Can you explain why you hated them in 2015 using facts and logic? Or will you finally concede that it was for no other reason than the fat losers around you hating them?
>>83260212I don't like censorious busybodiessimple as
>>83260212worst bait thread on /r9k/currently gj i guess
>>83260338>>83260368Nothing of substance to say, as I thought.
>>83260212Fat shaming is racist and mysoginistic. Hillary wouldnt want this, Kamala wouldnt want this. Do better
>>83260212This was literally the start of DEI and all the bullshit that sank games for like 8 years afterwards and only when games started to be complete financial losses in the early 2020s did companies take a step back and realize pandering to politics and people outside of the consumer base was a stupid fucking idea
i don't hate them and i want to fuck zoe quinn. why not make a thread for me?
>>83260212I like them. Bitches got too uppity and vocal, thus making the pendulum swing right
>>83260388Unfunny, but here's your (You)>>83260389How did games pander to politics? Can you explain in a way that makes you sound less retarded?
>>83260402instigator stop instigating
>>83260402>Unfunny You have no argument so you turn into a blatant hypocrite.
gamergate turned some slut fucking reviewers for her shitty text game into a UN ambassador lmaoeveryone forgot gaming/journalists collude and have secret email rings and groups to push agendas
>>83260402The OP nigga unintentionally makes a good point.What world do we live in where number of genders is an political issue? back then it was more about which duchy should be conquered next or how much power should the constitution grant to the parliament
>>83260413Yes, I have no argument to pick with the unfunny guy making "umm akshually" jokes. Do you know what the word hypocrite means?>>83260421Provide evidence to back up your claims.
>>83260338>I don't like censorious busybodiesName a single time Anita wanted anything to be censored. Shining a light on problems is not the same as saying something should be illegal. In fact she often went out of her way to say that it's entirely possible to enjoy something while at the same time being aware and critical of its flaws.
>>83260428>I have no argumentA large part of gamergate had to do with body issues. You fat shaming is contributing to the problem. The internalized misogynoire REEKS
>>83260428>Provide evidence to back up your claims.she's hot, what more evidence do you need?
>>83260413>argument>hypocritethese words have no meaning, only emotional charge
>>83260438They have meanings but you are just autistic. Facts dont care about your feelings.
>>83260452I guess you'll have no problem with explaining these words then, will you?
>>83260212Participating in pushing DEI and censorship of games and journalism using secret network of janitors.Also exchanging sex for favors and lying about it.
>>83260472Provide evidence to back up your claims.
>>83260462Do you possess capabilities to understand?
>>83260402There is nothing funny about fat shaming.
>>83260479no i don't think she would, that's the cultural differences meme
>>83260479Google it.
>>83260482I can't see any definition in this thread so no, my sight fails me.
zoe quinn? was the one who falsely accused a guy of rape, the guy went on to kill himself
>>83260428>Provide evidence to back up your claims.go back newfag
>>83260489My question has been answered. Shame
>>83260487Google said that's a myth. Besides, you're the one who made the claims, the burden is on you to substantiate them, not on me to disprove them.
>>83260490that's not the full story
>>83260495coolmine's been not, go on
>>83260508We can't have it all
>>83260514yeah, maybe you'll get the dick wet next life
>>83260402>How did games pander to politics?inserting lgbt and gender politics everywhere in every piece of dialogue (dragon age the veilguard) for pure liberal/leftist activism and giving trivia about the torah in tlou2 because it's a minority religion; but you like to pretend stuff like that is not that bad or that it's not a thing because it aligns with your political beliefs (and you don't play games yourself, so you don't know how it feels like to have your space invaded by outsiders and having it turned it to shit) so you already come off as disingenuous.
>>83260212they were the vanguard of our current misery
>>83260514NTA but you're squirming around avoiding the simple request to define the words you used. What an illiterate dumbass.>>83260536>you don't know how it feels like to have your space invaded by outsidersWhy would anyone want anything to do with gaymers? Let people play what they want. What are you, the woke mob? We have freedom of speech, we can make whatever games we want, and put whatever characters we want. Stop trying to censor video games.
