Is misogyny a more serious crime than burglary? Should incels be arrested before thieves?
>>82869806Mass rapes and death torture mandated by law against foids.
>>82869806>rich leftoids be like
>>82869806>You now understand why britain is like that
Feminism is more destructive to society than barbarian raids
>>82869806Burglaries usually result in the loss of property, misogyny results in women being abused, so yeah, it is a bigger problem.
>>82869806Articles like that always make me think about how prominent feminist Gloria Steinem was a CIA spook in the 60's to the 90's, pushing feminism away from its anti-Capitalist roots and into gender theory and man-bashing. Feminism could have been based, now it's just a wash of CIA assets trying to distract you from the fact that you're getting fucked regardless of who you vote for because both sides are paid by the same billionaires and (now) trillionaires
the left is insane and they made it a war
>>82869895Feminism has always been materialistic and anti community (separitism)
>>82869880You're looking at it as a man would. A woman would say that burglaries have gender neutral victims (possibly more often men) and the perpetrators are doing it because of socio economic factors. It's not their fault. Sexism is evil with female victims and male demons.
>>82869806Well she certainly wouldn't be in any danger.
>>82869895You are the most retarded gorilla nigger who ever touched this subject, please don't even try to form an opinion about any of this, ever again because you don't know the first thing about it you mass produced soros rat.>muh based OLD feminism wasn't anti-malekill yourself now, with a gun
can't be bothered to read this to see if there's some gimmick, but i'm assuming Suzanne Moore is pretty comfortable based on her previous articles.if The Guardian actually stuck to its roots, they'd care more about the police not giving a shit about burglaries in less-well-off areas. "social issues" are a middle-class luxury.
>>82869938He's dumber than a box of rocks feminism got subverted into liberal feminism which is literally only benefiting men
>>82869806burglaries are individuals problems, misogyny is a societal threat
>>82869972>liberal feminism which is literally only benefiting menHoly shit is this what women actually believe?
>>82869972>which is literally only benefiting men*sexually attractive men I suppose it also includes guys that want to sell things like lipstick. Its patriarchy to fo without makeup.
>>82869984Don't play dumb. We all found out about your conspiracy to take over feminism with troons and make it male supremacists liberalism.
>>82869972are you pretending to be retarded now?
>>82870019Troon rights only benefit troon men (less than 0.5%) of the population.Men don't want that shit either.You are delusional
>>82870019>Women invite the lgb>Eventually accept the t>Surprised it's biting them in the ass nowIntersectionality is patriarchy's fault o algo
>>82870039Stop gaslighting. And men commit 100 percent of rapes
>>82869972It's primarily benefiting big corpos who get to virtue signal while selling stuff and also get government grants, lower taxes etc. for hiring women (it's same with lgbthdtv stuff).It doesn't really benefit man (i.e. Chads) any more than in the past. They are about in the same position, it's just relatively better for them because all other guys lost.
>>82869984Uh, yes? It literally centers men and somehow every conclusion in it is "give your body away for free so men can have boners and center them in every discussion"
>>82869938Bait successfully taken. All I'm reading here is:>I'm mad, I'm upset, I'm angry because I hate women, I'm furious, I'm frustrated, I'm perturbed
>>82870063>it literally centers menLmaooo
>>82869806If you're rich enough to not worry about burglars, sure.All of this stupid rhetoric is basically status signalling.
>>82870114Not having to worry about burglarly is more of a demographics and city vs country thing. It was insane to move from a 99% white area where nobody locked their doors to the city where people will jiggle your car handle to steal the quarters out of your center console
>>82869972radical feminism actually had some reasonable stuff to say about men back in the day. gender roles harm men - they reduce maleness to some utility like work, best off as soldiers or drones, they have to be unemotional and disposable. and i totally agree.but when they pivot into 'let's all be lesbians' or 'put men in cages' that's just very silly and goes against most women's own interests.gender equality was fine, we hit that point decades ago. great stuff.
>>82870162>radical feminism actually had some reasonable stuff to say about men back in the day.Why did so many of their key and founding authors endorse incest, pedophilia, and bestiality unprompted?
>>82870162Radical feminism isn't for "equality" or men's rights it's for women's liberation you fucking idiot
>>82869806>Is misogyny a more serious crime than burglary? Should incels be arrested before thieves?To (Chad-only) foids, absolutely.
>>82870177fuck knows. i remember Germaine Greer being 'the' feminist and she was unhinged even before all this trans nonsense really took off. i think even enforcing 'cut men/maleness out of your life!' was pretty ridiculous. women-only spaces? yeah sure, go for it, that'll happen organically anyway.>>82870179that's what i'm saying anon. they've pivoted in some weird direction away from equality. i don't even know if they want 'more' it's more like they want to be 'exclusive', but in a way i doubt most (sensible) women even want. a female-only nation would be pretty miserable.
>>82870086Not a single person who gets into the "subverted feminism" argument is baiting. They might be insincere, retarded, but they mean what they say and subscribe to that ideology. So no, you weren't baiting anyone, you just have low IQ and you're a liar.
>>82870280Germaine Greer and Op's woman actually had fights with eachother. Basically feminists immediately being catty and calling eachother ugly lmao
>>82870280Honestly, there isn't really such a thing as 'modern feminism' as a coherent ideology. It's all just whatever some random posts and gets most attention on Instagram or TikTok on a given day.
>>82870305yeah it really does feel like some hashtag/corporate nonsense, more like a fashion than anything meaningful.even when i've known women who are into it, it's hard to figure out what they actually WANT besides 'saying <trendy thing>'.i know you can care about multiple issues, but if you want to DO something about genuine women's issues, go work at a rape shelter or some shit. most women i've known who do that are grown-up about it, and way more thick-skinned than i could ever be.
