there are only 100 actual unique real conscious human individuals on 4chan at any given time
I am the 1%. Never make threads but consistently hit 60+ posts/day.
>>83164810That's probabIy right
>>83164810I've dated 3% of 4chan?
>>83164810>Current Users: 228,360Horseshit, 200k bots and glowies more like lmao. Some boards are legitimately graveyards and there are several boards with no more than 50 or so in them at anytime. I wouldn't be surprised if /r9k/ was 80-120
>>83165334In /r9k/ has 80-120 real people on it then how is /po/ still a thing?
>>83165424/r9k/ is a fast board. /po/ is about 10 times slower, and they only have like 8-12 users. Didn't they just have a thread 404 after reaching bump limit that was up for five years?
>>83165334Have they ever stated how they generate the user count?
>>83165452idk but its bullshit, no way its 200k, i mean that doesnt even make sense, if u have a large brain just envision a board like r9k for example and imagine all the posts that are being made, u can't imagine there are more than say 110 people
>>83165486/r9k/ doesn't even make the top 10 for daily posts if you look on 4stats.ioMaybe it seems like there are fewer users because you don't use the fast boards.
>>83165593i use pol occasionally, can't be more than 200 posters there, rest are lurkers
>>83165452>>83165486It's unique IPs among all posts currently active (including archived threads) you retards
>>83165593The fast boards are mostly spam and slide.
>>83165334I think it's counting lurkers and people ban evading on cooldown
>>83165603we're talking about real normal homosapiens though
>>83165334unique monthly visits are 80 million, not unusual, look at twitter, youtube, or tiktok view counts
>>8316559979000 daily posts / 200 posters = 395 daily posts per posterI think you're just underestimating the number of posters, anon.
>>83165610>Have they ever stated how they generate the user count?Kys
>>83165622i ran into you earlier, so no, i'm not, also i post so much
>>83165630>i ran into you earlierHow do you know? What was I posting then?
>>83165638i don't remember, but i feel it on a metaphysical level
>>83165642If that's true then I hope you enjoy our interactions here.
>>83165613They have an authority score in the 50s/60s however which means the numbers are very dubious to trust. A farm can spit out as many as 10 million IPs in a week's time. The trick is when having to tie them to accounts does this start to fall apart. Basically 4chan's traffic is pointless to watch atm, could be many people actually here, could be several home servers churning out numbers, could be glowies trying to get narratives pushed. Now if half the stuff the US, UK and Australia is threatening to enforce next year actually happens we might get a clearer picture of this place and other websites. As it stands just assume it's all fake and for (You)s
You're probably right. Most of them are deterred from posting since gookmoot put this "wait 3 minutes to post" bullshit followed by a ridiculous CAPTCHA.
Not even close to being true
