Apparently Isaac newton is forefather of Christian Zionism lol. Why did they never teach this side of him to us in school
I hate Christianity, Judaism and islam with all my heart
>>82670016though its still funny to see retarded palestinians get wiped
>>82670399No it's not kike this is why ur not white. You're incapable of actual morality and understanding nuance.
>>82670008He was also big into Alchemy, but it's not really relevant to modern times so they don't teach it. Galileo, Copernicus, and Giordano Bruno were also into some freaky shit but they glaze over that too because it isn't relevant. The 3 laws of motion, the law of gravitation, Newtonian fluids, refraction of light, and calculus are all you need to know about Newton to get your STEM PhD and start making money at a big company.
What they really don't tell you about is the fact these "figures" didn't actually come up with the ideas they published. They were rather upper-class almost nobility if not actual nobility who came into possession of information and had the means (money) to have it published and take credit for it. There are almost always multiple published works containing the same ideas, because, ideas are emergent phenomena that thousands of persons have at once as their knowledge and experience expands to provoke such emergence.Idolatry as such is defined as sin.
>Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under earth: Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments.This is a false version edited hundreds of times via ancient Greece but it roughly corresponds to the original philosophical assertion from the temple mount brought in legend by moses: DO NOT REPLACE REALITY (YHWH/god) WITH IMAGERY (abstract notions, images, writing.)YHWH means "it is what it is."Essentially the argument is due to the masculine language, "he", but "he" and "it" are equal. Drawing conclusions from the modern version with sexual bias is invalid. The original purpose was to simply say: "It is what it is."This is also known in modern times as the scientific method and philosophy of science.
Likewise a computer program in modern German is referred to as "he" and "his".
A "Model" in science is essentially the very statement asserted that you shall "not bow down to". In essence, it's an assertion that any model of reality is not per se reality itself. Reality must always be taken before the model and the model must be accepted as a false abstract representation of reality, not a mirror.
>Where do emergent properties such as the Heisenberg uncertainty principle come from? Are they evidence for a property of reality itself?No, the Heisenberg uncertainty principle is not emergent from reality. This limit is emergent from our sampling of reality and our use of units. Much like Benford's law is emergent from underlying properties of our mathematical systems and not due to properties of reality itself. Within our models we utilize samples, units, infinitesimals, infinities and so forth. The very properties of this method and models are exhibited in the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, not properties of reality.In philosophy, Platonism is a mistake and the source of these limits.
In Platonism the flaw is self-evident. Albeit this philosophy can be described as an assertion for the existence of units or symbols without units or symbols ... such can not be defined. Platonism itself faces up to an impossible task; defining a wholly abstract symbol without using another abstract symbol in reference. These indeterminate entities are merely taken "in faith" to exist without need for evidence of such.
Only one thing exists without requirement of proof:>It is what it is.
>>82670399>though its still funny to see retarded palestinians get wipedThe goal of the attack was a peer-to-peer egalitarian test of the moral aspects in their religious belief. For example "do not kill".https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beita_incidentThe discussion was "no loss of life is enough unless the movement is completely eliminated - so-called settlers occupying the military fortification are active combatants in an ongoing war and acceptable targets - we can hope innocent civilians will not be targeted directly."What the October assaults proved is that the religious morality of the israeli and palestinian youth is insufficient to prevent them from acting directly against commandments in opposition to YHWH.
