Why is wanting to become a man who has casual sex with a lot of women seen as such an inadvisable mentality to have? That seems to be the stance of people from all around the beliefs spectrum. Interestingly, you don't seem to be universally condemned, if you are such a man. In many cases it's quite the opposite. It's just this idea of aiming to become that. I find this very strange. Then again, my conception of the actual reality of people's dispositions regarding this subject might be inaccurate.
you'll have many children to unwed mothers giving them a hard life, the kids will be criminals, you won't settle and raise a family
>>82677005I don't think that's the deciding factor. Otherwise why wouldn't being the guy who is already doing that universally condemned? Just the desire to become him.
>>82676979>why is being a slave to women and lust seen as a bad thing?
>>82677791I don't think you understood the question.
>>82677791everyone on this board is a slave to pussy they just dont get any so its even sadder
>>82676979It's a poor strategy that isn't fulfilling. Like many things in life, you have no frame of reference as to why it might be a bad idea until you see it for yourself. As an example, it's easier to just lie and tell people what they want to hear than find someone that naturally resonates with you. It becomes exhausting to retain conversation and after its over you hate that person and try to move on to the next. I won't shame anyone having that desire though.
>>82677889>It's a poor strategy that isn't fulfilling.How would most people know? Most people haven't done it. Even body counts like 20 are uncommon among men. And yet it's not just such men discouraging other men from such a pursuit.
>>82677005just use protection nigga
>>82676979In the culture of today I'd say it's fine. The only real thing you need to worry about is STDs.
>>82677816>everyone on this board is a slave to pussyso confidently wrong. there are plenty here that have completely given up on women, it's really not that hard
>>82677952I don't think that's the cultural perception. If your female friend came to the knowledge, that you desire to become a guy who fucks a lot of women casually, she would become disgusted with you, even if she herself engages in promiscuous behavior or has done so in the past. Bizarrely, I don't think she would mind if you already are that guy. At least that's what I've observed. It seems strange to me.
>>82677922Most people don't, but they say it anyway because it's good advice for reasons they don't understand. That's the reality of a lot of solid advice instilled in cultural norms, not all of them though. Like the value those things have are only realized once a person breaks them with enough humility to reflect.
>>82677992I think you can only learn some things through experiencing them. If that's what you desire, I don't think arguments from others are going to convince you. Because at the end of the day it comes down to what you feel is the more appealing option. If you feel it's the discouraged route, then I don't think you can become convinced, it's the worse choice through an argument. Your emotional evaluation of the proposition has to change, and I think that can happen only through experience.
>>82677985Who cares what women think lmao. Their actions say otherwise and that's all that matters
I think it's fine, although I do think eventually there will be incurable STDs that take away the glamor of such a lifestyle. Casanovas that fuck many women serially just seem to be shitty people in my experience? Not always, but they seem to be sardonic deprecating braggarts more often than not. That more speaks to the tastes of women though than the nature of sleeping around lots.
>>82677922Normal people have an instinctual repulsion towards guys that serially sleep around and don't really pairbond with one girl, especially people from once were historically monogamous societies. You have to remember the whole era of casual sex even being a possible thing is very recent, in the past you'd have syphilis and your hair fall out, or the deadbeat would abandon the wife to poverty. Emperors and other elites have always been able to fuck around and coomermaxx with concubines, but they were fat bastards who flaunted their wealth and the woman came. The idea of guys sweettalking and seducing women serially instead of settling is to some extent offputting to a lot of people.
>>82678203>Normal people have an instinctual repulsion towards guys that serially sleep around and don't really pairbond with one girlSee, I don't think this perception is universal. I think that certainly such men are condemned in certain circles, but it's not the case in others. They are celebrated in many. While there is something specifically about the desire to become that man, that is almost universally inadvisable. That's the part I don't understand.
>>82678030I agree anon. I understand the way people are though, past a certain threshold people can get dopamine over situations they couldn't even make decisions in. For the most part I ge that shit too, like I do it for other things.
>>82678241>I think that certainly such men are condemned in certain circles, but it's not the case in others. It's very much praised in lower class trashy areas, it's a class distinction anon. There's a reason the ghetto underclass is rife with such behavior, and no better for it. It's r selected behavior.>While there is something specifically about the desire to become that man, that is almost universally inadvisable.Because it's historically been socially harmful and spreads disease, as I said before.
>>82676979They tell you it's bad because they know you're a betabuxx at best and don't want you to disrupt the natural order where only Chad's allowed to have endless flings.
