>>82641709
The west has fallen in the original sense of the term

all the women around me are ugly whores, I'm not wasting my massive cock on any of them

>>82641709
I was in college during that bump and I'm still a virgin, it's truly over for me isn't it?

>something something sex or women WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON???
finally my slop trough was empty

>>82641709
It turns out the "free sex" movement wasn't so free. Everyone moved away from God, which left them depressed and aimless. Depressed aimless people don't have sex.
Because there's no reason.

Find God.

>>82641754
It's just men. The rate for women hasnt changed

>>82641754
unfortunately god is obsessed with hiding within his divine hiddenness so i cant find him

>>82641709
maybe definitional change. maybe people used to think masturbation counted as sex and oral sex was sex until bill clinton and monika

>>82641797
Nah, Bill Clinton famously said that he didn't have sex with that woman.

>>82641831
my point. monika sucked him off it wasn't sex. he's also probably on the epstein list but only got sucked off so he's in the clear

It's white, asian and indian guys. Everyone else has no problems

Interesting. How many women are obese or overweight?

>>82641709
>What the fuck is happening
Didn't you know? Fuck apps and social media ruined everything since the early 10s, and created the ever-growing male inceldom boom. It let foids go unashamedly Chad-only, to the total detriment of everything. They just ignore their (now-incel) looks-matches and now averagecels are a thing.
Interesting to see that there was a fuck boom during the 2008 cataclysm. The post-pandemic increase was nothing compared to that.
So with inceldom and globalism/outsourcing only getting worse this past decade and a half, it's no wonder that people are miserable.
God forbid that the mainstream media ever admit that incels were right about everything, and predicted that this would only get worse.
Now inceldom and the Black Pill is basically mainstream.

>>82641709
Everyone else is fucking wrong, it's the decline in sex hormones in both sexes.
In women, due to birth control fucking up their natural production, and in men a complex of reasons that lower testosterone including microplastics, obesity, and processed food.
No matter what, if people actually had the correct amounts of estrogen & testosterone, they'd be fucking, but they don't have sex drives. Probably 50% of people are weird sexless blobs who just work at Walmart, smoke weed, and watch Netflix.
5% of people are Chads and Stacies (healthy people) who fuck all the time.

>>82642960
Agreed but it's not just health, broke men are just a pussy repellent.

the female sex rate is the same
the amount of sex females have is stable, theres only a limited amount of it and its stable
its just that a fewer and fewer amount of men are getting sex

hypergamy is becoming more and more normalized, and normies are getting priced out of the dating market

>>82642978
Broke men can go fuck broker women. But they don't. Mr 320 pounds with the testosterone of a 93 year old and knee pain at 22 isn't gonna fuck anyone.

>>82642997
>and normies are getting priced out of the dating market
Finally normies are getting taste of their own medicine.
Glorious.

>>82642833
Women now can connect with any guy all over the world. They don't need to deal with your 2/10 (in her mind now) ass. Theres a hottie guy in Finland willing to fly her out and show her the sights and fuck her the whole week. Women don't need you anymore. You are now nothing to them.

>>82641709
>What the fuck is happening
Brown hands making threads

>>82643011
yeah idc about normies honestly let god raindown hellfire on this god forsaken earth its horrible

>>82641709
Men who want sex more than once or twice a month are fucking disgusting, especially if they aren't making lots of effort to be top tier attractive. Sex is nice, as a special occasional thing. But when it's done very often, it isn't special and it's just the guy being a little horndog freak, acting like a teenager. Mature men aren't supposed to want that childish sort of shit.

>>82643067
Fuck that shit. I'd fuck multiple times every day, if I had the chance. I just don't want to get them pregnant.

>>82641709
Plot obesity rate on the same graph and it will be obvious.

>>82641709
Feels good to be in the 37%

File: 1410039127034.jpg (67 KB, 530x444)

67 KB JPG

>>82641709

'Tracks'

I'm 40/m

Had sex once when I was 37.

'know that i'm an outlier and my exerience isn't like the general population ect ect

>>82641787
>>82642997
The survey is for all adults if all the women were having sex it would be 50%

>>82643114
numbers would be quite different if grannies were excluded

>>82643067
it's less about being mature and more about how healthy you are an genetics. the more healthy and active you are the higher your sex drive, has nothing to do with maturity.

File: virginity_male_and_female_2021.png (59 KB, 599x482)

59 KB PNG

>>82642997
Look at this pitiful incel cope. It's not true. In fact it's the opposite, there are more sexless women.

