Explain to me how picrel doesn't completely and totally btfo anti-lolifags.
>its not a naked child > its just a DEPICTION of a naked child face the wall, please
>>82474475>move a pencil in a certain shape on a piece of paper>you must dieNormalfags are really crazy.
A video recordings of a real-life pipe would also not be a pipe.
>>82474516video recordings are wrong because they require the actual act to occur in the first place. It's true thhey aren't the actual thing, same as a drawing, but in order for them to be created someone must actually DO the thing unlike a drawing.
>>82474516Correct.>>82474528It's wrong for the person who created it.
>>82474533yes, but it's also wrong for the people viewing it because you're directly supporting the person who created it.
>>82474528but then you can spin that arguments that suspiciously true to life loli-artists seem to get their proportions a little too right for it to be pure fictionpoint is there's no winning these kind of argument and in the end its you as an individual that sets the line for your moral boundaries
>>82474538I mean sure, it is pure conjecture at the end of the day, but there is some implications through law. I don't think you can build a legally sound argument based on the "correctness" of a loli drawing. Besides that comes back to a whole other part of this discussion. Anime drawings don't look like people, at least perfectly so. They are intentionally different.
>>82474536How are you directly supporting it? If you are not paying money or assiting in production there is no wrong.
>>82474716Spreading something is also supporting it.
>>82474740That's assuming you assist in distribution somehow. A lot of laws were made during a time when distributing meant producing or being in direct contact with producers because the internet didn't exist yet or was still in its infancy.
>>82474764I'd say even if you only took a copy for yourself and didn't pay anyone or even let anyone know you took it, which would be supporting it by showing demand for it, you can still be potentially supporting it. You could distribute it. You could get money for it. All of which would show demand for the product, which we know inevitably increases supply. Loli doesn't have such strings attached for a number of reasons. Because of the obvious stylistic differences from life like imagery. Because of the fact that the piece was created without directly causing those horrific acts.
