>tfw no autistic boy to teach me programming
>>82680427Those are history books, OP.
>>82680427start with an actual book that teaches you coding
>>82680522yeah, they're not about programming either, they're about cybersec
>>82680427I would be willing to teach you I study compsci/math and physics and have some experience in data science and software engineering.If it were up to me...fuck books that's not how you learn coding python -> C (most important, compiling memory debugging etc) -> C++ -> machine language (optional)I still have the notes from my old compsci classes...I would be your private tutor for $5/hr (basically free)
>>82680427learn yourself
>>82680427I'm not autistic. But I was good in my undergrad. Like top of my class. But then I entered the much more difficult Master's program, and my skills atrophied. I haven't done proper programming in a while and feel extremely rusty. I should probably read some books on the topic myself.
>>82680427I'm a lightly autistic man and I'll teach you programming as long as you're not going to expect me to be exclusive to you.
>>82681706>>82682158op is a male attention whore friend collector not a cute lonely girl
>>82681275No, start with an ACTUAL book that teaches you programming
>>82682167Is he really a collector if he only wants one?
well that would be theft, so no
>>82682179he says that but he has lots of different discord servers dedicated to orbiting him
OP post steam account and I'll buy you the game Turing Complete which teaches how to build up from basic circuits to a full computer architecture that runs programs.
>>82680427stupid foid you can literally have an AI bf to teach you everything. If you haven't started on that already you wil never get to it now
>>82682187buy it to me
>>82682541Not with that grammar
>>82682945whats wrong with my grammar ? Im not american
>>82682175I'd start with a disassembler it's easier.// add hexdumpif (opt.hexdump && inc > 0) { int line_length = 32; if (opt.absolute_address) { line_length += 7; } if (opt.address) { line_length += 7; } const int required_size = inc * 2 + 2; if (hexdump_buf.capacity() < required_size) { hexdump_buf.resize((required_size + 255) & (~255)); } char *buf = hexdump_buf.data(); for (int i = 0; i < inc; i++) { sprintf(buf + i * 2, "%.2x", mem[i]); } const int result_length = int(std::strlen(result)); if (result_length < line_length) { for (int i = result_length; i < line_length; i++) { result[i] = ' '; } result[line_length] = 0; } strcat(result, "; "); strcat(result, buf);}
Ew that's bad c++ I need to update the fuck out of that shit.
>>82682993>whats wrong with my grammar ? Im not american>Buy it to me.You've mixed up the grammar for English in general.>Verb Preposition Directional ObjectThe correct syntax is>Buy it for me.That would be another form of potentially directional proposition, but, "for" is also used to indicate purpose and connect the verb to the object. So it is not in this case directional except in its connection VERBtoOBJECT whereas "to" is directional but does not express the same innate connection of purpose.>Verb Preposition ObjectIn other words, "for" links the verb and object in the sense of logic whereas "to" would potentiate that link but not apply it directly. So again, "to" is indirectly indicating a potential direction while "for" is directly associative.
It's like>if (*wordptr == enumclassname::purchase)vs>if (action == enumclassname::purchase)wordptr could be nullptr and then you'd be in big trouble mister smartguy!
>>82683107thank you westerner for explaining that weirdass language
A valid example of potentiation would be>Send it to mehowever "send" is not definitive either, we're using entirely references here including the indirect object *me."Buy" is a directive verb indicating a real action like a function call. This necessitates resolving the references which for "to" is impossible in this particular case.>Buy it and send it to me.Now we've resolved the process of action completely by specifying that it is both purchased and transmitted. "Buy it and send it" becomes a single object as a hierarchical verb, "to" the indirect directional proposition and "me" the indirect object.
You could also say>Buy it for and send it to me.although this is rarely seen in English because it seems redundant to state "for" when this is implicit through resolving the verb and process completely with "send it to". The only remaining redundancy is the double "to".
To resolve that redundancy we might use>Buy and send it to me. This still "sounds wrong" however because it appears to be a sentence fragment.
"It" remains a reference like "me". It's valid grammar per se but would only be understood within a context where "it" and "me" are defined. This form will appear often in valid use of English but it should never appear outside a specific context (such as your post being a reply to another.)>Buy and send it to me.This would have been one of the best choices in that particular instance although it's very "thin" or under-specified compared to ...>Could you buy and send it to me as a gift?
>>82680427Yeah I tried attracting you retards for 20 years and nothing. Find a Filip instead. Me and her program together now. Happiest point in my life. Wish I didn't waste my time on foids who had no interest hobbies or skills. I was a fool thinking you would want to try to learn and do things together. No you just end up being a lazy pos who just wants to yap. Learned my fucking lesson.
>>82680427>implying I would teach you my skills and risk losing my job opportunities
>>82683107Based educator of barbarians
>>82683497englishmen are the barbarians stealing shit, in fact the word barbarian comes from my language same with the word based
>>82683522>the word basedBSD
>>82683738i hate discord fags so much holy shit LOOK DID ANYONE NOTICE MY RANDOM ATTENTION WHORING HAHAHAHAH
>>82683497>Based educator of barbariansAn English course would teach it correctly whereas I just ramble by intuition which is likely incorrect. I get the "feeling" correct but my terminology is way off for "Proposition" and such.
>>82683749>i hate discord fagsWannabe.
>>82680427Thanks for the booklist and reminder to filter out your stupid faggot thread.
Why/because I'll tell you why: because I said so.I'll tell you the law.1] join all discord invites2] shitpost obnoxiously3] completely trash the "server"4] get banned5] repeat
>obnoxiouslyObnoxious.
>>82681275I had to learn assembly before I could learn C, my midwit brain doesn't do well with abstractions unless I understand the underlying layer.
>>82683996It helped me as well. Seeing how the bits directly relate to a physical section on a chip is great.
>>82683996Assembly is an abstraction
Why would anyone want to program in 2025?
>>82684675True, but writing code with a hexeditor is kinda rough. Assembly is about as close to bare metal someone can get without level 10 autism.
>>82684725machine code is an abstraction
>>82684732You're an abstraction.
>>82680427>tfw no CHAD to FLEX ON ME about programming and then RAPE MEfixed that for you, foid
>>82681275>C no one uses that
>>82681275I'm really kicking myself that I saw a copy of this at Barnes and Noble years ago and didn't buy it then they never restocked it. I have a digital copy though. It was only $30 too.
>>82683046>hexdump_buf.resize((required_size + 255) & (~255));retard
>>82684746Now you're getting it. It's all abstractions.