>>83260536>so you don't know how it feels like to have your space invaded by outsidersdo people really think this or is it some parroting of /v/ crying that AAA games are AAA games
>>83260562>NTA but you're squirming around avoiding the simple request to define the words you used.asking the impossible, take it easy
>>83260501>that's not the full storywhat is it then?
>>83260532Seething significantly>>83260562Not an argument
no one actually hates zoe quinn. she's like jenny robot. suletta muercury. she's a legendary iconic personanita is ok too
>>83260592>no one actually hates zoe quinnbitch's kinda forgotten, I'm wondering if people rekindle the arguments like this thread out of nostalgia
>>83260499You are bad at googling.
>>83260562>Why would anyone want anything to do with gaymers?idk, go ask the DEI patrol and the people funding this shit; the trail is there, just follow the money.>Let people play what they want>Stop trying to censor video games.that's my line>we can make whatever games we wantexcept you don't make anything, you just invade well established franchises and studios and turn it to shit; and even when you try to create something your own it just flops really bad.everything you say comes off as disingenuous.you're just like this fag that was bitching about Valve not having enough fag employees.
>>83260620No evidence, as I thought. You're bad at not just googling, but also critical thinking.
>>83260628>go ask the DEI patrolForgot to take your antipsychotics today I see.
>>83260638>non argumenti accept your concession
>>83260653Simply returning your non-argument in kind.
>>83260630Not my problem you are bad at googling.Try harder or fail.
>>83260604maybe i have a chance now that she's out of the spotlight
>>83260660If you had evidence, you'd have shared it by now. But you have nothing.
>>83260682this is ancient lore alreadyyou either weren't there or too stupid to be on 4chan you can't find out
>>83260718>"The evidence exists, but only special people who were there know about it, and also you're too dumb to understand anyway."This is getting boring for me.
>>83260733kek no it isn't you'll be posting more posts as soon as you see one in blue
>>83260682You failed. Your loss.
>>83260733>and also you're too dumb to understand anyway."That is your case indeed
>>83260741I was talking to just that anon, but honestly I might abandon the thread. None of you have anything to say but "not an argument, DEI, *other stupid shit I heard from some streamer*"I'll let you stew in your own misery.
>>83260781>makes thread expecting people to reply>people reply>throws tantrum and leavesSo, what were you even trying to accomplish?
>>83260781ok, bye, don't make a garbage thread next time
They are not attractive so I don't care who they are, lmao.
>>83260718>too stupid to be on 4chanbold assumption that there is "too stupid"
>>83260212There are no more beautiful women in AAA gaming. They won.
>>83260881what about z quinn?
what's next, OP? going to ask us why we're not all on board with Greta, and then sperg on us demanding proof when we point out that she's an inorganic astroturfed puppet born to Swedish gated society antifa elite?
>>83260212Ugly women who also knew because they are women they can make money shilling this grift much like the Comic Code did for decades before they got shut down for being a whole scheme.In classic feminist fashion in the end it was not even their own ideas but their boyfriends who just needed money to pay for a vacation they were planning. It's all quite funny.But yeah now women in video games are as ugly as the people who complain about it
>>83260212Quinn was a prime example of the incestuous nature of games journalism and tried to hide her deleterious nature behind "you just hate women". Sarkeesian was the exact same brand of moral postulating as Jack Thompson "video games make people violent/sexist!" with zero real world research or meaningful insights. Both of them essentially said "people are mean to me and disagree with liberal arts interpretation of pop culture so that means I'm right about everything :("
>AnitaShe never had a single original thought, she was just the puppet for a guy's opinions reading his script. She scammed her kickstarter backers by cutting her series short, hired a convicted pedo for her twitch moderating staff, and engagement baited at every chance she got, solely for victim cred. A literal study was done by both the FBI and independent academics and barely 1% of any gamergate post on twitter would even mention her, or Zoe. But she milked it for everything she could.>ZoeGreased palms to get Depression Quest covered by journos. The majority of coverage of the event was focused on the five guys, because they're journalists that know better, but she threw herself in front of all serious criticism of people like Nathan Grayson. She had a history of pulling stunts to get attention, including going to wizardchan to shit talk herself anonymously and immediately posting the 12 second old screencaps to twitter to start a campaign against wizardchan. Once again GG posts on social media rarely if ever emphasized Zoe because she's a literally who and the focus of GG was journalistic impropriety, which was proven at SPJ AirPlay, but every sliver of attention was milked to death and she rode it all the way to the UN.I'd go into further depth but I'm phoneposting and the old info aggregators like DeepFreeze aren't around anymore.
