[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/r9k/ - ROBOT9001
Return Catalog Bottom Refresh
Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.
[Advertise on 4chan]
[Return] [Catalog] [Bottom]
Anonymous Archived
09/10/25(Wed)01:14:00 No.82456268
Anonymous 09/10/25(Wed)01:14:00 No.82456268 Archived
>In America, a female who isn't a fat retard slob is immediately considered """beautiful""" (which is a lie).

>However, this does not apply to the man.

I don't ever want to hear about ""harmful beauty standards for wemon"" ever again. fuck you and your faggy "media induced anorexia" becky we do NOT care
>>
Anonymous
09/10/25(Wed)01:33:34 No.82456402
Anonymous 09/10/25(Wed)01:33:34 No.82456402
men can afford to want to fuck multiple women
women can't afford to fuck multiple men
>>
Anonymous
09/10/25(Wed)02:47:00 No.82456915
Anonymous 09/10/25(Wed)02:47:00 No.82456915
File: 1733908411538.jpg (159 KB, 794x1024)
159 KB
159 KB JPG
Why were we tricked into 'caring' about "harmful beauty standards" for women when the male is still pretty much the disposable slave in heterosexual eros?

Why would I care about some teenager whore's anorexia when men get judged for less and things that are genetic?
[Return] [Catalog] [Top]
Post a Reply
Return Catalog Top Refresh
[Advertise on 4chan]
Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.