I just masturbated to bestiality porn. It was a woman giving a blow job to a horse and the horse finished in her mouth. I feel like absolute shit. I'm racked with shame and guilt. What's happening to me?
>>82947161that's just the tip of the iceberg.DVGSD
Okay so stop
>>82947161Look up 'easy peasy way to quit pornography'You are essentially seeking new stimulation by consuming extreme content.
>>82947161oh my sweet summer child. your journey to not finding humans attractive is at your door step.
>>82947161it's just porn it's not hurting anyone you drama queen
>>82947229It's animal abuse and any foid involved in that should be thrown to a thousand crocodiles.
>>82947262Im sure animals like busting nuts as well anon
>>82947289The animal cannot consent. The girls are raping them. If you disagree then I implore you to watch a man have sex with a dog. You'll understand real quick that the man is raping the animal. It's a fucked up world we live in when we see a female raping an animal and think it's hot.
>>82947316[insert text]
>>82947161The answer is simpler than you think it is: lose the shame and guilt. Be a hedonist. Like what you like. Most importantly, be grateful you're not into anything genuinely harmful. It's not like the horse is going to be permanently traumatized from getting a bj in the same way that a human child would be from getting molested. You're fine.
>>82947196i can't believe basic bitch shit like that actually works for some people.i got bored after the 10th time they reminded me "hey you can just stop".
>>82947336rind et. al. found that most people who are molested are not actually traumatized for life. it's uncomfortable and unwanted but the great majority just get over it and go on living as you would expect from an unpleasant, but ultimately not ruinous experience.
>>82947316>The animal cannot consent.People who say shit like this tend to demonstrate that they don't really full understand what consent even is. Obviously bestiality can be abusive just as any other sexual act can be, but if conducted in a way that is respectful of the animals' wellbeing and autonomy, there isn't much cause for concern. >bro just watch a video wherein a man rapes an animal and you will clearly understand that all sex with nonhuman animals is inherently the same kind of rapeThat is some DUMB logic.
>>82947316>The girls are raping them.>If you disagree then I implore you to watch a man have sex with a dog.Hold on I think you make a leap here.
>>82947316Animal consent doesnt even matter, it's just not hot when a man does it.
>>82947161Read Peter Singer's essays on why bestiality is morally permissible under the right circumstances and free yourself of needless guilt.
>>82947196God I'm fucking glad I just got stuck in a loop lmaogiant boobs -> preggo -> SSBBW/feedism -> back to the start
>>82947391if it's permissible to murder animals for their meat, then why wouldn't it be permissible to murder their holes? checkmate.
>>82947161People legally and publicly jack off horses non-sexually/non-pornographically and get paid for it. They even pose for photos with the horse cocks with big beaming smiles and make cheeky TikToks where they play with them.
>>82947161Did you see the donkey one where the girl sucks on his huge balls?
>>82947316https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8r3IHDr7M2sPoor cat...
>>82947161>>82947439>horse>donkeyDon't these animals smell like shit? How do these girls deal with the smell?
>>82947347The thing is, this method doesn't encourage you to stop right away ,quite the opposite, in fact. It gives you a framework for adopting a new perspective on porn and questioning it in order to understand how futile it is.
>>82947161did you like the horse aspect or the dick being larger than your arm and insane amount of cum
>>82947439Point me in the right direction brochacho
>>82947467that's nothing futile about porn though. it arouses me, and then i masturbate and have an orgasm, and then i don't desire sex anymore. repeat daily. i've been doing this for decades.i've also had sex, with multiple women, including bareback sex with a gf for two years. and i'd much rather have sex honestly, except i can't stand other people and the dumb shit they want to do. so i jerk off instead. i've gotten exceedingly good at it.
>>82947161You're a man now, anon. Hold on tight.>>82947180>>82947336This
>>82947363Tell me you're Indian without telling me you're Indian.
