>>82926981
What the fuck was that word vomit you just forced me to read?

>>82926981
idk why should we care if women don't choose us we have porn

literally who also who cares

This nigga making up words or just find of a very new edition thesaurus. I bet the ladies can't help but cream themselves when they see what he types.

>>82926981
What is this pseudointellectual word salad garbage I just read. Jesus christ gave me a fucking brain tumour reading to the end of his tweets

File: give us the aryan breedin(...).jpg (178 KB, 756x931)

178 KB JPG

>>82927085
>>82927033
>>82927094
low IQ apes detected
did I give you a headache?

Both of those posters are retards in that they're oversimplifying a complicated situation. The truth is we do not know why birth rates are declining because we've never faced this sort of situation historically. We can't draw connections between past events and current conditions because the conditions humanity exists under today have never occurred in the past. This means it is impossible to predict the future, which is literally terrific for some people.

The reality is there are so many factors at play and those we know and understand are a small faction of the total factors. Even the widespread use of plastics in modern society are having a detrimental effect on reproduction.

The best summary I can come up with, despite it being impossible to summarize accurately is that the largest KNOWN FACTORS are overexposure to entertainment, increasing stress, reduced income, difficulty making a living and obtaining a home, reductions in health and therefore the natural instinctual response is to avoid reproduction.

Some of the factors we know which lead to increased reproduction are lower education, low access to entertainment, high availability of resources such as food, low cost of living, ease in establishing a living and owning a secure home and social and economic class mobility.

I'd guess what I've just described is less than ten percent of the whole.

We know Japan famously entered into a constant recession during the late 1970s and 1980s and faced similar declines in birth rate at the same time. We can draw connections between the economic, social and entertainment situation in Japan in the 1980s with the western world in since 2008 connected to the United States "Great Recession". This have been downhill since then with steeply declining quality of manufactured goods and food supplies along with out of control inflation.

The similarities to the situation in Japan in the 1980s are extreme. Despite that, there are enough unique cultural differences that direct analogies and connections can not be made.

I can tell you why I chose never to have a child:
I wouldn't intentionally torture someone like that. The day I see my own future being better than my present is the day I'll potentially opt to have a child.

>>82927369
"Omnipervasive pluriexponence" isn't even a real phrase. If this isn't bait, please kill yourself you absolute pseud baboon

Why do taxes, workers rights, regulations and minimum wage exist in our economy? The reason is because if businesses are allowed to set these parameters themselves they are naturally less productive. These are "optimization" features which force a business which is incapable of paying its employees or paying taxes on profit to reinvest in the foundation of society which supports them. If a business is incapable of surviving under these conditions, it is not allowed to exist and will go bankrupt. This prevents hazardous businesses from occupying markets and leading to detriments to overall economic productivity.

Sales taxes lead to dead weight losses which similarly reduce overall economic productivity. The sole situation in which such taxes may be justified is a so-called "sin tax" such as taxes applied to liquor or cigarettes. The net benefit of such taxes are greater due to the fact they reduce productivity of the economy and reduce consumption of these hazardous substances. Without such "sin taxes" there is a net harm to overall economic productivity.

Understanding how these complex systems work together to produce a dynamically optimizing system is far beyond the IQ of all but 1/40 persons.

>>82926981
While his vocabulary is technically "impressive", there's a reason they say an idiot worships complexity while a genius appreciates simplicity.
All of those "big words" no matter how understandable overall just make him seem like he's trying too hard to sound smart, which immediately turns your opinion of his sentiments to a negative one.
Everything he said could've been shortened into the length of basically one tweet. There's no point to this other than an attempt at increasing the "validity" of your opinion by projecting a "respectable" ethos which in turn completely invalidates it. Oh god, now I sound just like him...
>pluriexponence
Except whatever the fuck this word is. No such word exists.

>>82927473
>u can't kno!!!!!

