intelligence
>>82367736It's the ego issue again. Women convinced themselves that they're more creative than men, so now that's what they repeat, even if it's not true.They're clinging on to any way to "win", to soothe their ego. It's like a child on the playground mentioning a technicality to prove that they won, when they clearly didn't. Which is something leftists do a lot too.
>>82367854>young children convinced themselves that they are younger than old people, even if that's not truePreach! It was always dubious to claim that age makes a difference in people when everything is genetic.
>>82367813>If they started being more creative and tend to deal with abstractionsGonna stop you right there. Women are so lacking in abstract thought, that they have a hard time conceiving of a different perspective, or how someone would reach a different conclusion than her.Women are so solipsistic and lacking in empathy, that it's immensely retarded to say they have any notable degree of abstract thought.
>>82367854Nta but the far right does this a ton too. It's almost as if all extremists are retarded
>>82367874>women>lacking in empathypeak brainrot but I respect it. try making it a little bit funnier next time you do this meme.
>>82367846NTA but you're doing the woman thing of twisting everything into you "winning". You're not caring about the truth, but rather who "won" the argument, which is an immature and petty way of thinking.This is a very common thing when arguing with women and leftists, there's NEVER an outcome where they're wrong, they ALWAYS twist things into them being right (ie "winning"). If you made a flowchart with all possible points and counter points when talking to a woman or leftist, none of them would connect to the "they admit the man is right" node.
>>82367874>WOMEN HAVE SUICIDAL LEVELS OF EMPATHY! THEY CANT BE LOGICAL AT ALL>WAIT NO! IM RETARDED, WOMEN ARE PURELY LOGICAL CREATURES WITH NO EMPATHY! what is a woman?
>>82367388Yeah once. It's extremely rare though, we're talking 1 in a million or something.
>>82367892Nobody said anything about winning. Your attempt at ad hoc is completely pointless. Debate bros usually say that women=bad, so it doesn't even make any sense to think that you're arguing against a debate bro. You can't argue with someone who claims women=bad because they will just do anything to "win" the argument it's actually sad and pathetic, they probably don't get any sex.
>>82367884Going "but men\right\etc do it too" is not a reasonable argument.You can of course point to examples of the Right doing this, but it's extremely common with the Left. Just look at all the examples of them trying to catch Trump in a technicality, or calling him racist\sexist\bigot\literally Hitler\etc., instead of addressing ANY of his points or political stances.Pic related, it's a good read.
>>82367545$5.5 would probably get me a decent cheap meal though
>>82367905Do elaborate. We need to bring more attention to actually intelligent women, and less on retarded ones.
>>82367923It's completely reasonable and correct to say that the right does it too. They never address any point they just use insults.
>>82367388>Have any of you ever met or seen an ACTUALLY intelligent woman?No i didn't and it's driving me insane.
You can tell this thread is making good points when the paid shills show up to disrupt>If the situation was hopeless, their propaganda would be unnecessary
>>82367936When I was at university studying computer science there was this girl who I got put in a group with and she was extremely intelligent. It's the only time I've met someone more intelligent than I am (have IQ about 156).She instantly understood everything with the complex mathematics and equations we were learning, and would just instantly give the answer to complicated sums without a calculator. She was so far ahead of me I had to keep asking how she got that answer, because she'd done it all in her head almost instantly.
Women don't understand compound interest. Which is perhaps related to the low IQ sign of living in the present, and not thinking about the future.I know most people aren't Math experts, but if you're spending literal tens of thousands of dollars, surely a reasonable person would try to think about things a little, maybe even pull out a calculator.No fucking wonder people are paying triple what something already cost when they get a loan.This chick probably doesn't really care, anyway. Her husband's probably paying for this shit.
>>82367994your pic is about amortization not compound interest, also its clearly a troll. men don't understand humor or social cues.
>>82367994Again, I don't expect someone to be a math expert, but if you see an interest rate of 17%, wouldn't your immediate thought be something like "I can just save up money for 6 months, and make the payment in one go", cause 100/17 is ~5.88.How the fuck do you expect to pay off a loan if your income isn't higher than the payments? And if your income is higher, it's smarter to just save and buy at once. I guess the only exception is if you need something immediately, but still.Am I a super genius for instantly realizing this, or are people just retarded? I mean come on.
