Is it evil to do evil against evil people? I was thinking about the sulfur god from fear and hunger and it makes more and more sense to me to retaliate evil with even more evil. It is the only way to deal with this kind of behavior. Being good and nice is a cope for people who are good looking and sucesfull to feel better about themselves, nobody cares about this. If you are ugly, lonely and socially awkward nobody will ever give a fuck if you are nice. So in the word of machelive it is better to be feared than loved if you can't have both. don't see anything wrong with inflicting suffering on the people who made me suffer, like people who sleep around and have gfs while I never even touched a woman in my entire life.>inb4 but it is not their fault women don't want youIt is.
At first you're talking about bashing evil with evil, then you switch to being full sulfer. If anything, it is the existance of simp men that is the cause of male problems.
>>82894518But simp men are just the natural consequence of the biological state we live in that we have way more men than women until the age of 60 and the social state that some men get to be with multiple women making things even worse. Simps should suffer but they are just the cause and not the root of the problem.
>>82894338Evil fights evil so good people don't have to.
>>82894543But it is boomer men who fucked up economy, housing, job market. Today's ethnic problems (being opressed for being white), political problems (stealing from good, hard working man to translocate the founds to a lazy fat fuck single mom) are caused by the generation of weak men. They did everything to live a comfortable life at the extend of next generations.
>>82894638That is not how it should be.>>82894704Boomers are not simps far from it. They are part of the evil I was talking about.
>>82894338it depends, really... depends how you apply it and who it spills ontoevil vs evil may just create an endless cycle, after you're through with the evildoer, you become the next onesee i'm all up for fair treatment, i believe it's right to be kind to kind people, be respectful of anyone as a baseline, and to punish the wicked by whatever means necessarybut punishing them isn't always the same as "doing evil" to themlike for instance a murderer or child molester, something evil you can do is kill their loved ones right in front of them, but is that the right course of action? your actions are affecting others who have nothing to do with it, you'd be spilling innocent blood, and you'd be doing evil but the cost is far too greattl;dr punishing the wicked is the right thing to do, but if at all possible, it must not create more evil in the world, as you must be the lesser evil in that case
>>82894841Yes it is they have to suffer the same way you did, karmic debt has to be paid for the suffering to end. It is not enough to punish the wrongdoer but also the people who supported him, for whoever nourishes evil is also evil. Just because you don't know you are doing evil does not excuse for your actions. Boomers for example think they are honest and just people.
>>82895300>they have to suffer the same way you didwe all perceive suffering differently, so that idea goes out the windowthey have to suffer in kind, but again, only when it doesn't make you the greater evil in the storyalways fight the greater evil>not enough to punish the wrongdoer but also the people who supported himi partially agree with thisif they knowingly support the wicked, then they're just as guilty, but if they're deceived or otherwise support them without realizing they're evil, then these are simply victims as well>Just because you don't know you are doing evil does not excuse for your actions.assume incompetence rather than malicethe wicked are malicious, the incompetent are notpunishment are for the wicked, the incompetent need education and guidance, not punishment>Boomers for example think they are honest and just people.if you mean to imply every boomer is an evil piece of shit, you're blindtelling the innocent from the wicked is the most important thing, because the moment you spill innocent blood is the moment you become evil yourself, and the more blood you spill, the greater the evil you becomeif you're as dedicated to eradicating evil as you seem, you'd have to eradicate yourself sooner or later
>>82894338Let them eat each other and stay out of the mess. Before you know it you'll be the only one making out like a bandit in the long term. Stay good and kind, you kill them with that. Feeding into evil with more evil will just mark you with the same stains, shortcomings and karmic retributions. Carve your own path divorced from the wicked.
>>82894338>Is it evil to do evil against evil people?There is no absolute "evil" - its all relative and in comparison to your own morals and ideals. So I guess, yeah it is evil to do evil. >Being good and nice is a cope for people who are good looking and sucesfull to feel better about themselvesThere is also no absolute "good", so trying to be "good" is like patting yourself on the back, or seeking other with the same ideals so that you can all jerk each other off. >So in the word of machelive it is better to be feared than loved if you can't have bothif you tend to your own, and try not being "evil" (not to be confused with trying to be "good"), then you still have a chance with women - sounds much better than the edgelord alternative you're suggesting.
>>82894338There are no "Evil" people. I mean this wholeheartedly. People aren't evil. They are just misguided. Some are misguided to such an extent that it's preferable to put them down rather than heal them. Such is life.
>>82894338You're on the right track, but the cause of all the suffering most men experience today is caused by simps. Get rid of the simps, then the women return to being property once more.
>>82894338Not reading all that. You should kill yourself for being such a loser.
>>82894338>Is it evil to do evil against evil people?Generally speaking yes.
>>82894338https://youtu.be/1PG1OXq6zUAYour mistake is thinking you can teach anyone anything. Even faced with her death, this woman continued to be belligerent. The cool thing about evil is that it auto damages the user. You genuinely don't have to do anything to correct it. Life will do that on it's own naturally. Evil people are never happy and actively make the people around them miserable. The thing is, the people around them are more than willing to return the favor. No one suffers more than these people. Whatever dopamine hit they get from flexing power over some naive person is almost immediately extinguished by some triviality. You're better served bettering yourself than acting as some kind of suicide missile at an evil person. But bettering yourself is harder than acting on destructive impulses isn't it? Maybe you aren't as good as you think you are. Maybe you should create something.
