>1995>a company entirely made up of attractive women software developers>they're not even shown to be overly technically capable or experts, just fairly competent and vibe coding.>they smell like spring>they are all unapologetically feminine>being the only man there is the ultimate computer geek male fantasywhy do tech bros hate women now? i dont get it. more importantly how do i land this job?
>>82467913>competent and vibingDelusional
>>82467913They are all female because the writer wanted to have a hot female executive.
>>82467913>>He fixes and improves the computer system.>>They fall in love just because.And the same thing happens with other women in other jobs, such as at the swimming pool, etc. It's an anime for ultra-autistic beta freak coomers.Hahahaha, it's obvious that it's just a fantasy for coomers...
>>82467913Vibe coding was not a thing back then, anon. You're losing it.
>>82467913>vibe coding>1995What?
>>82467913WOOWWWWOWW! TO BE THE /ONLY/ MALE EMPLOYEE IN A COMPANY FULL OF BEAUTIFUL BABES LIKE THAT ... LED BY THAT BEAUTIFUL GODDESS OF A WOMAN ON THE LEFT? A GUY COULD REALLY LEARN A LOT!!! SOOOOO EDUCAAATIONALLL!!!!!
>>82467913>more importantly how do i land this job?you dont the days of bullshit money writing software is over do real engineering
>>82467913this show was kino
>>82469508i wish there was a thing where you were allowed to retrain and do something else without some long winded degree or an apprenticeship that only allows teenagers.I'd make a banging engineer. Instead stuck as a science bro.
>>82467913Have you ever actually been the only (or one of the few) males in a predominantly female office space? All the women fucking hate each other, it's hilarious. You're instantly the most productive employee for the simple fact that you're not engaging in drama. Women never emotionally mature out of a mean girl mental age of about 15
>>82467913>1995You can't. Women who practice STEM only enroll in nursing programs. Have you ever seen an attractive female coder, anon? No?
>>82468062Its a comedy
>>82470252No, really...? I see you haven't understood what I said, kike.
