[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/r9k/ - ROBOT9001


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1759324519824.png (346 KB, 736x677)
346 KB
346 KB PNG
How come every daddy issues girl type is so boring? I don't know why but everytime I see one of those e-creatures, they always have just a very boring shitty personality.
The ones who are open about wanting to be beat and shit, too. It's like they're all boring and trying incredibly hard to fit in. Yes, I do mean that because a lot of them try to seem like they're far right or something. Some of them actually do hold those beliefs but it really doesn't make them any more interesting. They also tend to act like they're retarded. No, I really mean that, they act like it on purpose. Perhaps to sate their fetish about being a dainty weak retard girl who needs a caregiver or whatever.
I'm asking because I've met actually interesting and fun girls, I know they exist for a fact. Some who are legitimately far right as well. Not that this only extends to politics, mind you, it's just a pattern that I saw with them.
>>
dont date a girl that fits into a "type"
such gay shit
>>
>>82672772
>How come every daddy issues girl type is so boring?
Why/because I'll tell you why: It's because they're not trying to impress you and it's not worth the effort to them. Sorry to be bleak and shit but it is what it is dude.
>>
>>82672923
What? I don't talk to them but most of the posts they make are doing exactly that. They want to impress people and fail miserably. Do you even know what I'm talking about here or are you just pretending to know?
>>
Lol they just pretend to be into whatever I'm into and everything I say is interesting for a few weeks. Honestly I see them as less than human
>>
>>82672772
Girls live on tutorial mode, especially on the internet, so they're never forced to develop an interesting personality since men are the ones who approach them and entertain them for free.
>>
>>82672772
most notable thing about daddy issue girls is how common they are.
>>
>>82672772
I mean you literally answered your own question, it's because they are mentally ill.
>>
>>82672936
>Do you even know what I'm talking about
The world isn't all about you. You could die and nobody would fucking notice or ever care. Accept that, then try to express the things you want other people to know rather than getting enraged that we neither can nor want or care enough to bother reading your god damn mind.
>>
>>82672936
>I don't talk to them
Why the fuck are you whining? How the fuck do you know if they're interesting or not judging them as objects via fucking public internet posts? Are you the fat ass unshowered lard beast who screams at the bulletin board in the college courtyard and garden every day? You're not even a student, do I need to call the cops again to have you escorted off the property?
>>
>>82673005
>most notable thing about daddy issue girls is how common they are.
Same as daddy issues boys. Our culture says you can't express emotional warmth or familial love with children over the age of four or five without being "creepy". Kids this age find they're suddenly no longer able to access this sort of comfort and are emotionally damaged by the sudden discontinuity. This is where a majority of modern society's maladaptive social coping mechanisms are formed. These people often lose the ability to feel self-confident and form healthy emotional bonds or attachments later in life.
>>
When I was a kid that age, that's about when the physical abuse and beatings began. It's not considered precisely the same way to beat a female child so they get emotionally neglected as punishment instead. They form maladaptive strategies such as conflict avoidance and internalization.
>>
File: 1754062064817102.png (494 KB, 750x628)
494 KB
494 KB PNG
>>82673519
Unc seething and throwing a temper tantrum because he's too old to know what I'm talking about
>>826735483
>why the FUCK are you whining holy shit NO ONE CARES PLEASE STOP TLAKING ABOUT IT PLEASEE!!!!
Why not? Why are you getting so hostile over a simple observation? Are you one of the egirls that I'm talking about

>>82672958
Yeah it's seriously weird. It can't be that hard to just have an actual personality..
>>
>>82673641
>>why the FUCK are you whining holy shit NO ONE CARES PLEASE STOP TLAKING ABOUT IT PLEASEE!!!!
>Why not? Why are you getting so hostile over a simple observation? Are you one of the egirls that I'm talking about
meant for >>82673548
>>
>>82673588
Teaching a boy secure attachment when society expects him to be a self contained and stoic would be cruel anon.
>>
>>82673641
I didn't ask you to stop talking, I told you to talk. Why does that make you so uncomfortable? Can you deal with the fact that the world does not revolve around you and that neither do we have the capability nor care to read your innermost thoughts and emotions without them being explicated? I see you demonstrated avoidant behaviors, flailed wildly, attacking the person while failing to hide your fear of the subject of my post. You are acting as a coward. Face your fears and be strong instead of demonstrating weakness.
>>
File: 1756122453468601.png (102 KB, 374x298)
102 KB
102 KB PNG
>>82673746
Holy schizo meltdown
I make an observation about egirls in the incel board and now I have some retard spilling spaghetti over it
>I didn't ask you to stop talking, I told you to talk.
So you were both of the people that I was replying to? Damn calm down unc
>>
>>82673764
>I make an observation about egirls
The only notable element of any of your posts was this:
>>82672936
>What? I don't talk to them
Have you tried? Are you afraid to? Sour grapes right? They're not interesting, but, what are you here complaining for? Why are you complaining? What are these hidden innermost emotions or thoughts that you fail to express despite explicitly asserting your desire to?
>>
File: 1740125992796092.png (726 KB, 700x694)
726 KB
726 KB PNG
>>82673785
>The only notable element of any of your posts was this:
Didn't read the OP award
>What are these hidden innermost emotions or thoughts that you fail to express despite explicitly asserting your desire to?
Are you one of those psychology schizos that reads too much into someone just making a post on the internet
>>
>>82673798
>Are you one of those psychology schizos that reads too much into someone just making a post on the internet
Are you expressing self-deprecation and dismissing the importance of your expression of emotion? You posted here for a reason, let us know what it was. You told me there was something I did not understand. I read the entirety of your post, can you explicitly define what you believe I'm missing out on that you feel I ought to understand?
>>
>>82672772

