Would you rather be handsome and short or be ugly and 6 foot tall?
>>82473839Ugly and tall, I would have the genetics to be better at fighting, longer reach combined with more bodyweight and training and most people wouldnt fuck with me, its just better, ruck better, carry more ammo
>>82473873How tall are you currently?
I'm a 6'2 uggo, so short and handsome.
>>82473839This question is oxymoronic on so many levels. Next, you're going to ask me if I'd rather be a sexhaving virgin or a virgin sexhaver.
>>82473901I'm only asking is because I'm both ugly and short lmao
>>824738925 7 if I was around 5 11 to 6 2 and my genetic potential would be good enough to cover any and all
>>82473935I'm almost the same height (5'6") I'm in good shape except my height. Why did God have to nerf me so bad lol
>>82474038Maybe you were tall in your past life and decide this time you wanted a harder difficulty
I am handsome and short, women don't go for me. The ugliest, smelliest, most immature tall men I know swim in pussy. While I can pull the attention of a few select women who see me as their type, the majority of women barely even see me as a man. Even if I'm taller and larger than them. Almost all of the romantic attention I get is from gay tops.Before you ask, 5'6.
>>82474127Keep hustling, keep grindinh. Build an empire, bro! WAGMI! You just need to learn le game
>>82473839handsome and short so i could convincingly troon/ twink out
Im ugly and tall and still havent got laid
>>82473901virgin sexhaver by far.
>>82473839Kek so funny the manlets here coping thinking they look real good and its their height that holds them back, no retard, if you were actually handsome being 5'7 wouldnt affect you in shit
>>82474907>5'7It's still average height, you retard.
>>824749245'4 5'3 if you were ACTUALLY handsome it wont do shit coper
>>82473839I am handsome as described by other people and I'm on the stockier, endomorph side. women don't leave me alone, I don't know what all this hate on short guys is about but it's a very online phenomena. in real life, there is a shortage of handsome men in general, so whether you're short or tall you will score with women whether they're milfs or college chicks. either you didn't put in enough work to become attractive or you're working with bad product, but being tall or short won't change much. it's also about what you eat and how you're built. I can't just eat anything I put on weight too easily, but an athlete with a mesomorph build can eat whatever he wants. play with what you have and look for small ways to improve that one way or another. when all the small wins accumulate one day you'll look back and shake your head at the thought that there was something wrong with you. it's mostly in your head.
>>82473839It depends on how short and how ugly we're talking - deformed ugly and a flat 6'0 vs model tier face and 5'8 I'll take handsome and short. If we're just talking mid ugly, objective 5-6 woman 2-3, and we're talking Short as fuck like 5'2 then I'm taking tall and ugly. Assuming a "fair" interpretation, it's necessarily a wash with women - tall and kind of ugly vs handsome and kind of short will be roughly the same. In the case where either choice's sexual options are equivalent because the factors are balanced in this way, I'm taking tall and ugly because that will be better for auxiliary social reasons and physical strength etc.
>>82475043Would you rather be a 5'4" Alain Delon or 6'4" Bob Odenkirk?
>>82475067Bob easily, as he's objectively not all that bad looking at all. He's a famous actor, not of the "ruggedly handsome" type but he's not what I would ugly. He's mostly symmetrical etc and looks fine. Not even aging that bad.
six foot isn't tall
>>82474876Fuck off. I was speaking rehitorically. Neither option makes any sense. There's no difference between a virgin sex-haver and a sexhaving virgin and they're equally gibberish claptrap utterances.