Facts, destroying incel narratives like always.

>>82641709
I'm a wizard. In my case:
>I'm scared to get a woman pregnant, so I would never have PinV sex, even with a condom. I don't want to destroy my life with a child and forced marriage and I'm not taking any chances.
>I don't have social media and don't use dating sites. And the women at my workplace are either old, taken or ugly. No other way of interacting with women besides work.
>I'm introverted and also opposed to becoming a provider, so even when some women show interest in me, I don't know how to flirt and I'm against marriage or pooling money together. When women can't take advantage of your money and resources, they don't really see the point in pursuing a relationship with you either.
>I have a porn collection and I really enjoy masturbation a lot, to the point where the effort, expense and risk of approaching/talking to/fucking women doesn't look worth it at all.
>I could go fuck escorts but I'm scared of STDs and as above, masturbation already feels too good for me to do any effort to get sex.
>I don't care about being a virgin. I don't feel like I'm missing out on anything. Whatever is good about sex comes at the cost of many risks and requires effort and spending I'm not willing to do.

>>82643028
Men now can connect with any girl all over the world.

>>82643169

can you provide the raw data?

File: fatty fatty fat fat fatties.jpg (77 KB, 865x508)

77 KB JPG

>>82641709
The more disgusting women get the more men who are themselves nowhere near as disgusting and animaloid become unwilling to fuck them.

Then you tack on their rampant social media generated narcissism and neuroticism and the end result is entities just as ugly on the inside as they are on the outside.

>>82643179
The source is there. Why do facts make incels so buttmad?

>>82643124
It's 18 to 64

I will never have sex because I am shy and afraid of women.

>>82641754
This. As it turns out treated something holy and sacred as cheap fun ruins things in the long run.

>>82643169
>[...] the proportion of 18- to 24-year-old individuals who reported having had no sexual activity in the past year increased among men (18.9% vs 30.9%; age-adjusted odds ratio [aOR] for trend across survey periods, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.04-1.39) but not among women (15.1% vs 19.1%; aOR for trend, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.89-1.18).

Women are not putting out to non chad men.

>>82641709
So they are still having plenty of sex. Seems like a non-issue to me, a virgin.

>>82643870
Got a legit source or is that just more incel pseudoscience?

>>82644088
Once a week is not what an ideal sex life looks like

This new data is **surprisingly** not divided by gender.... I wonder why. Totally not agenda lmao.

Somehow the previous was was divided by gender, but once everybody saw it's men not having sex ,not women, and it'd be beyond obvious many women fuck few men, there'd be riots.

>>82644550
That's still unfathomable amounts of sex

>>82644474
>incel pseudoscience
>literal studies
Just fuck off and die retard, you keep coming to r9k thinking you're some kind of genius, you're a literal redditor tier retard spewing obvious shit everywhere. Leave. Nobody cares.

>>82644559
>This new data is **surprisingly** not divided by gender.... I wonder why. Totally not agenda lmao.
Because there is hardly any difference.
>Somehow the previous was was divided by gender, but once everybody saw it's men not having sex
Why do you post lies on the internet? There is no such study. The only gender divided studies show there are more sexless women than men.

>>82644571
Are you going to post a source or not?

>>82644585
Not that anon, that's one, smug retard.
Second, you could find it within seconds if you knew how to use a search engine. You're fucking retarded. Not gonna spoon feed a reddit baby. Leave this site.

>>82644585
>>82644474
>literally put the quote into google
>it pops up first result
That anon is right, you're beyond retarded.

Get a gun and kill yourself.

>>82643169
>women
>self reporting
>women self reporting

Do you ever sleep?

>>82644595
>>82644607
>if I keep lying on the internet my incel wank fantasies will become reality

>>82644624
Funny how you never had a problem that study until the latest one which showed a shift to women being more sexless. Then you cry and whine and call it fake because facts destroy your incel cultist narrative.

File: tards.png (91 KB, 1104x721)

91 KB PNG

>>82644626
Are you an AI? There's no way you are a human. Nobody can be this low IQ.
I know there's a lot of bot activity here. Maybe some butthurt troon is running an AI chatbot on r9k because of those hekkin chuds. Or you're just braindead retarded.

>>82643169
Look at the numbers before Covid.

>>82644639
The study regardless of year says women are lying whores across time and space

>>82644658
You keep posting unsourced screenshots. You must be a bot because bots don't know how to post actual direct links. Why are you unable to link to that "study" so people can actually double check it?

