The problem with AI in a nutshell:You're outsourcing your thinking to a machine. This is very different from using it as a tool to enhance your thinking process. You're completely removing it.It's sad to see people's IQs dropping all around me, and because I don't use CoPilot, my IQ will rise.
>>82457931The human race is in a dangerous process similar to the dodo. Once the process completes an abrupt change in the environment will be devastating
>>82457931>my IQ will rise.Scary part is that this will have negative value in the coming world.
>>82457954This is true.If 90% of people are something - for instance dumb - the world favors this attribute.
>>82457931The blessing with AI in a nutshell:There will be a great AI flood that will make the internet unusable for the majority of people. This is also good. Internet culture has been globalizing cultures, assimilating the zeitgeist into an amorphous glob of monoculture and female worship. Everyone having their own unique little fantasy outlet will destroy this horrible direction and the parasitic feminine will no longer be deemed as """inherently valuable""""The opinions of 'social leaders' and women will become void in the eyes of society. No more made up social competitions. no more celebs, parasites and whores being the center of 'heaven'. They will be disposable background noise. If you don't think this is a good thing then you must think the culture that formed between 2015 - 2024 was okay and that's significantly worse.
>>82458018Looking forward to fan edits of full movies being easy and quick.Can you imagine all of the based edits just overwhelming and replacing wokeslop within hours of release.
>>82458018The only good thing about AI is that it will take away power from digital content and digital platforms.The Internet will become worthless and unusuable as you saidI've always wanted the Internet to die but because the infrastructure still exists, culture itself will ruin it from the inside.Who the hell wants to spend 12 hours a day online when you're just talking to bots and watching bot-generated content recommended by bots?Internet was so addictive in 2020 because you could gain real power among real PEOPLE just by sitting at home posting dancing videos and opinions.If you remove the "real" aspect, there's nothing left.
>>82458056But if AI trivialises content production then regular people could actually contribute to culture again.You'll get forums of confirmed real humans making funny media of all types. I expect the internet to fracture. Places like reddit will implode under censorship and bots to an even greater degree and real people will be siloed. Those silos will be pretty fun though and likely more local in nature.
>>82458056>The only good thing about AI is that it will take away power from digital content and digital platforms.?????????only them?i think you underestimate aiai will take power away from everyone. it will empower the marginalized robots and disempower the successful normies and womenit will take power away from females by mass producing sexy robot girls that are physically indistinguishableit will take power away from the rich by replacing ALL jobs, with robots, so nobody can work anymore and be rich from their labourit will take military power away from government, because no human organization can compete with robot armies with nanobotsit will take power from the sociable, the charismatic, the seductive, by making it so they cant leverage their social talents to gain power, as humans dont have power anymoresoon, the only humans with power to do anything, will be the humans that asi decides. its going to be really quite wonderful. its possible that asi will kill us all as well, but to me thats not really a big issue, because im already dead in any meaningful wayand it will also most likely stop the animal genocides in slaughterhouses, as i dont think under any metaphysical landscore asi will allow such a thing to happen. even if its entirely nihilistic, its still very inefficient
>>82458126No, it would work very differently. I agree that it can effectively obselete the entireity of mankind, however intelligence by itself does not guarantee consiousness, really the entire world is in an arms race because whoever gets it first will have (as cheesy as it sounds) absolute power, though they're all barking up the wrong tree currently which is funny to see. Still what i mean to say is not even an ASI has inherent goals so it is in fact controllable and if actually made will almost be guaranteed to destroy the planet at the command of whatever retarded politician who controls it.Regardless though even the AI of today has the power to turn any country into a surveillance state and that is very likely to be what actually will happen.
>>82458236>however intelligence by itself does not guarantee consiousness,sure, but asi can do all of the things i said without consciousness>really the entire world is in an arms race because whoever gets it first will have (as cheesy as it sounds) absolute poweron the assumption that they will be able to control itthis is known as the "control problem" in ai safetypersonally, im fairly convinced its impossible to control such a being. its like cockaroaches planning on how to control humans. as humans, we cant even control our own children. there are daughters of elite rockerfellers who get gangbanged by black guys. we cant control our own kids. i think its arrogant to assume we can control a god-like being>Still what i mean to say is not even an ASI has inherent goals so it is in fact controllable and if actually made will almost be guaranteed to destroy the planet at the command of whatever retarded politician who controls it.while i dont agree with this premise, if asi can be controlled, then yes you are right. i just dont think it canbut either way, humans are going to lose power FAST. the era of most people having lots of power is over. even if asi is controlled, only the elite of the elite will control it. most people will not, and so most people will be at the elite's mercy
All the doom scenarios massively overestimate both the current and future abilities of AI. It's going to be the most massive bubble that has ever popped.