One of the biggest and most ironic signs of low intelligence is women who think a degree means they're intelligent.Not only that, these retards become fucking arrogant about it. You'd think a reasonable person would be kinda humble, even if they were smarter.Shit, maybe them being arrogant about intelligence is a sign of low intelligence itself.
>>82368029Most 17 year olds just have a much higher income so they dont need to worry about this.
>>82368044That or having a "high IQ." Any time a woman talks about her degree or high IQ you can tell she's probably not even a millionaire and has never been to any big conferences for intelligent professionals.
>>82368057Right. You'd think an actually smart person would be kinda quiet about it. It's the retards that brag.It's like how poor people buy expensive shit to try to convince other poor people that they're rich. Utter fucking insanity. Completely fucking stupid idiocy.
>>82367994The funniest one is decades ago someone found a really simple test that most women fail, including college educated women. Something to do with picture of a glass of water turned at an angle, and predicting what the water inside will do.To any man, even a 10 year old boy, they'll get it right immediately and not even understand how it's possible to get it wrong.It's not about being stupid per se, but women seem to suffer with visualising things in 3D space. This is why they struggle with parking. They can't rotate stuff in their mind or tell you which of shapes match or where things will fit, and this is one of the areas they always score lower in IQ test. Women tend to score better than men on language stuff and anything involving words.
>>82368095This. It's the same with how people call themselves "incels" or "femcels" despite being the biggest normies on earth if they just went outside. They just want attention for something they cannot achieve themselves.
>>82368097Can you get me more info on that water glass test? I'm really interested in these kinds of IQ\ability tests. Plus I kinda vaguely remember something like that.
>>82368097>Women tend to score better than men on language stuff and anything involving words.I wonder how that's measured, cause from what I see, women are utter shit at explaining themselves and communicating.
>>82368143Perhaps because the reference the scoring is based off of was made by people of similiar capacity.
>>82367845>picthe average untrained man is stronger than a female athlete
A HUGE indicator of low IQ is lack of empathy. These women will be completely unable to empathize with things that don't physically look like themselves. ex. black woman can't empathize with a white woman character, only with other black women.
>>82368143You can have a high verbal IQ but still lie a lot and manipulate language etc. See for example, Jews.With women, the fact they don't make themselves understood isn't because they're bad with language, but because of their nature - they expect men to guess what they want as part of their shit tests, because that's how they feel loved, if their man guesses what's in their head, or knows why they're upset etc.Everything women say is very nuanced and never black and white, and they don't say what they mean.
>>82368136It's called the Piaget water level test. You can Google it.Pic related is the entire test. Glass of water on a table in figure 1. Draw the water level after the glass is tipped to the position in figure 2.
>>82368157I can believe that. Similarly, the average man can probably win against a mid-level female UFC fighter at least.>but uhhhhm I know one woman who's stronger than one man, so uhhhh all women are stronger haha I win
>>82368164They even make memes about it. I always lol when stuff like this reaches the semi-mainstream.
>>82368185Which study said that most women fail and that 100% of men get it right? Most studies on piaget water level test have a sample size of like 10 people and show that most women get it right.
>>82368164Dogshit comment. White guys whine every fucking time there's a nonwhite or non Asian person in a videogame, somehow the bullshit you spew doesn't seem to apply to you, hypocrite
>>82368170That's a very good point, I completely forgot that women like to wrap everything they do and say in plausible deniability.Also this seems to be another case of other retardation getting in the way of IQ. And while I'm here, that whole mentality seems to be a sign of lack of maturity.
>>82368233white guys have no empathy, retard. they have the lowest IQ of the bunch.
>>82368164Oh and I should point out that you making claims of low iq while acting the very way you accuse others of acting is telling.Nobody should give a fuck about your judgement regarding their iq when you're a small brained retard yourself.People wanting to see people that look like them be represented well is the smart thing to want for the long term of your own, which is why faggots like you and most white guys are obsessed with shaming people for including other races in tv, movies, and videogames.Naturally you don't see retards like you seething about other races in books and written fiction (unless it's something extremely popular) because there's almost no chance a brainlet like you would actually pick up a book and read
>>82368252Nah come on, they definitely don't have the lowest iq. Then again the average white guy usually doesn't whine about the sort of thing I described, just the ones you get on sites like these.
as a nitwit with an IQ of 102 I've never been under the impression that women are particularly dumb. Sounds like a skill issue on your part, OP.
>>82368269they are multiple standard deviations below the others.