>>82947196>quit pornographyi quit pornography due to moving to a place with thin walls and neighbors that made a big deal whenever i'd do itthe only thing giving up porn means is giving up a little bit of joy. Does giving up snack size packs of doritos change your life? of course not.
>>82947467face it, "easy way" fags are retarded in every addiction. the entire book is>just stop bro. you don't even need it. actually jerking off/drinking/smoking/shooting heroin sucks. think about it. it's not even that fun, why bother. just quitif this does it for you then congrats i guess, i know a lot of addicts are extremely low iq
>>82947491>i quit pornography due to moving to a place with thin walls and neighbors that made a big deal whenever i'd do itLMAO this nigga was blasting porn on the speakers!
>>82947161Bestiality is morally acceptable as long as the encounter is does not harm the animal in any material way and the human involved takes steps to counter the inherent power imbalance between the two; e.g. only engaging in sex with the animal once the animal initiates on their own volition, and stopping all activity the very instant dissent or discomfort is expressed by the animal.For instance, if you live with a dog and the dog mounts you and you accept your dog's advances, and interspecies mating commences as a result, totally fine. The dog is expressing enthusiastic consent and is highly unlikely to be harmed physically or emotionally by the encounter.If a horse gets an erection around you and directs a mating signal at you, and you decide to oblige, also fine. As long as the horse does not express discomfort with the encounter, they're again very unlikely to be harmed in any way by it.If the animal is drugged, coerced, trained or threatened into compliance, obviously that's not okay. That's abusive. You're fine.
i cant imagine being born past 2 fucking thousand with a phone in your hand from the time you were 5 years old and having shame over jerking off to any type of content. like how ingrained can fanatic religious teachings be to where you jerk off and think "oh noes maybe i shouldnt have done that :(" no one but you cares and there is 0 reason to.
>>82947161Are you mentally challenged or are you so deep in the addiction that you can't recognize how deranged what you're saying is.
>>82947492I think you need to be open-minded and honest to take in the information in these books. To reduce it to simple commands is wrong, especially when all the mechanisms behind dopamine and hormones are explained so that these urges can be better channeled. I hope that one day you will do so with genuine determination.
>>82947161>girl and a horsethats basically normie stuff in the bestiality world, dont feel too bad. maybe start feeling bad once you start watching dudes put worms inside their weewee or have wasps sting them on it to get off. anyway its just porn so you can just close the tab next time and goon to something else. if you keep having strong emotional reactions to it then i guarantee you that youll want to see more of it, so dont spiral into self blame because thatll make you want to watch it again. treat this as your little expedition into the goonverse and move on.>>82947464horses dont stink as much but donkeys fucking reek like something died in an open air septic tank and that stench remains stuck on you
>>82947571I quit drinking after a years long 750ml whiskey a day habit and easyway was one of the most retarded copes I ever saw on that trek. Even the AA book is better and that also sucks shit.
>>82947161yea see that sucks for you, retard, because while you have to recover from that fucked up shit in your psyche, my girlfriend is coming over so i'll be actually masturbating using her vagina you incel. then i cum inside of her raw, and i lick all parts of her butthole and all areas surrounding her butthole, you stupid porn watching incel
>>82947161i would kill for a cute girl that was completely fine with fucking animals.
>>82947161Hey, at least you didnt cum to scat porn or findom, thats what I tell myself at least
>>82947606fucking trannies isn't the same as having sex with a woman, retard
>>82947624not him but how the fuck does someone cum to findom?do they watch videos of bank accounts depleting to get off like some bizzaro world Jew
>>82947585drinking is for fucking morons, go fuck yourself
>>82947616no cute girls are into you, juan...
>>82947519It is not morally acceptable because animals do not have a level of consciousness similar to humans, and if nature has made it so that bestiality causes pathologies, it is for a reason. It is a deviance that must be eradicated, and all degenerates like you must be locked up in ovens.
>>82947489Anon, bestiality is like the whitest activity I can think of.