>>82644720
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32530470/

>>82644742
The guy basically pulled numbers out of his ass. He doesn't even publish his source data. He doesn't explain why his numbers don't match all the other studies. The conclusion is written like a basement-dwelling incel's fantasy. Anyone with basic scientific literacy would see this is a very doubtful "study".

>>82644853
>Its bad because I dont agree wi- I MEAN because I say so
Okay einstein

>>82644720
>unsourced screenshots
You are retarded on so many motherfucking levels there isn't even a word to call out out stupidity. Consider suicide.

>>82644875
Probably a bot or a shill, ive seen him in other threads going on about no source despite them literally being at the bottom of those pics.
Most likely bot that cant read images but reacts to triggerwords

>>82643169
Women notoriously lie about their sexual activity

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00224490309552164
>When women believed they were hooked up to a lie detector, their mean reported number of sex partners rose from 2.6 to 4.4 sexual partners

>>82644894
I think it's the same tard that I've seen in several threads. They're always getting random studies from ChatGPT that don't even claim what they say it claims. Like once they cited a study claiming that IQ drops were due to environment and not genetics but the study they cited actually showed the opposite from the pure data. I don't know who it is buy they're stupid

>>82644864
Incels all have very low intelligence so it makes sense they have zero scientific literact.

>>82645021
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-022-02416-2
>In general, results showed that women considered taller men and men with larger SHR (shoulder-to-hip ratio) as more attractive, masculine, and better in fighting ability.

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2767063
>The percentage of 18- to 24-year-old men who were sexually inactive in the past year increased from 18.9% in 2000-2002 to 30.9% in 2016-2018.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40806-019-00215-y
>In both studies, men perceived sexual advances as less negative than women... the same behavior from an attractive or physically attractive actor is perceived as less harmful than from an unattractive actor.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2394562/
>fertile-phase women were particularly sexually attracted to men perceived as arrogant, intrasexually confrontative, muscular and physically attractive, no cycle shifts were observed in women's attraction to men seen to be successful financially, intelligent or kind and warm. Men who appeared to be sexually faithful were less sexually attractive to fertile-phase women

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S019188691500505X
>When women perceived themselves as more attractive than their mates, they also reported less commitment, more flirting with other men, more appealing dating alternatives, and more frequent thoughts about breaking up.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0146167214543879
>Studies 1 and 2 showed that men, but not women, perceived a responsive stranger as more gender typical (masculine/feminine) and, in turn, as more attractive.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333438272_Girls'_perceptions_of_boys_with_violent_attitudes_and_behaviours_and_of_sexual_attraction
>boys with violent attitudes and behaviours are mostly preferred for hooking up

>>82645120
foid pwned

>>82645120
And here comes the incel gish galloping. You are posting the usual low intelligence pasta, studies that either do not say what your summary says, or are outright fake.

Once again you are proving that incels are in the bottom 1% of intelligence. It is a cult that preys on the vulnerable and easy to manipulate.

>>82645180
Your concession is accepted. It's final and forever.

>>82645180
So prove the studies wrong. In the meantime here are some more

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00570.x
>Men's attraction was correlated with 12 characteristics including partner's conservatism, all Big Five dimensions except openness, anxiety, and self-esteem. For women, only two partner characteristics showed a correlation: physical attractiveness and sport activity.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-006-9075-x
>50% of undergrads reported having 0 sex partners

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886913000020
>women are not only more selective, but also more consistent, than men, in their partner height preferences. Women prefer, on average, a larger height difference between themselves and their partner men do... women are most satisfied when their partner was 21 cm taller, whereas men are most satisfied when they were 8 cm taller than their partner.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S019188691530060X
>A greater height difference in a couple was positively related to the wife's happiness. This relationship gradually weakened over time and entirely dissipated by 18 years of marital duration.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12110-006-1010-2
>male sexual motivation remains constant regardless of the duration of the partnership. Female sexual motivation matches male sexual motivation in the first years of the partnership and then steadily decreases

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/josh.12818
>Adolescents who were not in a romantic relationship had good social skills

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00224490309552164
>When women believed they were hooked up to a lie detector, their mean reported number of sex partners rose from 2.6 to 4.4 sexual partners

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1363/3923107
>Asian women 4x as likely to have an STD than Asian men

People were sex mad in the late 60s, 70s, 80s and 90s.

The steam from the sex revolution of the 60s has finally run out. It is over.