>>82368231Oy vey shut it down foid
>>82368185Thanks a bunch anon, I remember this now.
>>82368231I might have misremembered. It looks like it's just that twice as many women get it wrong as men, including well-educated/intelligent women.It's such an easy test that nobody should be getting it wrong, especially not women studying PhDs.
>>82368269Don't respond to obvious bait posts, friend.These retards are either paid shills to disrupt discussion, or worse, degenerates who do this for free. Just ignore them, don't feed the trolls.
>>82368297Yeah that's fair. The studies explain why. It's not that complicated.
>>82368298>mfw when somebody said "paid shills to disrupt discussion" in a thread about never being outside for long enough to meet a smart womanD E V I L I S H
>>82368164Similarly to the empathy point, people on the Left claim to be very anti-racist, but are THE most bigoted racist sexist people around, while people on the Right are the most accepting of everyone. Leftists don't even accept different opinions, let alone races.They literally have slurs specifically for this, like "pick me", "uncle tom", "oreo", "twinkie".If you want to see true racism, look at how a leftist treats a nonwhite person who leans Right.
>>82368351This is also why men on the right wing mainly hang out with leftists. They have been fighting for diversity and inclusion for most of recent history and will do anything to help out leftists.
Women don't understand positive and negative reinforcement.They don't understand that if you reward bad behavior, you'll get more of it, and if you punish good behavior, you'll get less of it.This seems to be another case of their ego\emotion getting in the way of intelligence
Women don't understand a fair deal, or a good tradeoff. They are so arrogant and simple minded, that unless they win 100% of the time, they don't want to play. Absolute black and white crybully mentality.It also relates to how they refuse to compromise.
Thread for faggots (except me)
Women don't understand casual sex.More importantly, women will not learn from their mistakes, and spend 20-30 years trying and failing, without thinking about changing their strategy.
>>82368410sub8 women never even get a chance for having sex
>>82367388The main difference between intelligent communities and the midwits is that intelligent men and women just have more kids at a younger age. If you want to find more intelligent people, go to the towns and cities where there are more kids.
Women don't understand relative vs absolute terms. You can say that one woman is less attractive than another, and they will act like you just called her ugly.Again this is related to their emotions getting in the way of their IQ.
>>82368468Isn't it the opposite? Higher end people have maybe one kid, while ghetto degenerates have 5-10?
>>82368483forgot his image award
>>823684505/10 women can have as much sex whenever they like with men significancy hotter than they are
>>82368493ghetto degenerates abort their kids and have broken families in general. childless people are noticeably unintelligent, but depending on the culture yeah you can still have smart people with just a few kids.
>>82368410That "0.0000001%" part is a good point. Women don't understand statistics and probability. They don't understand that they're very unlikely to get a certain thing, and then aim for something else.It's like retards who keep buying the lottery, thinking they're the ones who are gonna win.I guess a bit of arrogance and narcissism is what's blocking IQ here.
>>82368506They are rejected by the men. even the ones who are unattractive.
>>82368506Don't reply to obvious bait posts.
>>82367388Wait are you saying your own mother is a poorfag? Lol that's crazy work. I bet you are a virgin.
>>82368522Women choose the bear.Except they don't in reality. It's virtue signalling and groupthink women will say whatever they think other women will want them to say, rather than what's true.Same reason they will say they feel safer walking through a ghetto full of blacks with machetes rather than live near a "far right" racist.In reality, if they was a bear near them and a white man, they would run to the white man to save them.And their choice of where to live indicates they are lying about who they feel safer to live around (these white middle class leftist women always live in safe majority white areas, far from the effects of the diversity that they worship).They will tell you they prefer a dad bod and find men with muscles scary. And that they want a nice man. But they will drop their panties when a literal criminal psychopath with big muscles and a 6 pack calls them a slutty bitch.NEVER listen to what women say, instead judge them by their actions.
Women as well as leftists don't understand the concept of saying something you don't actually believe, like making a point. And\or they're so emotional that they're jumping at the chance to attack.
>>82368450men have increased their standards because of porn.
>>82368566Very very true. It's all about following a narrative that the social circle dictates, rather than the truth.And for weakness and dishonesty like this, the 19th should be repealed.
>>82368406The only true love is between two men who are with each other. Men are not capable of loving a woman.