>>82947480it's weird to call your mother your gf, but. you see here you quadruple retard, if women actually respect you, they don't do stupid shit. that means you have to stop being an ugly gremlin looking fuck and then they will stop doing shit, you troll under your local fucking bridge
>>82947673I think its the humiliation of giving everything and not even being acknowledged, I pity those guys
>>82947698biggest cope denial ever seen in internet history, raheesh
>>82947316Consent in the context of bestiality is a red herring argument. Nobody cares about that in any other context.The notion of "informed consent" in the context of sex is the result people's religious beliefs. Sexual bonding is just like any other kind of bonding.
>>82947729reddit spacer, just relax yourself, okay
>>82947692>It is not morally acceptable because animals do not have a level of consciousness similar to humans, This isn't really true and doesn't really matter anyway. "Consciousness" is nebulous and difficult to define concisely, and varies wildly between species, but I think it's fairly safe to stipulate that the species of animals humans most commonly have sex with (dogs and horses) and every bit as conscious as they are.I think you mean they're not as intelligent as humans, and even that is a very complicated and nuanced subject to discuss. What matters is that the animals agency is left intact regardless of their level of intelligence or "consciousness", which is certainly an easy prerequisite to meet for morally permissible bestiality to occur. >and if nature has made it so that bestiality causes pathologies, it is for a reason. ?????What does that even mean? Can you elaborate?>It is a deviance Well of course, I never implied otherwise, but thy isn't necessarily a sign that it's morally bad. It's just abnormal.>that must be eradicated, Why?>and all degenerates like you must be locked up in ovens.I don't even have sex with animals. I just don't think it's inherently bad to do so. Also I think engaging in or encouraging genocides is far more morally transgressive than singular instances of bestiality could ever be, even if your intent is to only eradicate deviants.
>>82947772not reading all of this
>>82947336I have gone full hedonist, except there are aspects to me I will never morally accept, I've drawn a line under that and moved on but some people never fully accept their actions, particularly ones that contribute either directly or indirectly to the suffering of others, and I fully understand why.
>>82947316who is raping who in this video i am confused
>>82947798>I have gone full hedonist
>>82947787Fun fact: sex with animals is actually much safer than sex with humans from a communicable disease standpoint. Communicable diseases evolve toward transmission through most popular forms of interaction, and bestiality isn't that popular. For that reason, you're far more likely to catch or transmit a disease through sexual contact with your fellow human than with a dog. Of course, you can contract and transmit diseases through sexual contact with nonhuman animals, but none of them are diseases you wouldn't otherwise contract or transmit simply by being in the same room with them -- people love bringing up brucellosis when discussion the dangers of bestiality but forget that you'd catch or transmit it from mere close proximity, sexual contact not being necessary at all. There are many STDs that are communicable between people because, obviously, sex between people is more popular and thus a more promising method of survival for most viruses.
>>82947772>This isn't really true and doesn't really matter anyway.It does matter. Humans have a complex sense of self-awareness, metacognition (the ability to reflect on one's own thoughts), which allows them to engage in abstract reasoning and moral reflection. An animal cannot know whether what it is doing is right or wrong. Consciousness is likely a spectrum, and animals are not on the same level as humans.>What does that even mean? Can you elaborate?Relationships between species cause different infections. I encourage you to do some research because your stinky roasty vagina or penis must be full of bacteria.>Well of course, I never implied otherwise, but thy isn't necessarily a sign that it's morally bad. It's just abnormal.Any deviance that undermines the integrity of the group must be eliminated. I do not want subhuman creatures among my people.>Also I think engaging in or encouraging genocides is far more morally transgressive than singular instances of bestiality could ever beI will do it for the common good; individuals like you act out of pure selfish interest in order to satisfy your degenerate urges. That alone makes me more moral than you, even if I have to resort to radical methods.