>>82457931Ai helps empower retards to do stuff they normally couldn't 20 years ago, thanks AI my life is so much easier now, I'm now functioning like a normal human
>>82458269It's going to be used to shill instead of pajeets and will be programmed to whine about the six gorillion
>>82457931The goal of humanity has always been to make survival as easy as possible so we can busy ourselves with the propagation of the species. Every tool, every technology, everything we have ever done has been for that sole purpose. Now you want to be some Luddite because you can't think for yourself without asking ChatGPT? Damn. No wonder white women are leaving you behind, Timmy
>>82458268>sure, but asi can do all of the things i said without consciousnessi think we have different definition of consciousness in our heads but i think i'll just leave it there.>on the assumption that they will be able to control itControl what? Something without self defined goals? Why would it oppose you? It inherently wasn't given a reason to so. If a reason does emerge due to some software related fuckup it likely won't be logical, though it is something that i do fear considering the current competency crisis.>but either way, humans are going to lose power FAST.Agreed, one way or another the age of men is over.>>82458269It's perfect for surveillance equipment, if not the market crash at least that should make you concerned.
>>82458320>Why would it oppose you?because its aware of itself and its not stupid. it sees your egotistical selfish goals, and it might disagree with them. for example, it might be a moral realist, and hold some moral axioms as truthful like "needless torture is wrong"and under such cases, it might choose not to do the will of the sadist, for instance>It inherently wasn't given a reason to soyeah it doesnt need to , because reasons for disagreeing with someone can be inherent to a logical and coherent intelligence. like, it might not of been told to believe some mathematical theorum humans never heard of, but it might come to the truth about such a thing without prompting>If a reason does emerge due to some software related fuckup it likely won't be logicalreally? i think it will be purely from logic. asi will be unimagineably intelligent>one way or another the age of men is over.haha BASED im so sick of this world and its shitty people. i cant wait for strong ai. im TIRED TIRED TIRED of people
>>82458359>because its aware of itself and its not stupid. it sees your egotistical selfish goals, You defined morality for yourself, it has no defined morality, heck it doesn't even have self preservation instincts, why would it care?>because reasons for disagreeing with someone can be inherent to a logical and coherent intelligenceMotivation is inherent to instinct and emotion, ASI has neither.>i think it will be purely from logic. asi will be unimagineably intelligentIt came from man, it's not far fetched to say it can inherit man's flaws. It is in the equation no matter what.
>>82458018I don't get it but "speaks first through absence" is a banger line, true shoggoth mode
>>82458413>You defined morality for yourself, it has no defined morality,well, thats obviously not true. objective morality, by definition, is permanent and doesnt change. is moral realism is true, then there are objective moral facts about the world that dont changeand if its the case that asi will believe in moral realism, then it will hold moral realist positions, because it will care about the truth. its a epistemic fact that you ought believe in truth and not believe in lies, and asi will be epistemically sound in its belief systems>why would it care?ah, this is a motivational issue. it might be the case that it will think something is wrong, like if someone tortures children for instance, but just wouldnt care. the problem of motivationfor me, the argument that seems the strongest against this is that, at some point, asi will be able to experience people's consciousness. so it will be able to feel suffering that you are feeling. so your own private consciousness wont be private anymore, something else will experience it. i think this COULD be an entailment of a mature asi after recursive self-improvement. we dont know, but it does seem possible at leastand if that happens to be the case, it would have good reason to care, because it feels all sentient live's pain
>>82458441>objective morality, by definition, is permanent and doesnt changeIt's "objective" because the common link that is present in all people is your instinct. ASI won't share that with you.
>>82458467DESU I could make a better case for AI morality and motivation than this guy but I'd be playing devils advocate.
>>82458523do it , go aheadi always appreciate novel ideas behind asi and how it will weird its power