One of the worst things about women being retarded is that they're too retarded to self aware. They're literally too stupid to understand that they're stupid. And then they think they're right about something, but they're also too stupid to have a conversation about things.It's like when you give a woman the softest possible criticism, and they immediately emotionally react like "Ugh why are you being so mean.".
>>82368580which is probably the main cause of the male loneliness epidemic. they don't want to address this.
>>82368728Getting upset at you being "mean" when you just correct a tiny thing they're wrong about is so exhausting. Women just endlessly emotionally manipulate, they are just a walking bundle of out of control emotions, like toddlers in adult bodies.
>>82368740because once they address it, then they won't be lonely anymore.
>>82368791It's even worse when you understand why they do it.I think they act like that because of the social group thing. Women have ZERO morals or stances, it's all about the social group. So to their "allies", they're automatically nice, and to their "enemies", they're automatically rude.This is why women give their friends fake compliments all the time. It's a way of communicating "we're allies, we're on the same side".And so when a man who's ACTUALLY on their side, like her friend, boyfriend, husband, criticizes them, that's like communicating "we are enemies", hence why they respond like that.That's another way women are retarded. They don't understand the difference between a legitimate criticism and a vague insult. As in, they don't understand the difference between>Hey you did X, you shouldn't do it, be carefuland>Pfft your eyebrows are gross and weird Becky
>>82368807being "lonely" is their entire identity. without it, they would have nothing to attention whore about.
Always remember that this is what the people who bait you and call you incel online look like.Just fucking laugh every time you see them, knowing who's typing those words.
>>82368820>lonelyImagine the smell
>>82367388Total moid rape Women develop faster not to get with older men but to rape moids at the same age with ease
>>82368892>WIDDLEPeak. Men are seething.
>>82368450Low quality ragebait, roastie
>"I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: Oh Lord, make my enemies ridiculous. And God granted it." - Voltaire
>>82367388>Have any of you ever met or seen an ACTUALLY intelligent woman?After menopause, yes. I've met a few who were wise and reasonable. It's not the norm, just like it's not the norm for men, but they exist *after menopause*.The problem with young women is that they have a cursed menstrual cycle that turns their mental state into a rollercoaster. Attempts to tame this (with birth control for example) only lead to even worse hormonal imbalances and mental issues. It doesn't matter if they have a high IQ, they're basically schizo lites until their shit calms down later in life.
>>82368910Don't reply to bait posts.
>>82368578Okay but I'm far right and I believe in abortion as for eugenics Abortion has to be government mandated to keep humans in check, if not then you will get mutts Also by mandated I mean forced so if the parents want to keep it then too bad, you don't get to poison the earth with parasites
>>82368931You're responding to obvious bait.
>>82368930what does ash filled buckets mean? that sounds like a derogatory term towards black people, but shes calling a white woman that? can someone explain
>>82368926Sounds somewhat reasonable. I've seen women freak out during their periods for sure. Dunno about actually being wise after menopause, though.Is there any way to actually help them with their period shit, so they're not mentally unstable?
>>82368947Just be a decent person and not ab*se her, things will be much better.
Another way women are retarded: They're utter NPCs, incapable of original thought, so they just copy what they see others do. This usually manifests as them copying other women, but sometimes they'll copy things right in front of them, which results in grown women in their 20s and 30s unironically using "No u" and copying what the man just said to them.Just look at this example. Literal toddler level of comeback.>Women do X>N- no, MEN do X. G- got em, I win
>>82368947It's not just their period. It only becomes more apparent during their period because that's when it all crashes and they become impossible to deal with. The whole month is ups and downs every few days.
>>82368945Black people get ashy sometimes, and it's easier to see on them, so they give each other shit for it sometimes, even as a joke.The obese woman in the pic is so stupid and so insecure, that she's projecting and using an insult about black people, towards white people.Also, women don't understand confidence. They don't realize that actually confident people don't need to tell everyone how confident they are. Same for being good looking, powerful, rich, etc.
>>82368931But down syndrome people are the next step in evolution
>>82369001Alright, so what's the solution? Would them just becoming mentally stronger help? Surely there's something we could do.
>>82369010Don't reply to bait posts.Original comment, of course.
>>82367388>So, where are all the actually intelligent women?I've met one around these parts, capable of reasonably deep analysis in her field of choice. She can't put that to work at different facets of her life because she's got a bad (strong) case of female hormones going on. Oh, well.More's the pity.
>>82369010NT people are the next step in evolution, down syndrome is a bad thing.