File: 2023-01-08_14.34.45.png (2.4 MB, 1920x1017)

2.4 MB PNG

>>82927473
>>82927509
thanks chatgpt

>>82926981
the reason is lack of freedom- more bureaucracy
less freedom = less bad things and less good things happening
people living in society abide by order to survive. this doesn't create an environment where people can carve out a path to make and raise children, but rather a pathway to simply continue existing. people can't chop down forests and kill natives for resources anymore. people can't use slave labor to make their town wealthy. the absence of good is also the absence of evil, two outcomes unable to be chosen by modern citizens.

>>82927568
>"Omnipervasive pluriexponence"
Omni- = Latin, "all", "whole", "every", "work", "function"
pervasive = Latin, per, vado, "pass through"
pluri = Latin, plura, "plural", "many"
exponence = Latin, adjective relating to exponentiation, "growth"

>>82927609
>thanks chatgpt
I'm not as retarded as you, so thank you.

>>82927609
>the reason is lack of freedom
You're free to do whatever the fuck you want. Go kill someone. Nobody will stop you unless you make it obvious or fuck up so they know what you're planning. You can do anything. You can kill anyone. There is no law that can prevent you, just as there is no law that keeps anyone safe. The sole thing that prevents you is your own fear.

>>82926981
Thats a lot of word vomit to say "Women arent having children due to feminism."

You can rape, murder and steal anything or anyone. Just remember when you consider suicide, if you are justified in taking your own life so too are you justified in taking another's life.

If you die nobody will notice. Can you take another life which will make them aware? This is exponentiation. You use your life as a lever to kill someone who will be noticed. Your goal is not to do harm nor to be noticed. Your goal is to use them as an object regardless of the consequences.

>>82927625
excuse me but who is giving summaries in the middle of their arguement. i will quote

>The best summary I can come up with, despite it being impossible to summarize accurately is that the largest KNOWN FACTORS are overexposure to entertainment, increasing stress, reduced income, difficulty making a living and obtaining a home, reductions in health and therefore the natural instinctual response is to avoid reproduction.

then you proceed to give several more paragraphs of fluff
why was it necessary to say how difficult it is to summarize
why do you state it is a "known factor" if you aren't planning on citing a source
"reductions in health" is a not explained at all by you neither could anyone interpret what you mean

do you desire further criticism

>>82927615
Yes anon, we all know what those Latin words mean, that's hardly impressive
The point is, you can't just put them together and expect for them to be recognized as real words.
At the very least, they'd need to be separated by a dash.
Whatever that pseudointellectual was intending to communicate with this mish mash of established Latin words is fundamentally grammatically incorrect.
>exponentially all-pervasive (no need to translate pervasive from Latin, thanks to its already established meaning)
Even when restructured to be grammatically correct, it hardly makes sense to use "exponentially" and "omni" or "all" in the same sentence, since the former implies the latter, unless the "growth" is stopped.

>>82927642
>feminism
The low IQ coward typically grasps as the nearest straws in a vain attempt to prevent their drowning. Such a struggle is truly humorous when the fool dies this way wholly in vain where they could have simply floated by relaxing.

>>82927671
>why do you state it is a "known factor" if you aren't planning on citing a source
is it 10% or 1%? What about the other remainder?

This is how we identify the fool. You.

>>82927615
Just because the pieces have etymological meaning doesn't mean the combo means anything coherent. You'd know that if you weren't a retard

>>82927672
SODIUM CHLORIDE.

>>82927639
i know this but i do not live for myself i have retarded autistic brothers who cannot survive by their own means which makes the duty of taking care of them fall to me should my father expire

>>82927697
you are talking about percentages and remainders this is not math class this is a debate try to stay on topic

>>82927704
Yeah, that's basically what the guy in op tweet is doing.
And he's no less incorrect.

>>82927699
>anything coherent.
Coherence, that is reading comprehension depends upon the capabilities of the reader. I understood what he said albeit his grammar and choice of words is garbage. If you're here to complain about the fact you did not understand, you can shit yourself harder.

>>82927717
>And he's no less incorrect.
It's irrelevant, he's simply grasping at straws for the nearest tell. This tell is that he's single and has no sex.