>>83260956>Jack ThompsonOh man, remember the guy whose life was ruined because he posted on twitter to defend the existence of a flash game where you punch Anita Sarkeesian, directly based on the Jack Thompson game of the same premise, and the Canadian courts were like YOU CAN'T WORK YOUR JOB ANYMORE AND YOU CAN NEVER POST ON THE INTERNET AGAIN EITHER, ALSO, HERE'S A FINEBecause it's Anita who's powerless in that situation, right?
>>83260212>Believe all women (even when they're lying)this alone is why I hate feminist freaks, disregard for the rule of law, guilty of rape until proven innocent, nonsensical demands like 50% women at all leadership roles in society when most of them don't want to be leaders, video games (fantasy) need to reflect reality but only their warped version where ugly butch dykes with a disability are the lead characters, they are jealous of beautiful women with tits and ass and want to disenfranchise them out of pure spite, their whole position is based on vibes ie neither facts nor logic so we don't even need facts or logic to point out obvious bullshit
>>83260933Zoe was kinda cute in her prime, def would. Anita was sub mid tho.
What a shit thread. OP should be killed for this.
>>83260432>Having attractive women is a flaw And this is why you lost the popular vote.
>>83261009>CanadaDon't feel bad for them they voted for it.
>>83260212I completely ignored gamer gate. I guess I'm a bit of a sigma.
>>83260212What do you mean hate half the nerds on 4chan wanted to fuck them I know I'm not the only one
>>83260212why the fuck are bitches from a 1st world white country complaining in the UN about oppression. Women in other countries have actual problems like getting their pussies sewn shut, getting gangraped, and honor killed for being raped.
>>83262451You don't understand...Anita Sarkeesian was accused of being a scam artist and a mouthpiece for a more competent man! ignore the fact that both accusations are true.
>>83262021indeed, we lost the popular vote because the majority of people are the kind of stupid that would think Anita's arguments boils down to "attractive women".
>>83262481You're right. Her argument's worse than that. Her argument is that ALL portrayals of women, positive and negative, are actually harmful, and that whether you lean into their femininity or treat gender as incidental you're a sexist anyway.
>>83260971How Tf do you know who these bitches are, let alone so much details about them? Fucking KEK
>>83262647Because they got a free ride across the entire journalistic medium! Anita Sarkeesian and Zoe Quinn are literally talking to the United Nations in the OP image you fucking idiot.
>>83262597Very incorrect. I don't know where you guys get this nonsense from.
>>83262681zoe quinn's beautiful face
>>83262681She literally explains IN HER SERIES TROPES VERSUS WOMEN how every portrayal of women in fiction is harmful and sexist. Whether she's a damsel, strong and independent, equal to her male counterparts, skimpy, or too chaste. If she leans into her feminine sexuality, it's bad, but if she's asexual or butch, that's bad too.She literally runs the whole spectrum of fictional portrayals and labels them all sexist in different ways, until there's literally no depiction that would fit her standards. You know why? Because all her points are ripped from Bell Hooks who's equally stupid.