>egirls
>personality

anon, you're not meant to date them. You're meant to fuck them a bit and ditch. The only people wanting to date egirl types are idubbzcels
>>
File: 1748931916321614.png (942 KB, 1406x1156)
942 KB
942 KB PNG
>>82673816
>what am I missing out on
The egirl part duh
>>82673820
Fucking and ditching is for hookuptard normgroids thoughever. Still, I agree
>>
Why do you not talk to them? Why do you insult them with your claim they do not interest you like the fox and its sour grapes only to post a thread solely to complain about them? You are obviously extremely interested in them but are expressing some form of despair here at being unable to form a connection with them. The obviousness of your expressed unfulfilled desire and despair are plain for all to see.
>>
I certinally wouldn't call them boring ime, more like emotionally unstable, a threat both physically and mentally but great in bed, like as hornier than me and up for just about anything when looking for male approval. At the same time many women have 'daddy issues', families aren't perfect. If people had loving parents like mine the world would be a lot nicer but way more 'boring'.
>>
File: 1758493221045746.png (361 KB, 763x637)
361 KB
361 KB PNG
>>82673841
You're the only one posting about this by the way, everyone else understood immediately when I described what I was talking about
>>
>>82673838
>The egirl part duh
You're wrong. I am not missing out on that. It refers to a person who uses the internet. A non-e-girl is possibly one in a million today because nearly every child much like yourself worldwide is currently using or has recently or soon will use the internet.

Did you want to express a more personal take on how you subjectively define the label you've used?
>>
File: moonmakeup.jpg (8 KB, 171x295)
8 KB
8 KB JPG
>>82673853
>everyone else understood
No one called you out on it, no one understood. I'm the only person who replied to you so far who cared enough to take what you said seriously.
>>
Girls with mommy issues scare the shit out of me personally idk about you guys
>>
>>82673881
>Girls with mommy issues
We call that BPD generally.
>>
File: 1728263385732695.png (1.06 MB, 734x1036)
1.06 MB
1.06 MB PNG
>>82673860
>>82673866
>it refers to a person who uses the internet... and nothing about what you said in the OP of course
See? You don't even understand what I'm talking about, and you're going absolutely fucking schizo that I called you out for it. It's okay to be too old for the internet, alright? Just don't get all autistic about it next time
>>
Now since you're a coward you're claiming that you were not serious. That you posted your post as a joke. You were not afraid, you were not confused. You asked your question rhetorically. You insulted no one because you used only vague hollow generalizations which no actual person could ever match.

Instead of being a coward, try be strong for once. Talk about things more deeply and you may get deeper, less shallow or empty replies.
>>
>>82673907
>See? You I don't even understand what you're talking about, and I'm going absolutely fucking schizo that you called me out for it. It's okay to be too old for the internet, alright? Just don't get me all autistic about it next time
Are you talking to yourself, Narci-chin?
>>
File: 1758336131080682.png (149 KB, 500x372)
149 KB
149 KB PNG
>>82673914
>please talk deeply and in good faith with me!! I might have thrown a huge temper tantrum in your thread over getting told that I was wrong but YOU'RE STILL OBLIGATED TO REPLY TO ME IN GOOD FAITH
>>82673935
>Narci-chin
So it actually is one of those psychology freaks who thinks everyone on the internet is a narcissist
>>
You virgins have it hard I guess but your maladaptive copes really aren't working well. Okay son, I love you.
>>
>>82673952
So you're angry I trashed your thread. I'm not angry, I'm happy. Why do you think I'd do such a cruel thing to such an innocent boy?
>>
>>82673881
>>82673884
witnessing someone have psychotic/schitzo breaks is like living in a horror movie, like being a child scared of the dark or in a body of water with sharks circling. Spooky but thrilling... 10/10 will fuck up your life while they're around unless they get better (which i've witnessed twice, like 180 turn around... at least afaik.
>>
File: 1743433584046492.png (161 KB, 284x283)
161 KB
161 KB PNG
>>82673960
Angry? I'm just shocked really
Anyway do you know me, or something? I have a feeling you may have targeted this thread for a reason
>>
>>82673952
>So it actually is one of those psychology freaks who thinks everyone on the internet is a narcissist
You probably don't understand that Narcissus appeared in a variety of ancient Greek legends numbering in up to hundreds. These were at the time spoken-word stories much like most traditional European tales. In essence through the majority of the tales Narcissus is self-obsessed (auto = self, ismos = state) in addition to ignoring outside influences. One such famous tale is Narcissus and Echo. The tale is often interpreted as being one where Narcissus is obsessed with his own beauty, but, the reality is different. In fact, Narcissus fears making eye-contact with Echo because in so doing she would also see his face and his own insecurity and fear would be revealed to her.