>>82369033That cat is fucking huge look at it's skull. Roid cat
>>82367388Have you tried having any hobbies? I never see men in any of the groups I hang out in.
>>82367388My mom is pretty smart, shes great
>>82369019When was the last time you helped your wife with anything?
>>82369053Maybe, but I think it's just a perspective illusion, and its head is closer to the camera than it seems.
>>82369053It's closer to the camera. Things look smaller when they are further away, and bigger when they are closer.
>>82369037Any idea how to fix this? It seems that a lot of people do have some mental ability, but other shit like arrogance, ego, hormones, etc. gets in the way.
>>82369069I can believe that. I hope she's doing very well.
Every fucking time lmao.Originally oregano.
Fuck it, one more for the road. One for the men, this time.Can you believe people like this are actually real? Absolute onions overdose.
>>82369115>>82369118Are you guys retarded? It is hanging off the back of the couch and she is sitting on the couch itself, the woman is closer.
>>82369401She's just laughing about the "male loneliness" epidemic as if its real
>>82369401You just outed yourself as retarded.
>>82369458Don't reply to obvious bait posts.Guys, if a post sounds too retarded to be real, it's probably bait.
Now elaborate in detail all the concepts they do understand, great thread btw
>>82369458>>82369478The cat and the owner's faces are literally side by side are you guys like, trying to reverse troll me, it's weird
>>82369492They're good at manipulation. Though idk if that's due to intellectual ability, or them just copying other women being manipulative, and they just kept doing it cause it works. (And it also works because men have a biological programming to support women)I guess women are good at makeup, that's kinda something they have to learn. Though even that is manipulative and deceitful, and used to attention whore.
I don't like to insult people's looks, as that's not directly an argument, but one of my favorites is when clearly unattractive women project HARD and call men ugly\unattractive.
I guess this lines up with lack of self awareness, and thus low intelligence.The woman is highly insecure about her looks, so she insults men's looks, because she thinks the things she's sensitive about are the same things men are sensitive about.That's probably why they call men virgins and say they have a small dick. They're insecure about being sluts and having a loose vag.
>>82367388no smart woman would talk to you
So whats the root cause of all their conceptual deficiencies? Inability to comprehend interrelatedness?
>>82369595Damn. Mens rights were a big mistake.
>>82369665Men select women for beauty, women select men purely for intelligence. It's basic biology.
>>82369684Right, I meant what flaw did said processes result in that causes all the other issues
>>82367388>Have any of you ever met or seen an ACTUALLY intelligent woman? I haven't.Yes I have. My oneitis. She was probably autistic. Is a total slut. Has a career that gets her a lot of money and supposedly can't figure out why nobody wants her. But it could be a lie cause she had a phase where she was lying to me the whole time but supposedly she no longer does that. Supposedly she hates other women. And she used that intelligence to arguably hurt me the most out of all women I ever knew because I turned her down when we were kids. It is a long story...
>>82369665It's probably a mixture of multiple factors.One, there's a genetic component, just from being a woman.Two, society coddles and supports them, so they don't have a need to develop intelligence. Ever see female stand up comedy? Everyone just laughs and claps even if she's unfunny, so she never knows what's actually funny or not.Three, women's runaway egos and arrogance prevents them from fully using any intelligence that they actually have.Four, their lack of accountability leads to even less feedback, less improvement, and less development.Probably other factors too.
>>82367545That poster is definitely retarded, but communist isn't about "giving people money". That's an idiotic neoliberal utopian concept. Communism is about abolishing/sublating the power dynamics via the progressive acquisition of the means/mode of production into the hands of the working class. Ideally, stocks shouldn't even exist; each worker would automatically possess a voice in how the enterprise is run
>>82369743that voice would effectively be a stock in the company. and if all voices are equal (or based on labor theory of value) then nobody is actually running the enterprise. you can't be the child and also the parent at the same time, humans exist in hierarchies just by existing.
>>82369727>supposedly can't figure out why nobody wants herDoesn't sound very intelligent.>she used that intelligence to arguably hurt meI don't think that counts as intelligence, as being malicious and manipulative comes naturally to women. It's like saying a dog is smart cause it knows how to bark.No offense, but why do you even like this chick? Sounds like she's on the mentally ill hoe path. Gotta improve your standards man.
