[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/r9k/ - ROBOT9001


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1617204635107.jpg (642 KB, 820x981)
642 KB
642 KB JPG
What do you guys think of hebephilia (when someone's main attraction is girls who've started but not yet finished puberty)?
I think I am one. I find girls and women of all ages attractive, as long as they're not babies or grandmas. But I'd say my primary attraction is towards hebes. I don't know why.
>>
>>82910986
The Trump administration is putting forth legislation to lower the age of consent to 14 years old so that everyone involved in the epstein case will retroactively be found not guilty.

So it seems to me that conservatives are leading the way to normalizing it.
>>
>>82910986
I think you should stay the fuck away from schools, and better yet, dont go out of your house so you cant harm any poor little kid
>>
File: aerhaerh66754.jpg (119 KB, 750x1000)
119 KB
119 KB JPG
>>82910986
They are the perfect lolis. So many people just hate beauty and cuteness it's disgusting. I am not the bad guy I also don't go to schools to brainwash children to be gay or lurk around or interact with them.
>>
KYs nigger pedo.
>>
I don't really care as long as the person in question isn't actually hurting irl children.

Thoughts and fantasies are fine.
Actions that harm others are not.

To me it's that simple.
>>
File: deeply pondering.jpg (192 KB, 1200x900)
192 KB
192 KB JPG
I think it's normal and healthy
>>
>>82911062
I wish more anons were like you. Why do so many people want to kill me for it? These karen thought policing control freaks belong in the chains not me. What evil has been slain? Who was protected from the evil? The pixels? The young girl I decided not to hurt? These people do not have rational thoughts or feelings.
>>
I think you should keep quiet about that dude
>>
File: 1758052810170.jpg (513 KB, 1079x1500)
513 KB
513 KB JPG
>>82911019
Take ur meds
>>82911062
Define "hurt"
Regardless, I'm a virgin. Not exactly the most attractive guy around lol
>>82911109
Well I talk about it with my best friend, he makes fun of me for it
>>
>>82911106
Because youre a pedophile. Its not about if youve hurt a kid or not (if youve hurt any, then its worse) is just that you are disgusting.

For me, pedophiles are like if a greasy and sticky old man that hasnt showered in 5 years approached me
>but its not hurting you
It still is disgusting
>>
>>82911152
> disgusting
Only in their heads do they think they can rationalize this with pure malice and hatred for people that do not commit an evil act. I did not act upon any urge but on my brain sees loli and it goes "beautiful admirable also want to fuck" but no no no the thought entered now I HAVE to die for it. It is not rational it is delusional evil masquerading as justice and want for chaos and pain.
>>
File: 1760707060954189.gif (2.56 MB, 1229x1218)
2.56 MB
2.56 MB GIF
>>82911152
>Its not about if youve hurt a kid or not
You are a legit evil person, you are just a sadistic narcissist, be better.
>>
>>82911152
>>82911178
A fair comparison will always be enjoying violent videogames and I'm tired of them pretending not to understand this. They simply keep searching for a target to direct their own self entitled hatred on and it's people like me who are pretty chill and reasonable.
>>
>>82911130
>Define "hurt"
In this context, if I was to be as specific as reasonable possible.

To cause empirically verifiable harm.
To have a provable negative effect.

I should not have to elaborate a ton more, my position should be pretty clear, at least I hope it's clear.
>>
>>82911178
Yeah pretty much that. If you find a children's body desirable theres something deeply wrong with you, and i know for a fact that youre not going to try and fix it
>>
>>82911200
>theres something deeply wrong with you
And I'm willing to accept that if it objectively true. What still matters and matters much more is just the actions you or I decide to make.
>>
Normies need to take a long look and the mirror and start thinking.

>hmm maybe it's bad and not healthy for me to want to kill people for peoples internal thoughts they keep to themselves.
>>
File: 1753383621600.jpg (2.6 MB, 3657x4800)
2.6 MB
2.6 MB JPG
>>82911199
I'm not interested in rape if that's what you're wondering
>>82911200
Not that guy but yes, finding children's bodies attractive is abnormal (though I'd say not as rare as you'd think).
Now finding hebes attractive is pretty common actually. This doesn't mean they are the primary attraction (most men are not hebephiles) but there will always be some degree of attraction towards girls with developing bodies. Most guys would not admit it (I'd say most even lie to themselves) because society says finding 12 year olds attractive is the worst thing in the world. But biologically, it makes sense for it to be there. Girls with pubes and swelling titties will always ellicit some kind of reaction from healthy males.
In our society even ephebophilia (which is just normal male sexuality, not even a paraphilia at all) is shunned. If you say you find 16-17 year olds attractive many people will treat you like a creep, even though they are developed and the biggest differences between a 16 year old and a 26 year old are wrinkles and cellulite.
>>
File: images (13).jpg (44 KB, 495x619)
44 KB
44 KB JPG
>>82910986
Why is Lillie the fucking CEO of hebes online?
Also, arent Pokemon girls 10? These are pre pubscent children so pedophilia instead of hebephilia.
>>
>>82911266
I believe she is supposed to be 11
And girls start puberty at 10-11
>>
>>82911261
>I'm not interested in rape if that's what you're wondering
I wasn't.
I just wanted to be clear that II was talking about "actual" harm and not wishy washy justifications for thought crimes.
For example saying causing unpleasant thoughts and feelings, or even the possibility of causing unpleasant thought or feelings is justification to ban things, restrict liberties, and punish people.

Masturbating to cartoons in your room isn't harming anyone so should not be justification to ban those cartoons or punish you for offending some 3rd party who was in no way actually harmed.
Let's keep it at that.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.