>>82888039
you should prove it by killing yourself

Ideally I'd be pro life since I don't find the pro choice "clump of cells" or "bodily autonomy" arguments at all convincing. However since I'm not religious, even if it is probably murder, sometimes murder is okay if it prevents future suffering (assisted suicide, death penalty, etcetera). So if a woman isn't going to take care of a kid, or the kid'll be born with physical or mental disibilities, I'm not really against abortion. Not to mention how the only viable party that advocates against abortion access is also one that wishes to cut funding to contraceptives, sexual education, maternal leave, and so one.

I'm a conditional antinatalist because very few people live correctly and are capable of having a positive effect on their children's lives

>>82888039
No one should be pro-life. If you truly love children, you should not subject them to a mother who doesn't want them. Mothers seeking abortions aren't exactly parents of the years, and the child will have a shit life growing up if not an outright abusive one.
In the end, abortion would be the merciful choice.