[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/r9k/ - ROBOT9001


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1761054418731643.png (1.29 MB, 1536x1536)
1.29 MB
1.29 MB PNG
It was so great. Also the other sites that had them.
Felt bad for the poor lil babies, but it also satisfied this cuteness aggression itch you feel me?
Wish they came back, it's a pity that every place got raided and shut down.
>>
>>82876026
If you're serious, seek help
>>
>>82876026
Didn't the US make a court ruling to treat those videos as basically CSAM? Those videos aren't coming back, you degenerate.
>>
>>82876050
They're treated as animal crush porn, so they're illegal but the sentences tend to be light. I've heard a theory that the people who enjoy them are deeply closeted sadist pedophiles and I believe it. The comments these retards will leave on those kinds of videos, on their public facebook pages, are heinous.
>>
>>82876050
Yeah I think so, the whole circus was pretty entertaining. Some of the torturers got arrested, experiencing it live was wild. I think they might come back, and it wouldn't be surprising if the telegrams are still very active, but I have no desire to risk my life that much. AI models and fantasy will provide the scratch soon enough...

>>82876040
Help for what?
>>
>>82876063
>I've heard a theory that the people who enjoy them are deeply closeted sadist pedophiles and I believe it.
I used to say this was stupid, but as of now I kinda feel like there is something to it. Not necessarily that the people who enjoy it are sadists or pedophiles completely - more like they have some tendencies? I don't get the wild statement of pedophilia at all, but sadism for sure since it's literal torture.
>>
>>82876064
>Some of the torturers got arrested, experiencing it live was wild. I think they might come back, and it wouldn't be surprising if the telegrams are still very active, but I have no desire to risk my life that much. AI models and fantasy will provide the scratch soon enough...

I WAS THERE FOR THE MONKEY THREADS... I missed everything, I didn't even know they were outlawed were there thread discussions about it?

>Felt bad for the poor lil babies, but it also satisfied this cuteness aggression itch you feel me?
I don't know what I felt, I was just fascinated in what was going on, what abuse and torture looked like. People said they were the rats of whatever shit country they were in, so I just pictured them as rats and I've tortured a couple unfortunate pests in my life (never to that extreme)
>>
>>82876077
He suggested that baby monkeys, being not human but very close to humans, are stand-ins for what they want to do to real babies, and that they justify it because "it's just an animal". I believe it, and part of that is the things they say about the monkeys. The thing that stands out most in my memory (there's a KF thread on them with a ton of chat screenshots) is that they will attribute human motivations to the monkeys. "It's fake crying because it wants attention" "It's not really in pain, it's just being annoying". Many also have a weird fixation on the penises of baby male monkeys. (Unrelated but strange: a lot of them are either 30-somethings with young kids or 50+ years old)
>>
>>82876107
>were there thread discussions about it
Yeah on /gif/ and sometimes /pol/ and there was this russian image board with one obscure board solely dedicated to monkey torture, it was just endless content of monkey torture and seething activitists sending bbc or tranny porn lol. Ahh I miss those times so much.

>>82876121
Why do you believe it? I watched tons of that shit and my sister had a baby. Held her in my arms, took care of her. I am a detached person, but like her a lot and hope she will live a wonderful life. Maybe you are right about some of those viewers, but it's kinda stupid to attribute a fantasy to every single one, on really no basis. You would never assume I watched that shit if you saw me irl.
>>
>>82876121
It's probably childhood abuse projection.
Now be a good fluffy or you get the sorry stick.
>>
>>82876050
>Didn't the US make a court ruling to treat those videos as basically CSAM
source because holy shit.
does this mean they'll be on a sex offender registry or something
>>
>>82876143
>no basis
Did you miss the part where I talked explicitly about the comments they make? If they're making comments projecting human attributes onto the animals being tortured, and also making sexual comments, then I think it's a pretty safe bet they're fantasizing about sexually torturing children.
>>82876144
Nah it's because it's easier for the third worlders they pay to make the videos to get their hands on monkeys than kids. I know what these people are.
>>
>>82876164
>about the comments they make
People can say all kinds of shit. I can start saying wild shit on here as well, doesn't reflect what I am like in person. Humans are more complex than that, but u do u.
>>
>>82876077
Well sometimes it's to be edgy. I know when I was young on here I used to think I was the edgiest boy on the internet. Now I sigh in relief when something in a gore thread gets to me, it's good to see the internet hasn't taken all of my soul
>>
>>82876178
So your proposal is that
>boomers are going on Facebook and watching videos of monkeys being tortured, often in sexual ways
>these boomers, after watching these videos of sexual sadism, are then making comments to be edgy, but in exactly the way that makes sense psychologically if they were just pedophile sadists
What a sensible theory compared to my much more complex one that the people watching baby animals being raped and tortured, and then talking about how great the raping and torturing of baby animals is, are probably into raping and torturing baby animals (humans are an animal too in case you forgot)
>>
>>82876164
Well, I don't know. Maybe that's just true for me. I hated seeing real animals get tortured but fluffies were an acceptable replacement.

I don't know about all the pedo crap, because I don't know these communities, but I know that the most satisfying fluffy comics were where fluffy smarties would display the worst traits of "humanity" and get punished for it, and the "good" fluffies would be rewarded and treated nicely. I never liked the unjust abuse comics because I subconsciously placed myself in the shoes of that fluffy and empathized, I imagine the people making those very comics are dealing with trauma in the only way they can - artistic expression, even though it's fucked up.
>>
>>82876189
>Now I sigh in relief when something in a gore thread gets to me
Point me towards it please, what did you see, all I feel is a great emptiness and boredom. I should leave all these imageboards behind once and for all desu. All it did was expand my view of what is all out there, at the cost of experiencing life.
>>
>>82876196
You remind me of a person who is deeply invested in drama that is years gone and has completely absorbed the dogma generated by a few youtube videos dedicated to this kinda stuff. Let's end this at we both have our opinions and they. are. valid. mkay



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.