>incest is supposedly illegal because it will produce fucked up offspring>but midges are allowed to breed and racemixing is legalCurious.
>>82410909>but midges are allowed to breed and racemixing is legalNot for long.Will be outlawed this century. Eugenics will be taking off int he next 20-30 years and become mainstream alongside actual fascism.
I've never seen concrete proof that incest causes deformities or diseases, and it really doesn't make sense that it would
>>82410936It does, but you can fuck your brother, have his kids and they'll probably be fine, but if your kids fuck eachother and have kids then they'll probably be okay too, but if it happens again then things start going wrong, especially if its gen after gen after gen
>>82410909DeNiro... wjat jave you done
>>82410909would have a go w the daughter DESU
>>82411051So it's another "trust me bro" situation just like the idea that microbes cause disease
>>82410909why did warwick do it? i mean hes a rich actor, im sure he could have scored some mid tier roastie and had normal kids
>>82410936Isolated incidents of incest are bad but generally fine if its an anomaly.Repeated generations of incest is the real problem. Just look at the hapsburgs or muslims and you see what generations of it does.
>>82410909>incest is supposedly illegal because it will produce fucked up offspringIt's also hardcoded in your DNA to directly prevent you from finding family members attractive, it's called the Westermarck Effect. It quite literally goes against biology, you retarded faggot.
>>82411051>>82411107It's very unlikely for siblings to fall in love multiple generations in a row, and even if they did we have a concept of danger from incest and we'd be able to avoid having kids if it did happen. It's obviously worse if races with worse genes like jews/arabs/jeets do it even once, but arguably them breeding at all produces worse products than any case of incest.
>>82411134Yet you can't point to the Westermarck gene.Are you a retard or a teenager?
>>82410909midgets are illegal