>>82947804This video is raping my eyes
>>82947871>An animal cannot know whether what it is doing is right or wrong.Because those are human concepts that nonhuman animals don't typically abide by, or at least not in the same way humans do.The purpose of morality is to ensure optimal cooperation between humans to maximize the odds of human survival and the quality of human life. One could argue that the treatment of nonhuman animals is relevant to the standing of most humans' models of morality, and I would agree with that argument, but I would not agree that bestiality always inherently violates those structures logically.>Relationships between species cause different infections. So does virtually everything. You can get diseases from anywhere, including other humans. You can also avoid diseases with the right precautions, and bestiality isn't exempt from this. Your implication that 'nature' is a singular entity with explicit goals from which humans are somehow separate and insulated is...shaky at best.>Any deviance that undermines the integrity of the group must be eliminated.And how does bestiality inherently undermine the integrity of the group?>I do not want subhuman creatures among my people.It's very literally not possible at all to not live among nonhuman beings. You can't live in a hermetically sealed vacuum. You rely on everything around you.>I will do it for the common goodThis is I think the funniest thing you've said so far because genocide is a very clearly an inherently antisocial act that DOES totally undermine the purpose of constructing a society in which humans can live anyway, and the fact that you think you can utilize it as an instrument for removing a behavior that isn't even relegated to humans and creating a moralistic utopia is darkly ironic.
>>82947798>I have gone full hedonist,>exceptYou have not gone full hedonist.
>>82947161I did that shit too when I was high, it was disgusting but hot. once
>>82948041sorry, into the chambers you go
>>82947871you ever read someone's posts and you can just tell they're under 20 and unironically watch roman empire little dark age vhs edits on tiktok
>>82947992>Because those are human concepts that nonhuman animals don't typically abide byYes, so you confirm that humans do not operate like animals and that there is another dimension that allows harmony to be maintained among humans. If tomorrow everyone could rape animals and kill as they wished, we would not survive. >You can get diseases from anywhere, including other humans.Not only does this harm the animal because the sexual act causes cuts, but you also contract very serious diseases that are not found in humans. Nature designed us to reproduce with each other by having separate reproductive systems.>And how does bestiality inherently undermine the integrity of the group?You said it yourself, it goes against the survival strategy of humans and undermines cohesion. >It's very literally not possible at all to not live among nonhuman beings.I was talking about subhumans like you, not animals, and eliminating you would be easy because in the past, natural selection took care of you if you made decisions that went against the interests of the group.>genocide is a very clearly an inherently antisocial act that DOES totally undermine the purpose of constructing a society in which humans can live anywayOnce again, natural selection has been taking care of individuals who harm the group for thousands of years. Restoring balance is the most moral act an individual can perform. Listen furfag, you can continue to consume your degenerate content, but if it were up to me, I would throw you all off a roof (in Minecraft).
