Did anyone watch Looksmaximus back in the day? I find it strange they banned him from everywhere. His message was one of rejecting politics, religion, ideologies, marriage, child rearing, essentially everything you would think the system already seems to want. Basically from his perspective none of these things benefit the male in modern gynocentric times and he frequently used historical examples to highlight why such things made sense in the past but not now. The examples he used to compare the past to the present are similar to the ones incels present. Instead of trying to change the world, he was looking to teach men how to operate in it and maximize all our base male desires with the least amount of downsides. The underlining theme being no humiliation rituals for women because it destroys you as a man, puts you in a subservient state of mind. I can only assume that's exactly why they banned him. The idea that a non-chad male gets what he wants without humiliating himself and being subservient was just too far.
>>82484631>maximize all our base male desiresFucking ladyboys?
>>82484660He didn't like ladyboys but yes, fucking escorts was a key part of his message. lol. You believe this lowers you as a man because you have been conditioned by the gynocracy into believing you need the validation of women to get off. You are a "beta male" if not. However, he points out in one of the most androcentric societies to ever exist, Rome, the alphas fucked escorts regularly. They did not give a fuck about the opinions or validations of women. They were holes.
>>82484631>His message was one of rejecting ideologiesthe problem with this is its inherently contradictory. this is a ideology. and a holding a ideology of rejecting ideologies is contradictoryi like this guy because he had a hair system and rejected political authority, but i do believe he's a bit too much of a hedonistic nihilist. but in general i think cooming lots is great, just not so nihilistic. hes weird and has idiosyncratic views, which is always something to appreciate, but personally im not particularly a big fan of long streamsrejecting politics is a great thing to do
>>82484692>He didn't like ladyboys but yesOh sweet summer child
>>82484770The guy stuck vibrators up his ass to stimulate the prostate. Something tells me he would be open about fucking ladyboys if he liked them. Either way, I don't care if he did. You stop caring about smear campaigns like this when you reject the hierarchy males are desperately trying to find a place in at the expense of other males. It's all in the name of pigeon dancing for women. That's what you are doing.
>>82484631Apart from the steroid usage, he had a good message. Way better than the blackpillers message.
>>82484631Women will tell to ugly and poor men, Good look and money is everything and it's over.Women will tell average men, personality, masculinity, feminist and emotional stability is everything and do be cheap and do personal hygiene, one good girl will be someday.Women will tell rich men, money is everything and saying than money thing want.Women will tell attractive men only want sex, and hope sex with them.Now men groups on internet just told to men women want sex with hot men and use money/support of other men without give sex or give minimum bad sex.And women absolute hate internet men groups.