SURPRISE!: VIRGINS CAN'T FATHER CHILDREN

All the opportunities I had to father a child I was repulsed by the women whom wanted my seed to be granted to them.

Likewise, it's entirely fair to say that I was selected against by only having sex with disgusting unattractive women. If I had been selected as a partner by an attractive, intelligent woman I may have been convinced by her to have a child together.

Natural selection at work.

>>82927729
A triple negative is still a negative anon. I'm not on the xitters side, purely because I find his choice of vocabulary pretentious. The actual content of his post is what's irrelevant.
And if you don't disagree with me, why even make that post?

>>82927774
Did you know? You can't father a child without having unprotected sex with a woman during possessing a functional womb and ovaries while she is ovulating. The odds aren't zero, but they steeply descend from 1/10 to 1/1000 as her age passes 20, to 30+. It is possible to make a woman pregnant where sperm is very rarely kept alive in the fallopian tubes prior to ovulation but this is exceptional.

Another known factor is the effects on sperm mobility due to hypothesized hormone like effects due to microplastics exposure in the bloodstream.

>>82927799
>>82927810
wau, the more you know

Due to the fact our birthrates are so steeply declining in excess of what we'd expect only due to mere economic or cultural factors these subjects are being studied extensively in medicine. We know for certain, albeit a clear conclusive theory remains hypothetical and requires further study that male fertility is directly affected by microplastics exposure.

For example, one rarely considered source of toxins is due to rubber tires near busy roadways. Those who live near a roadway experience far higher rates of a variety of illnesses and declining health compared to subjects who do not live near a busy roadway. There are thousands of these studies and the entirety of the explanation requires further decades. We will be looking back on our history however as we try to make up for it.

If for example China engages in land war with the United States and Canada or Europe there is little doubt we have no chance to survive such a conflict.

If you look at ONLY one factor like "feminism", you'd expect that women who are not part of this cultural phenomena would have much higher birthrates. That isn't the case. What we observe is that we're "missing" a "control" where birth rates are not declining.

So the hypothetical is obvious from there, "something is contributing to declining birthrate in excess of the contribution from solely cultural factors."

>>82927849
Consider people living next to highways are poorfags and poor people on average live 10 years less than rich people

We don't actually need a "control" strictly speaking because we have records of per-capita births versus deaths historically. We're still able to look back at records and determine solely from those records that birth rates are in fact declining.

Birth rates appear to be declining ... yet most obviously this is not a valid conclusion to draw solely from historical data. We need a control to verify experimentally what the contributing factors actually are.

When we actually compare to controls we see these declines across the board. This tells us IT IS NOT ONLY "feminism" or any other factor. There are hundreds of factors at play which all individually have small effects but when taken in product produce near the declines we've seen from records.

The issue is that when we take all the factors we can come up with and take the product of all those factors IT IS NOT ENOUGH to account for the complete decline.

So we KNOW we're missing A LOT OF IMPORTANT SHIT.

>>82927872
>Consider people living next to highways
Not highways, busy roadways. Upper-class regions in urban centers with the richest populations in the world. Mansions. Resorts.

Economics are controlled for in these studies which identify a severe impact of living near a roadway regardless of status or class.

>>82927899
You are an idiot there's already enough data out there that exists
Why is African birthrates increasing? Because they have the resources to create children. People living in urban societies today do not. Their resources are sucked dry into taxes rather than continuing to flow in an economic circle and rich people are reluctant to spend money as every transaction removes more money through taxes

Bureaucracy is killing birthrates. You would have to be blind to not see it

>>82927929
>Why is African birthrates increasing?
Their rates of infant death are sky high compared to western societies. Excluding the shitholes like the United States of Excessive Death.

>>82927849
>>82927913
>>82927904

>Those who live near a roadway experience far higher rates of a variety of illnesses and declining health compared to subjects who do not live near a busy roadway. There are thousands of these studies

Name 1

So you've nothing intelligent to contribute.

Let me know if you have an idea whilst you're busy thinking about this rather than having children, virgin.

