Reminder to recognize and reject your internalized gynocentrism
Only interested in coombait and ragebait, huh.
>>82876124>he says as he larps as a male feminist to trollKekaroo
>>82876153>he says as he larps as a male feminist to trollThat isn't the case at all, though, lack of reading comprehension anon.
how? i want to be loved by a woman.
>>82876523relinquishing your standards for a parasite that won't relinquish their standards is not love. it's self-disposability.
>>82876709well, i didn't say i'm dropping my standards out of desperation. i said i want to be loved by a woman, and what i meant is that that desire for love and companionship makes women and their thoughts, feelings and behaviours all take up an unwarranted amount of space in my thoughts, where they're afforded an unwarranted amount of esteem. i care too much, because i want love. how would one go about rejecting that gynocentrism?
>>82876747Like everything else, the desire for companionship is a manifestation/symbol of a yearning for something higher (think source or divinity). One could experience a fraction of that power with a woman, assuming they are pure of heart. But since women aren't what they say they are, it's easily concludable that women are actually a false-light in reality. To put too much emphasis on this symbol is to fall for a trap into eternal darkness because you have strayed away from higher-being.The practice of seeing through desire is a good first step (i'm sure you know where this is going). From this you could learn to willfully manipulate/transform your desires since they don't actually define your true self. Or maybe you could give Goddess worship a try and see where it takes you? (Tho ideally it should be The Father :p )If not these then internalize the truth that all forms of wonder can and will be found with in, not the external. Because the external world and its games are just a means to an end and is often filled with false hierarchies like "gynocentrism".
but I really do love women, anon :(
It's pervading but it shall be eradicated
>>82875512Fully rejected already, even the idea of rape seems a little silly now because it's just a lot of effort and risk only to give women exactly what they want.
>>82876899i agree that faith in God would be likely to free me from vain desires, and that most of what i want has roots in either misplaced faith or lack of faith. in fact, i believe faith/belief is at the root of our entire worldview and most of our psychology. however, i don't know that i can believe. though you seem like you might be talking about something else, i did spend months praying regularly in the hopes it would bring me closer to religion, but it did the opposite. whenever i consider aligning myself with, say, catholicism, there always appears some point that i am unable to accept their stance on. i know the point is that individual personal opinions are arbitrary and ill-grounded, and that you therefore should submit to the will and law of a greater authority, and mine certainly are, but it is feeling that's keeping me from religion, and feeling alienated from a foreign religion's tenets makes it difficult to even consider adopting it. i could, of course, attempt to build my own private heresy, but to build a coherent system like that is an enormous undertaking effectively reserved for schizos and geniuses, and if i ever realized i was wrong in something i would immediately lose all faith in the whole thing.i guess maybe this wasn't what you meant. i guess the point is that i'm stuck on what i'm really feeling, and not on reason. reasoning about things doesn't seem like it can take me anywhere. i already see that my feelings are groundless. but still, they're there, and i act according to them in absence of something more convincing. reason's good for criticizing and tearing down your mental constructs, but i think i'm more or less done with that, and now i'm left with the haphazard scraps i need to maintain to be able to live my life (in a basic sense), and i can't seem to find a solid foundation to build anything more on.i have no true self, more real than what i present, as far as i can tellwhat are you talking about?
>>82875512Very important message. I'm proud of you for amplifying it, anon.