>>82948195>Yes, so you confirm that humans do not operate like animals Humans very literally are animals. Humans as a species operate in a way that is unique from the others, but then again, so does every other species. That's what a species is. >and that there is another dimension that allows harmony to be maintained among humansYes, a series of rules constructed by humans that allow for peaceful coordination between them. Bestiality doesn't inherently violate those rules because the act isn't inherently subversive to the prospect of th upholding of a stable human society. >If tomorrow everyone could rape animals and kill as they wished, we would not survive.I never advocated for the rape of animals, nor the murder of anyone. Again, the logical fallacy here is the assumption that bestiality is somehow a subversive act without an explanation as to how or why.>Not only does this harm the animal because the sexual act causes cuts,There are many forms of sexual encounters one can have with an animal that don't involve penetration in any form. Human may be penetrated by animals, or may penetrate animals with much larger orifices and thicker skin than they have, putting the animal in no danger of abrasion or skin tears. Remember, I stipulated that bestiality is fine as long as the animal is unharmed. Your assertion that bestiality ALWAYS causes some sort of physical harm demonstrates a limited view of what bestiality even is.>but you also contract very serious diseases that are not found in humans. See >>82947854. There are no communicable diseases one could contract from sexual contact with an animal that they wouldn't contract from any other contact or close proximity to that animal, and this isn't the case with humans. This means bestiality is actually safer than sex within species between humans.(Cont)
>>82948195>>82948337>Nature designed us to reproduce with each other by having separate reproductive systems.There's that confident assertion that Nature is a singular, non-contradictory being with explicitly stated intention and will. The appeal to nature is shaky because nature is not a good metric for human morality. Plenty of things are natural that humans tend to avoid, and many (most) of the things humans tend to do are "unnatural" in a sense -- this has nothing to do with the morality of the acts. Regardless, interspecies mating is perfectly natural contrary to your belief and can be observed across many other species with zero human intervention. Bestiality doesn't violate the laws of Nature, humans are not insulated or exempt from Nature, and Nature, in a sense, does not exist the way you think it does.>You said it yourself, it goes against the survival strategy of humans and undermines cohesion.No, it does not. I never said it does.(cont)
>>82948195>>82948337>>82948344>I was talking about subhumans like you, not animals, and eliminating you would be easy because in the past, natural selection took care of you if you made decisions that went against the interests of the group.If eliminating me were so easy, I'd be gone by now. You don't know who or where I am so there goes that dream. Turns out controlling human behavior isn't quite as cut and dry as you assume. It's one of the reasons genocides, while destructive, are never as successful as they're intended to be. Nevertheless, humans have been engaging in bestiality for the extent of human existence and noting about your disgust toward the act will change that. Natural selection hasn't eliminated bestiality in humans because it hasn't been evolutionarily advantageous for the behavior to go completely extinct. Cry about it.By encouraging genocides, all you're doing is weakening the contracts built to protect you in a misguided attempt to 'correct' behaviors that don't even need to be corrected because they aren't even wrong in the first place. It's a really stupid and myopic thing to do. >Once again, natural selection has been taking care of individuals who harm the group for thousands of years. You keep repeating this but also keep entirely skipping over the ways in which bestiality is inherently harmful to social dynamics as if your word is innate truth lmao. >Restoring balance is the most moral act an individual can perform.Genocide is the exact opposite of restoring balance.>Listen furfag, Not even a furry.>you can continue to consume your degenerate content, I don't consume bestiality pornography or furry pornography. I just have different views on morality than you. >but if it were up to me, I would throw you all off a roof (in Minecraft).I don't care. There's no logic to anything you say, and your opinion means nothing to me.
>>82947316Men having penetrative sex with animals is physically harmful for the animal, while a woman sucking off a horse doesn't necessarily imply any physical harm, and the animal can enjoy it. And people who say animals can't consent literature do not know what consent means. If a dog starts humping a leg, it means that dog wants to fuck. Women fucking animals is gross but it shouldn't he comparable to when men penetrate an animal.
>>82948603>Men having penetrative sex with animals is physically harmful for the animal,Not always. It depends on the animal and the conditions under which the encounter is taking place. If a man penetrates a horse, the horse will be fine, especially if the horse is aroused and actively flagging the man. Same with very large dogs, many breeds have penises that are larger than human penises on average.
>>82947161Irl beast is trash just jerk off to animated video instead, its ethical.
>>82947316When men rape small dogs who try but cannot fight back I agree. When a woman jerks off an unbridled creature 10 times her size, it cannot possibly be rape. You are mentally ill
>>82947576>donkeys fucking reek like something died in an open air septic tank and that stench remains stuck on youDidn't fear factor get cancelled because of the challenge where the contestants had to choose between drinking (very large amounts of) donkey cum, or donkey piss?
>>82947316Horses can't jerk off tho
>>82949465Male horses masturbate by thwacking their erect penises against their bellies until orgasm.
I did that once at like age 13.
>>82949659what does horse cum taste like
