If you think girls being easy is a moral failing you're probably brainwashed or coping
>>82883545Everyone should have higher standards for themselves than they currently do
>>82883545A woman being easy means that other men had her, pretty simple logic>other men having her isn't badCuck
>>82883545girls are easy to the same 3-5% of men, and impossibly difficult with the rest of us. either be easy with anyone, or difficult with everyone
>>82883545If they're only easy for chad, it's a moral failing.If they're easy in general, it's cool and good and they should be celebrated.
>>82883545I dont think a woman playing (a little) hard to get isn't so bad. But she has to give some hint that she likes you.If shes playing REAAALLLY hard to get then shes not playing hard to get. She doesnt want you.Also that girl has the hips of a god. I wish my hips were like that
>>82883545I lost count of how many foids wanted to have sex with me, since middle school that was a problem. I'm still a virgin. I prefer to die waiting for the perfect virgin girl than to fuck some used trashWomen being easy is automatically disgusting
>>82883573That doesn't actually follow from that but okay. Also you need to see it from the girls perspective having sex and fulfilling her desires feels good. >>82883579That is true but then blame yourself for being a wimp instead of them for having sex with better men. Because most guys are bums, zero ambition, not taking care out their appearance/hygiene x doing whatever time wasting hobbies like porn, anime or games>>82883588I appreciate the straightforward selfish reasoning and I can get where you're coming from unlike the sex = bad crowd>>82883592Your hips? Aren't you a dude? I am into wide hips too just not like that. >>82883644You're obsessed with other dudes
>>82883545it depends what "easy" means. >1 if it means promiscuity, then yes. It's morally wrong. >2if it means that, she likes a man, and expresses such desire by approaching him or being receptive to his approach, without all the bullshit; then no, it's not morally wrong. As long as she is loyal, of course.
>>82883791>Also you need to see it from the girls perspective having sex and fulfilling her desires feels goodI do not care about her perspective. She shall obey and be mine only
>>82883851>1 Why do you think it's bad for girls to get their physical needs met?>>82883871Well that's sorta based at least, I still disagree though
A pack of blacks could smash OP's girl and the smelly little cuckold would think it's a good thing because she got her needs met.Women being used goods in an all-white society would be bad. Women being used goods in a society full of blacks and browns is fucking catastrophic.
>>82883871>She shall obey and be mine onlySome foid probably is fingering herself to that
>>82883911>Why do you think it's bad for girls to get their physical needs met?Needs? I thought that was the incel argument. That sex is a necessary and normies constantly shit on them for that view
>>82883791>Your hips? Aren't you a dude? No buddy. Foid here
>>82883936That sounds like rape so I wouldn't be okay with that. >>82883967Yes? I am an incel, I take a blackpilled view on sex and females. I just disagree with some of the common prescriptive arguments.>>82883991What da...
>>82883545looks dwarf, pass
>>82883545I don't care if she's easy as long as she's not promiscuous.
>>82884407No she doesn't but it does suck how many stacked females are also short.>>82884451Nothing wrong with promiscuity either it's just females expressing their nature
sex feels good, no shit. The double standard is retarded, it takes 2 to tango
>>82886093>The double standard is retardedI don't care what men do because I'm not attracted to them. I care about what women do because one of them will be my wife Where's the double standard?
>>82883545If you're not brainwashed and coping you're brainwashed or coping
>>82886093There is no double standard, no one would get mad at women for wanting a virgin. You're literally the thing you're complaining about.
>>82883545Total Slut death.Total Whore death.
>>82883791>>82883545Who is this brood mare?
>>82886568At end both settle down with a cuck that accepts used rags
>>82884083as a man i relate more to women who want to be desired for their physical features
>>82883545If it produces a more peaceful and productive society for women to be chaste then that's the morally superior option. If it doesn't than it isn't. It's really that simple. No need to bring good and evil into it.
>>82886674Not using drugs makes for a better society yet there's millions of people that use drugs. Just because something is morally superior doesn't mean people will practice it
>>82886674we could have a more peaceful and productive society if we killed all criminals, but we don't do that because it's evil. there are other concerns than gdp
>>82886701Sure but the question was if it was a moral failing not whether or not people will do it (if not enforced adequately)>>82886721>because it's evilThat's a subjective claim. I don't think that's evil in general, it depends on the crime. Even then "evil" isn't a useful way to think about this. If killing criminals of a certain degree causes more social unrest than the killings prevent then I'd consider it immoral.
>>82886754>If killing criminals of a certain degree causes more social unrest than the killings prevent then I'd consider it immoral.why privilege social cohesion as the moral end which determines whether something is immoral? that's as arbitrary as individual wellbeing, or justice. Really most people have a view of right and wrong that fuzzily considers multiple ends. the idea of killing all criminals is abhorred by most because it is unjust and causes greater harm to the criminal than most of them would inflict on society unpunished.Even if society were more peaceful and productive if women were universally shamed for being sluts, the wellbeing of those women would be diminished. maybe one consideration is worth more than another, but it's not a foregone conclusion which consideration is more important.
>>82883644100% a lie nice fantasy though
>>82886831>why privilege social cohesion as the moral end which determines whether something is immoral?It's not the sole thing, but it's one of the obvious components. I would say that the full moral end isn't any single objective value but a complex mix of objectives which, in seeking to maximize these objectives, one society will tend to out-compete any other alternative for the given environment. That's my best description if we're trying to have some sort of scientific integrity here.>Really most people have a view of right and wrong that fuzzily considers multiple ends. the idea of killing all criminals is abhorred by most because it is unjust and causes greater harm to the criminal than most of them would inflict on society unpunished.Yeah that's what I was saying too. When we attempt to establish norms that cause unreasonable punishment you get push-back because people are (at least subconsciously) aware that these kinds of policies can inevitably lead to oppressive systems. I think it's fine to use the peoples aggregate authentic reaction to an incident presented honestly and in full context as an approximate barometer for our current morality.>Even if society were more peaceful and productive if women were universally shamed for being sluts, the wellbeing of those women would be diminished. maybe one consideration is worth more than another, but it's not a foregone conclusion which consideration is more important.Well that depends on how they would end up feeling in that alternate society. Sure we could be shaming the sluts of today and somehow convincing them to be chaste. That's one way of trying to get there. Or maybe there's another way where they (or a future generation) are persuaded amicably and end up happier living that way.
>>82883791Majority of people have sex a lot. And those that go to the chads? Well maybe it's better to go to a chad then to someone who is dirty, low standard, and creeps. Just saying.
>>82886959also I should probably mention that I personally like sluts. I'm just entertaining this argument philosophically because it's fun.
>>82883545I generally find slobbering low inhib goyim disgusting
>>82887063What are you doing on r9k then, goy?
>>82886959>>82887056me too, i like sluts too, i think it's possible that slutty women make everyone's wellbeing higher than chaste women and cause the society to win over everyone else in the world
>>82883545I think the bigger cope is pretending not to care about how many partners your partner has previosly bonded with. Its an understandable cope of course we can't get everything
>>82883545>If you think girls being easy is a moral failing They're easy?
>>82883545Nah, I've been with and rejected easy women. Instinctively it doesn't feel right so I don't go for those kind of women anymore
>>82883791>are bums, zero ambitionMen are not providers though, they're humans like you.
>>82883545>>82883791>>82883911>>82884083>>82885944Reminder to all the coomers that those are all AI pictures
