ls it reasonable?
>>83278052Yes, everyone is poor and struggling, we're all isolated due to technology as well, and there are easily accessible contraceptives.It makes total sense.
>>83278082>everyone is poor and strugglingNot true, this would actually boost birth rates. Nobody shits out kids as fast as poor people.
>>83278103Poor dumb people who have always been poor and will forever be poor, we're talking about the middle class experiencing what it's like to live paycheck to paycheck or in some debt here, this is another Great Depression even if almost no one is saying it.
>>83278052lots of downies and autists are about to be unleashed
>>83278052Reasonable? Not really. Good for humanity? Not in the short term, but in the long-term it's a selection pressure for longer lifespan.
>>83278052don't see the issue of less being children born out of an accident, and having to be "raised" by a single teen mom
>>83278144Are longer lifespans a good thing?This planet is hell, being old is hell, why would we want to prolong this?
I was such a fucking tard at 18-19. I'm so glad I didn't have a kid then. Now I'm 40 and could do a dramatically much better job.
>>83278171Yeah. A lot of the reasons this planet is hell in the first place is because of high time preference people. When you care less about getting gratification in the moment and can look forward to enjoying your rewards in the far future then you actually work to better it.
>>83278184>When you care less about getting gratification in the moment and can look forward to enjoying your rewards in the far future then you actually work to better it.Except this isn't how people actually think, delayed gratification has no relation to life expectancy, what you're saying would require a cultural shift.
>>83278052Now do per a capita, obviously hags will reproduce more when there are far more of them.
>>83278082Retard, poverty actually makes women have children younger, any poor city and country will show that. What makes young women wanting to "enjoy their youth" and not have children is actually good quality of life and more womens rights, thats why third worlds and repressive culture countries are growing and first progressive worlds are declining in population.
>>83278441These people are like AI, pre-prompted to never draw conclusions from patterns repeated throughout time and space.
>>83278441Or, you know, the other factors I mentioned like being isolated due to their crippling TikTok and instagram addictions, using contraceptives like birth control, and just having less sex in general.But sure, keep believing your stupid shit too, I guess.
>>83278454I'm bringing up the reality of our American world, and you're bringing up irrelevant facts about poor people which don't reflect how we, people who aren't poor niggers and rednecks or third worlders live, but I'm the AI?Get fucking bent.
>>83278052>ls it reasonable?What is per capita.
>>83278052If hags don't want to get pregnant then they should stop being so hot, and letting me cum inside them. Dummies. Typical women. Always blaming men, and not taking accountability.
>>83278467Yeah, theres no Instagram and contraceptives in poor countries where there is a high rate of teenage pregnancy.
>>83278501I know you're being a facetious cunt, but there is a real world basis in what I'm saying, and it's so obvious that as places modernize there is a noticeable decline in birth rates.Crazy, I know, to think that people have less sex if they're not constantly seeking each other out in person, so much so that you guys must be right despite the evidence stacking in my favor. :)
>>83278052The better question to ask is "what happened in 2007-2008?">>83278545Right or wrong, you are an insufferable faggot.It's a combination of both quality of life and virtualisation of human interaction, and you know it. Mostly because the first one allows for the second.
>>83278858>The better question to ask is "what happened in 2007-2008Iphone was released and normies girls became connected to internet