>>83262699they didn't let kanye make a game either but he still got the bear guy
>>83262714what in the shitting hell are you talking about
>>83262687is so beautiful you should be justified to say it falls flat on principle
>>83260956I don't know how Gamer Gate blew out of control. Any rational person should have just said, "These feminists are dimwits looking for attention within a hobby they don't actually like." and moved on.Instead the entire planet changes forever and every interaction on the internet is some kind of culture war conflict. Like GG is now as significant of a social event as Martin Luther's Protestant reformation or Napoleon's conquest.
>>83260212I still hate them and everything else associated with gaymurrg8 for what it did to society at large. People had been hand-wringing that muh vidya gaems would be the downfall of society, and we all thought it would be because people were too distracted to play them to do actual work, but instead, we got whatever the fuck we got with the culture wars into the present.
>>83262795It's because it exposed a MASSIVE problem with the mainstream media that only seemed to be more and more widespread the more closely you looked. It wasn't about Zoe Quinn and Anita Sarkeesian and Brianna Wu. It never was, until media outlets gave them more and more space to lie about it. It was about the journalists. Kotaku, Gamasutra, Giant Bomb, IGN, even mainstream journalistic outlets that don't normally talk about games at all like MSNBC and CNN. Not one outlet was without sin. aGGros were totally fine with defending the reputation and actions of evil people just to win points against gamers, people like Sarah Nyberg (srhbutts), admin of FFShrine and cousin-fucking pedo. There was even an apparent case of literal ISIS money going toward the aGGro journalists??? I swear to god there was a whole deep dive called "anti-gamergate is literally ISIS" but it's not on youtube anymore.
>>83262699>She literally runs the whole spectrum of fictional portrayals and labels them all sexist in different ways, until there's literally no depiction that would fit her standards. Except that she literally has several episodes, "Positive Female Characters in Video Games", praising certain characters for having basically no such flaws. As for the ones she does have criticisms of, you make it seem like they are such a vast spectrum of different characters, when in reality the long list of characters she talks about are all just different versions of the same few tropes. These tropes are tropes precisely *because* there are so many characters based on such templates. And that is the entire point she is trying to make in her series. And also, you make it seem like her judgement of characters are binary, either they are "up to her standard" or they are simply bad, when in reality she always reiterates that just because one aspect of a character is a problematic trope, that doesn't mean that the rest of the character's writing can't have merit or can't be appreciated. Her goal is clearly not to condemn, but to help the industry improve, step by step.
>>83262852Did anyone figure out why? Why the media supports those weirdos and had it out for video game fans?Just corruption? Is game journalism a front for criminal money laundering?Some forced social movement? Did they actively want the fallout from a gender war? So did we play into their hands?
i think you mean "8.8" anyway
>>83262940The problem is that even her positive characters could easily be put under the umbrella of her criticism.>the entire point she is trying to make in her seriesI think you mean "he." Because she didn't write the show.
>>83262946are you fucking dumb. do you have a brain
>>83263018>I think you mean "he." Because she didn't write the show.No, I meant she. It doesn't matter whether she delegated writing tasks to some employees of hers or not, this is very clearly still her message and the videos are her brainchildren.
>>83260432>Shining a light on problemsthere were no problems. Not even gonna entertain rest of the post
>>83263596>employeesIt was the project lead. Jonathan McIntosh.
>>83260212>hard evidence emerges that "gaming journalism" is corrupt >gaming journalists cover for themselves by claiming persecution for their gender>left wing retards latch on to it>right wing retards latch onto it>the grifting journalists benefit massively from itAnita and Brianna had literally nothing to do with it, they just cynically inserted themselves into it in an attempt to further their careers. And it worked.
>retard feminists fuck game journos to get their shitty game highly rated abd get articles published to advertise it>get called out>gaslight everyone who noticed as icky gamers who hate women>cry in front of UN>normalfag news outlets and progressive cuck gamer journo outlets shit themselves running a gaslighting campaign>creates a massive rift of a divide between men and women and smart people and dumb idiots in gaming community>to this day the faggot cuck progressives wil try to ruin your life if you ever try to denounce the "history" they literally spent millions of dollars trying to rewrite>"why are u mad chuddy lole"I justed wanted to play some actually good fucking video games and not have a million and one uppity soicucks shove shit in my face and try to social engineer me.
