>>82874609
>substack
Yea, not reading your cope blog

>>82874609
>if you have life problems despite being high-IQ, you're a weird freak.
Yes this is the board for the mentally ill if you haven't yet noticed.

>>82874609
Self regulation I can see but positive feelings and extraversion seem false both in my own experience and in my observation of others.

>>82874609
I'm mid 100 iq and I feel like I am genuinely hovering at 80 iq
It's brutal
80iq gotta be like fucking 60 aka mental retardation

>>82874609
>Studies assessing the relation of IQ to mating success in America have found that both adolescent men and women have higher rates of virginity when they have high IQ.
>For instance, a study conducted by Halpern et al. (2000) that used a total sample of N = 11,696 adolescents from two longitudinal surveys of adolescent health and sexual behavior, measured the IQs of participants using a simple and equivalent measure of IQ --The Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised (PPVT-R)--which has a correlation of .64 with the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, indicating that the test is a good measure of "g," i.e general intelligence.
>Combining this measure with reports of sexual activity, sexual maturation, and mother's level of education, a statistical analysis of the data revealed that the most sexually successful individuals seem to be those with an IQ of 70-110. This IQ range consists of the borderline mentally impaired at the lower end (70, an IQ below this threshold is generally considered to constitute an intellectual disability) to somewhat above average (110) at the higher end.
>The peak was at the 75-90 IQ range for males, with these males the least likely to be virgins as adolescents.
>At the low end of the spectrum, an interesting trend emerges, as we see that low IQs affect male and female sexual activity differently. 46.7% of low IQ men were sexually active, while only 18.4% of low IQ women were. Thus low IQ men were 2.5x as likely as low IQ women to be sexually successful.