Common interpretations tend to be very shallow and overlook the true meaning of the story while failing to understand the very simple emotions involved.
>>
File: 1727876191704196.png (3.3 MB, 1585x2248)
3.3 MB
3.3 MB PNG
>>82674004
So what does that have to do with your crashout in my thread (unless you're not the anon I was replying to)
Because really, you'd be reading too much into things to make a diagnosis based off of a few posts in 4chan
>>
File: troller.jpg (18 KB, 300x200)
18 KB
18 KB JPG
>>82673974
>Anyway do you know me, or something? I have a feeling you may have targeted this thread for a reason
That's very paranoid delusional way of thinking. No, as I stated before you could die and nobody would notice your absence. There is nothing distinctive about you whatsoever to set you apart from hundreds of other 4chan posters. I simply interpreted what you said literally. Not per se literally, but, multi-nodal in parallel being very aware of idiomatic interpretations. Rather it's my sense of humor to apply what you might call "double-sarcasm" and take idioms very literally in a serious sense. In reality this is only to hide my own lack of emotion which very humorously for me is often interpreted chaotically and uniformly. For instance I may be called a red tier commie, some vague "psychology" claim as you've made or even female. The truth is you have nothing except what I've offered you. Do you bite?
>>
File: 1734653383438067.png (237 KB, 394x396)
237 KB
237 KB PNG
>>82674065
>Rather it's my sense of humor to apply what you might call "double-sarcasm" and take idioms very literally in a serious sense.
I can see why, I mean look at what happened because of it. I found it funny too
>>
>>82674089
>I can see why, I mean look at what happened because of it. I found it funny too
I feel you're still downplaying the OP and are not the OP yourself. The OP was most obviously afraid to admit they were expressing a blatant example of "sour grapes". Making a post specifically about a subject they claimed was uninteresting to them is not ironic or humorous in that sense at all. It's an obvious symptom of personal insecurity regarding the subject and inability to deal with it directly in a healthy or productive way.
>>
File: 1745347823950011.png (147 KB, 495x351)
147 KB
147 KB PNG
>>82674129
>I feel you're still downplaying the OP and are not the OP yourself.
I'm sorry to do this to you back but that's a pretty paranoid and delusional way of thinking anon
>sour grapes
You can criticize something genuinely and still not secretly want it. Not everything has to be sour grapes all the time bro
>>
>>82674191
>You can criticize something genuinely
Then why did you begin your post with a biased appeal to pathos via vainly masked rhetorical question rather than being genuine?
>>
File: 1745239296085032.png (65 KB, 221x214)
65 KB
65 KB PNG
>>82674206
I mean I did genuinely question why there is such a strong pattern there, it's not entirely rhetorical
>>
File: cliff.jpg (10 KB, 220x251)
10 KB
10 KB JPG
>How come every daddy issues girl type is so boring?
Subjective masked rhetorical used to assert the premise without validity.
>I don't know why but everytime I see one of those e-creatures, they always have just a very boring shitty personality.
Duplicitous assertion based upon the technique "tell the same lie many times to have it taken as truth."
>The ones who are open about wanting to be beat and shit, too.
Another attempted disparaging ad hominem aimed at a hollow generalization.
>It's like they're all boring and trying incredibly hard to fit in.
Some genuineness leaks out. Hard to ascertain whether this is projection or desire. It may be they have failed in reaching out and so therefore this observation of an apparent need for acceptance is exceptionally cutting in context of their personal experiences of rejection.
>Yes, I do mean that because a lot of them try to seem like they're far right or something. Some of them actually do hold those beliefs but it really doesn't make them any more interesting.
More generalizations are vaguely asserted whilst calling into question not the definition but widening the generalization to allow a subjective thin slice to reject arbitrarily from qualification.
>They also tend to act like they're retarded. No, I really mean that, they act like it on purpose. Perhaps to sate their fetish about being a dainty weak retard girl who needs a caregiver or whatever.
Even more ad hominem! The disparaging remarks have no end whilst the poster evades even vaguely touching on any genuine substance whatsoever.
>I'm asking because I've met actually interesting and fun girls, I know they exist for a fact. Some who are legitimately far right as well. Not that this only extends to politics, mind you, it's just a pattern that I saw with them.
Yes but this is the real punchline given the poster has never asked even a single question anywhere in their post.
>>
File: 1753018352705789.png (281 KB, 706x772)
281 KB
281 KB PNG
>>82674300
I guess bro



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.