>>83262670And? Why do you care about them? They are not gonna read this bro, sorry haha.
>>83263754>integrity? In MY journalism?? Lol do u evn care haha
>>83263716this is excessive, i don't know who did all of this
The psyop that began the redpilling of an entire generation of gamers
>>83263769Its just some game bullshit, it literally doesn't matter. You read reviews written by sois and women?
>>83260824Get attention? That's the mexcrement feminist's favorite thing
>>83263811>it doesnt matterAnd nothing you have posted here does either so why have you been here for hours?
>>83260212The typical spiteful, hateful, misandrist feminists. Wouldn't spare a drop of cum for any of this subhuman ilk.
>>83260536>inserting lgbt and gender politics everywhere in every piece of dialogueNever happened.I looked online and some rough estimates say over 500,000 video games have been created through all time. If only 1/1000 of them are good, that's still 500 good video games.There are probably only like 3 video games in that set of 500 that insert 'gender politics', and probably none of them do so for more than the tiniest fraction of their game.Such things simply do not exist at any scale.
>>83260402>>83260562>>83260638>>83260657Nice trolling bro. You got'em seething.
>>83263869lmao do you really think anyone is gonna fall for such stupid bait?
>>83263906Realistically the number of worthwhile games that have even a tiny amount of "gender politics" can be counted on one hand, if that. It's just a fact.To really cut to the heart of things though, you should never give people more power over you than what is absolutely necessary. Play singleplayer games. If you play multiplayer games, prefer games with a big modding culture, games with private servers, etc. If you must play on a central server, avoid using 1st party communication tools for anything that isn't strictly necessary to the game. If you play matchmaking games, don't complain when the algorithm gets tweaked into shit. If you don't want to be vulnerable to loss when something bad happens to a gameserver or your account, don't play grindy MMORPGs or gambler games. Don't buy shit in video games.It's just like big tech and software stuff. People like me never have a problem with it since we just use open source software and host our own shit. Capability based security, compartmentalization, etc etc.The common thread here is that there exists a 'contract' that you 'sign' by engaging with a service or using a tool in a certain way, or by getting into a social situation. You people are prone to signing contracts without reading them or bending the world in your favor, and when the devil and his details burn you up you pretend that you were wronged by anyone but yourself.There are hundreds, perhaps thousands, of good video games and almost all of them will stay the same forever. If I don't like a part of it I mod it out! If the contract of playing the game involves giving someone power over me, I read the god damned contract. Very few of the good games in this world involve any such things though, because otherwise they wouldn't be good games.
>>83263990This is the reason why gamergate was a massive nothingburger.Does one bad game being made matter?Nope. All the good games still exist and more are made all the time.Does low quality or even biased/malicious journalism matter?Not a bit. All news and social media and any narratives or ideas derived from them are fictional unless proven otherwise. There is never a reason to consume them unless you define in advance the specific goal for consuming them and assemble proof that they efficiently get you to your goal.Your epistemology should be so robust that "ethics in games journalism" doesn't even matter. It should be literally impossible for the contents or proportions of what is covered by news sources to influence your opinion. Your interests must utterly precede the influence of public opinion on your life.If the inclusion of a quote about gay people in 1 of thousands of good video games, or the low quality of news sources, is capable of causing you negative emotions, then you reveal yourself as being vulnerable to such things in the first place. If you're vulnerable to that, you're vulnerable to literally anything and there are probably thousands of interests successfully manipulating your opinions right this very moment.Gamergate was a psyop.
>>83263869Is this why everyone is just falling over themselves to play the latest AAA games known for being written by these types of people, who are such a tiny minority they run entire studios and get spotlighted by publishers?