>>82927939
they clearly have the resources to make so many babies it doesn't even matter that they die

something people in developed countries do not

>>82926981
I think it's multi-level irony satire posting actually. He agrees with the guy he's replying to in reality and wants to make the opposition look like complete pseudmaxxed jerkoffs

Are you retards genuinely arguing about the point in the tweet instead of the way he types? Are you all autistic? This is why you get bullied

>>82926981
just say you want to be like the taliban and for females to be property

>>82927473
One of the most accurate predictors od low birth rate is urbanisation. There isnt a single city im the world that has a positive fertility rate. Cities resemble ant colonies and human behaviour is very insect like.

>>82928015
I want women to be something even lower than property. Property has value. Women are an unfortunate biological necessity that should be handled in as unobtrusive and mechanical a way as possible, more like sewage than property.

>>82928103
That feels rather egotistical to force your beliefs on billions of humans, yet you are probably unprincipled to carry out those same beliefs on any woman you know.

>>82928103
>I want women to be something even lower than property.
nigga this my line, i came up with it. i'm glad it's spreading though

>>82928126
I pump and dump sluts which is the same way sewage is handled so I feel like I'm doing my part. Imagine if you had to juggle 5 different apps named things like "shittr" and "flush" to consistently find a toilet that voluntarily agreed to get shit in every time you had to take a dump.
>>82928132
As far as I know I came up with it, but I scroll past so many half-read posts I may well have gotten subconsciously inspired by you. We are brothers in spirit, regardless.

>>82928152
i'm the one who keeps saying that women should be lower than property/ slaves, as property still has rights. they should be treated as legal outlaws, outside of civilisation. it's much more coherent than what you're saying.

>>82928152
Why do you spend your time with random women instead of with one who will raise your progeny
Unless you intend to leave nothing behind when you die which is fine too

>>82928160
We are going to legitimately go extinct as a species (maybe for the best) if women are literally excised from existence. We have to keep them around, like it or not. An unfortunate biological necessity is what they are, and they should be treated accordingly.
>>82928167
I have no less than Three (3) bastard kids out in the world right now and those are only the ones I know of

>>82928177
i said outlaw them, not genocide them. treat them as entities without legal rights

>>82928177
Do you care that you share your time and 'wisdom' with incel strangers over someone who needs guidance in life (child)

>>82928235
I do not care, but when the oldest of them and the only one I'm in contact with at all gets to be ~16 he's going to start getting some absolutely lethal redpills on women from me

>>82926981
Okay I shall explain the joke.
He's talking like newspeak in 1984.

>>82928264
Isn't the whole point of newspeak that it simplifies language so people think less thoughts

>>82927369
Sheldon poster on too many adderal.

>>82928290
>As he watched the eyeless face with the jaw moving rapidly up and down, Winston had a curious feeling that this was not a real human being but some kind of dummy. It was not the man's brain that was speaking, it was his larynx. The stuff that was coming out of him consisted of words, but it was not speech in the true sense: it was a noise uttered in unconsciousness, like the quacking of a duck.
If it was exactly like newspeak, the joke would have been too obvious and doubleplusungood.

>>82926981
>2
>1
>3
it's so fucking tiring

>>82926981
Thank god you larper cucks are as much losers in general life as you are in your sex life and will never get anything done politically. Kys it's over from you.

birthrates are declining because

>people don't have any fucking money and life is more expensive
>people spend more time inside isolating on their computer instead of meeting new people in real life

it's not fucking rocket science

>>82928586
second one is true, first one is nonsense white people delude themselves with lol

>>82927033
It's retard muslims trying to shoehorn themselves into hardcore right-wing/white supremacist spaces.

Just another reason why the american right is doomed for infighting and failure

>>82926981
women are just not forced to marry losers anymore

File: IMG_0477.jpg (128 KB, 644x1219)

128 KB JPG

>>82927473
This has happened before, you just don't realize it because our fiat hasn't hyper inflated away our land has. The same thing since it is what we base our economy around, still this isn't unprecedented