>>82645451
Gish galloping is when you have nothing but dishonesty and lies. Pick one and just one "study" which you think best proves your point. Incelism is without exception caused by low intelligence.

>>82645631
You are not doing good defending your case.

>>82645631
I gave you 15 studies to browse through. Debunk them and I'll take you seriously

>>82645777
I could give you 500 studies would you debunk them all? Why not? See that is gish galloping. Posting endless amounts of lies one after another and saying "see you can't disprove them all".

So, post one. ONE. You already tried earlier and got buttmad when it wad proven fake.

>>82641709
I know its a meme, but this is literally late stage capitalism. Sex, like every other resource, is a luxury now. You have people who get an abundance, those who get it once or twice every year or two, and those who never get anything.

>>82641709
Good thing we've had 60 years of feminism to funnel wealth and opportunities away from young men and towards women in order to pursue the lie that women want to be able to marry a kind and caring man for love, meanwhile in reality they're still incapable of loving a man for anything other than being hot or having money and status. Now they either have to get pumped and dumped by Chad with 10 other "girlfriends" for the former or by dudes 10 years older than them who only see them as a dumb sex receptacle for the latter.

>>82645790
>You already tried earlier and got buttmad when it wad proven fake
When the anon posted a single study, you merely claimed that the whole study was "a lie", didn't even give an example of alone part of the study which is dubious.
You "prove" anything.

>>82645823
Not to mention that feminists don't want to split 50/50 either

>>82645790
>lies
Prove that they're lies. It's a Sunday and you've been in this thread all day. If you're such an academic, then you should have no problem proving all of them wrong to Uber pwn the incels

>>82645746
All it can do is say I'm gish galloping, no actual reasoning to demonstrate how the studies are highly flawed or being misquoted

>>82645846
an example of one part*
you didn't "prove" anything*

>sex is the only important thing in this world!

>>82646353
Mister Straw will be obliterated

>>82645021
>Incels all have very low intelligence
There is an inverse correlation between intelligence and sexual activity.
You'd know that if you weren't retarded.

>>82646353
>>82645790
Kek nice same person

>>82643870
>but not among women (15.1% vs 19.1%;
That's an increase of 4%

>>82646497
>There is an inverse correlation between intelligence and sexual activity.
Nope. If there were incels wouldn't exist.

>>82646816
>aOR for trend, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.89-1.18
This basically means the increase amongst women is not statistically significant after adjusting for age and so on

>>82646846
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2418257122

Awaiting your master debunk. You still haven't done the other 15 studies yet

>>82645021
Hey I thought you were scientifically literate, why haven't you responded to any of the studies posted in this thread?

File: orbital-laser-yakuza7-orbital.gif (365 KB, 220x124)

365 KB GIF

i used to try hard to have sex, but now i just want the king to live - seems easier ...

i know that orbital lasers will save his life but he'd rather die and leave me alone desu

>>82645451
these are absolutely brutal. do you have anymore?

File: fvo1fs4wuai8alh_01G8XJ2NS(...).jpg (147 KB, 1680x799)

147 KB JPG

>>82644575
>The only gender divided studies show there are more sexless women than men.
I hate to be the guy who asks for a source. That would make me a bit more hopeful.
pic unrel

>>82648102
BlackPillScience on plebbit has plenty

>>82645790
>>82644853
This is basically why it's pointless to argue with foids.
The education system makes them think they are intelligent but this is all they can do in an argument
Post 1 source, they'll say it's bullshit.
Post several sources and they'll find an excuse to not have to address any of it.

You literally can't win, it's like trying to play Chess with a Pidgeon.

>>82649112
Kek so on point except women are just naturally retarded and can't critically think nor argue

File: roaste mic.png (428 KB, 1000x538)

428 KB PNG

>>82649928
>I don't like these stats, they might make women look bad!

>>82650434
Funny how the one in this thread made herself scarce after she got BTFO badly. They don't actually have responses to data, they just cite the cherrypicked sources that agree with them.

>>82643177
>Men now can connect with any girl all over the world.

Except women aren't choosing most men regardless of social media?

>>82643169
>there are more sexless women.
we certainly are entering the new era where women are becoming more sexless, it's quite the thing really. certainly appears that way to me, although i'm attractive so they all are thirsty for me, but since most women are in relationships and married and shit, all of the women wanting to lick my little butthole are all taken either with a boyfriend or married, it always makes me wonder why they aren't just fucking him instead, but alas here we are, it appears the answer is that most men have small cocks and/or don't satisfy them enough. i bet that's what we'll find out eventually about all of this