>>83264159The opinions of "everyone" don't fucking matter. If they matter to you, congratulations, your brain has a massive, gaping backdoor in it that lets anybody rule you.Start with the basics. Play a game. Create your very own criteria for appraising game quality. Grade the game's quality. Find someone (a website, a person, a business) that creates or vouches for games. Grade a representative sample of those games. Now you know the quality of game you can expect them to make or vouch for.Once you have enough grades you can even make proxies, where you notice a pattern among games of a particular grade and thus can even tell with decent probability if a game has a particular grade before you play it (don't rely too much on proxies without updating them though).This type of strategy doesn't go just for games, really anything. Notice how public opinion never factors into it. YOU decide your own criteria. You judge for yourself! Not anybody else. God, there are so good games I couldn't play them all. Maybe if I were immortal and lived for 10000 years, long enough to play every game, I would have enough time to play all the shit games and muse about their quality (or lack thereof).I don't even know how I would be aware of such a problem without 4chan telling me about it. If I just encountered a game with bad writing in the wild I would just remark to myself>gee, poor writing in this game loland go about my day, maybe choose another game if that one was bad enough.
Mostly I got onboard with GG because I already hated feminism on account of I hated the age of consent and realized feminism was responsible for it because jealous roasties and it was a great opportunity to do a lot of damage to feminism. It worked great and now discussion of how the age of consent is bullshit is entering the mainstream discourse because Donald the orange nigger couldn't keep it in his pants.>>83263778Looks yummy desu.
>>83264276If it isn't good, and gets widely mocked and criticized by the internet at large, AND it fails to sell enough to turn a profit, then how do you think it keeps getting made and pushed in media outlets? Because by the industry's estimation, Concord was so good it warranted a half a billion dollars. And a dozen other games the same year got massive budgets and publisher support too, before flopping hard.Almost like the issue isn't just "it bad lol just move on" because these companies impose it on an otherwise unwilling audience. Almost like indie games with more tact and less bullshit preaching are getting people's money because AAA has completely lost the plot.
>>83264331Why are you on about the age of consent todayIf you wanna fuck kids go be an imam
>>83264402Statements like this only make Islam look more appealing. I don't know what you think you're accomplishing by going hurr durr mudslimes.
>>83264373>unwilling audienceOxymoron. If the audience is interested in quality and continues to play something, then by definition it must be quality in their eyes. If it's not quality to them, they stop playing. The point is moot. It is impossible to be forced to play a video game, since they are a voluntary activity and because there are so many video games available to play, such as those indie games you mention.If your point is that certain "AAA" (lol) games don't match the qualities you or a particular profile of poster like, uhhh cool. But it's not worth a political crusade or anything. You just say yeah this is crap guys, it's crap because X, Y, Z, don't buy it.Is there a reason to hate someone for making a low quality game? I don't think so, I think I just won't buy it.
>>83264461To clarify, if someone has a reputation for making good games and then starts making bad games, there is nothing that needs to be said other than that those new games are worse according to some criteria, maybe a description of different new parts of those games. Then everyone can use their own judgement to mentally decrease the reputation of those people in the context of game development. This is a very mundane affair.
>>83260212Because I was a Chud that couldn't respect others. But now I've learned and become a better man.
>>83264461These games have no audience left, and yet keep getting made and given a platform by media outlets. I haven't spent a dime on AAA in over 6 years, anon. I'm saying that nobody wants this, it's being injected into existing IPs like dog medicine in a slice of cheese, and those who end up tricked by said IPs immediately stop playing and refund.It goes against market demand, yet continues to get funding injected into it by political investors looking to manufacture their """modern audience."""
>>83260212I love Anita Sarkeesian because retards got so mad at her they gave her a platform at the United Nations. You white fags hated her so hard you gave set her up for generational success. Stay mad.
>>83264507and she proceeded to do nothing with that "platform" besides grift off stupid libshits like you.