>>82369743>each worker would automatically possess a voice in how the enterprise is runBut that doesn't make much sense, because most of those people probably don't have managerial skills, so their voices wouldn't be productive. Not to mention how it'd just result in voting for policies, and it'd just become an indirect election.>the progressive acquisition of the means/mode of production into the hands of the working classWhy haven't any people who believe in communism actually done this with a company?
>>82369764>Doesn't sound very intelligent.That is why I said supposedly. She might as well be lying about this because she is smart. And what I meant with using intelligence to hurt me is that I do agree all woman do that but she definitely used her smarts to do it even better than an average woman. I am over her and I don't intend to speak to her ever again at this point but I am sure she was the most intelligent woman I ever knew and she was more intelligent than a lot of guys I work with right now (engineer).
>>82369743I wanna point out the inconsistency of you criticizing utopias, while talking about an unrealistic ideal hypothetical situation, that in practice would self destruct instantly.
>>82369665Being unable to distinguish the interrelatedness of things is arguably the source of all the other problems that arise in their defective mindset if you think about it. Simple as.
Another reason to repeal the 19th, whenever women have power, they ALWAYS abuse it.Women have the advantage in dating, so they hold it over men's heads, and attack men with sexual insults, like "small dick", "virgin", "can't please a woman".Ironically they're very sensitive to the same kind of insult, like "loose roast beef pussy" and "slut". Which just shows their instability.
>>82369901There is no "male loneliness epidemic"
More like "molested in her youth so now she's mentally ill and hates men" hoe epidemic lmao.
>>82369934LMAO probably molested by a man too, it's many such cases.
>>82369807You would have a point if cooperatives didn't exist or always failed. That's clearly not the case.
They're inevitably on the autistic spectrum, yes.Autistic women actually come across as human. It's wild.
>>82369947Maybe they don't always fail, but are they more common than normal companies? If not, why not? That's the real question. Surely there's a reason one way or the other, cause you know if coops were the better method, they'd be all over it.
Women are so stupid that they will spend 10-15 years repeatedly going for Chads out of their league, having casual sex with them, and then complaining that they couldn't get a relationship with them.They will do this over and over, without analyzing where they went wrong, and will hate all men because of her own actions.There's also a pattern of women blaming all men for the actions of the top 10% (which are the only ones they consider men), like saying all men cheat.
>>82369981They're not more common because they are focused on worker satisfaction and not maximizing investors' bank accounts. I'm well aware that coops can't really compete with regular companies on a wide scale because of greed; I am just pointing out that communism isn't just "giving people money" or when the government does a thing
>>82370041I suppose that's a fair point.I gotta ask, isn't what you're suggesting still capitalism, but just capitalism with better working conditions?
>>82370064Depends on what you mean by "capitalism". It seems like a lot of people conflate "capitalism" with private/civilian enterprise when it's actually just one section of workers owning the means of production to the exclusion of others (which we call private property). Communism/socialism seeks to flatten that hierarchy.
>>82367388>Have any of you ever met or seen an ACTUALLY intelligent woman?Yes. Exceptions don't disprove the rule though.
>>82370117Socialism is just capitalism without the good parts.
>>82368185> Draw the water level after the glass is tipped> afterHow long after?Immediately?Half a second?Ten seconds?
>>82370623It makes no difference lol. What are you thinking?
>>82370725Water sloshes and splashes, it also depends on how fast you move the container.
>>82370758OK I see. You can consider the glass to have a lid if that helps and wait as long as you like. It's just about gravity and containers basically.
>>82369665I think it's the lack of intuitive understanding of statistics. A larger proportion of women seem to have issues dealing with very emotional situations that are rare. You see this when they try to comprehend disturbing events in the news and aren't able to properly see how the issue isn't widespread and relevant to their lives. They're the primary victims of the "think of the children" type of argumentation, where emotional impact of a rare and localized event tricks them into acting as if they were common and widespread. You also see them tend to say things like "not all X are like that" when you try to explain how something happens more frequently in one population than another. They'll identify that there exists at least one individual within a population in each classification but their brain short circuits when trying to evaluate the relative proportions of these groups.I'm not sure what causes this, it may be that a mans superior visuospatial mental functions also give them the mental tools to easily perceive relative frequencies of imagined distributions. If men can more easily imagine quantities of items in their mind of a certain order of magnitude or accurately imagine/predict ratios of perceived groups of items this could give them a more intuitive understanding of statistics that women tend to lack.