>>83264504>and yet keep getting made and given a platform by media outlets. The point I made earlier in the thread is that no one should be paying attention to 'media outlets' in the way that is popular to do. If they are doing what you claim they are doing, then they are clearly structurally broken and don't deserve their reputations. I would even go as far as to say that no one should be implicitly trusting media outlets on anything at all. They should define what information they want first, then go and find outlets and prove whether those outlets have reliable information in that context, and only use those outlets for that specific information the outlets were proven to be good for. If this were the dominant pattern of news consumption then the problem of news manipulation and alleged 'demand manufacturing' would not exist.By refraining from trusting them too much in the first place, there would be no outcry when an outlet reports on things in a different way than before. The way in which people decide to trust information should be invulnerable to the proportions of what a news outlet does/does not speak about and how they speak about it.
>>83264616Utopianism serves nobody. I'm not a media truster. Frankly, being at ground zero on August 28th 2014, I would be retarded to trust a journalist ever again. But the populace are not critical thinkers. Narrative crafting works all too often.
>>83264526>and she proceeded to do nothing with that "platform"And you're are mad she gets wealthy from doing nothing. Tomorrow is Monday wagie, it's almost bedtime.
>>83260212Weren't they basically pro censorship masquerading as women's liberation?
>>83260212They hurt videogames, movies, and TV shows. All because they needed stories to focus on them and only them.
>>83264677>from doing nothingDEBATE STATUS: WON [opponent admitted he clearly lied]cope and seethe status: imminent
>>83260212Basically feminist versions of Andrew Tate and opened the doors to grifting being acceptable.A decade later I not only was proven correct in my hatred but they inspired the right wing to grift harder than ever before
>>83264507None of this is grassroots. She was likely pushed by them from the beginning. The Un is like groundzero for Globohomo/anti-male/feminism.
if you didnt want President Donald Trump to airstrike narcoterrorists in international waters and a complete immigration moratorium you should have stopped Zoe Quinn from banging all those dudes
>>83265178Honestly its crazy how basically 90% of the culture war shit goes back to gamergate desu. Should've just let us play comfy vidyagaems.
>>83260212It was definitely the case of sheeple being sheeple.Imagine someone caring that much about what a reviewer says in 2025. They would be mocked and treated like ad spammers that the incompetent moderators fail to delete, just like the current spammers about hasan, molyneux, that wayne twitter account, etc.
>>83265495Women can't do that, though. The video games weren't about them, and they hate seeing men happy.
>>83265504U rite u rite. The issue is we didn't gatekeep women from our hobbies hard enough.
>>83264918Oh my nigga, that was LITERALLY provenhttps://old.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/1bezhho/usaid_internal_documents_reveal_government_plot/https://old.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/1ij35pc/grummz_holy_sht_usaid_paid_politico_to_have/https://old.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/1ijyufw/fact_check_sweet_baby_and_feminist_frequency/
>>83265495If you had said this as little as 3 years ago, some gaymurrg8tor mentally stuck in 2016 would have started spamming jargon from that era to derail the thread. Back then, IRL, anyone who heard about it thought it was the stupidest thing they'd ever heard of. And look where we ended up.
>>83260212These two women are responsible for Trump becoming president. Twice!AAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
>>83260212People are going to flame you in the replies if you are a big person on the internet, you dont deserve to speak about it in congress over it. Thats stupid.
>>83264507how about dat marriage-themed birthday party, lil' troonie?
>>83263639Jonathan was a producer acting on Anita's instructions and direction. Thus Anita is the creator and I meant she, not him.
As I've gotten older I've realized they were unironically right about most things. Maybe they were a bit cringe with how they presented themselves but I can't really say I disagree with anything they said.
>>83264507They didn't give her anything retard, she was given a platform to shill and lie on for social engineering purposes. She got a lot of money personally but the end result was that a lot of moneyfags lost a lot of money down the road on their shitty games when they stuffed them with poz and affirmative action hires and they flopped.
>>83260212I didn't hate them. they were triggering the chuds. good job
>>83264677you got duped by a lazy entitled bitch hahahahahha
