how do we trust men to lead entire countries if they can't be trusted not to sexually assault a little girl if she wears a skirt?
>>83425548technically you can't trust anyone to run the country because corruption is rampant.
>>83425548Because women would import infinite third-worlders to rape the little girls.
>>83425548because women literally appoint AI as ministers in places like albania
>>83425548Can't trust someone to run a country if they aren't willing to do some bad things to keep their own on top. That's why all successful eople are "psychopaths". Society only wants normal people to be safe and well behaved because it doesn't benefit society for the masses to have the same self-deterministic philosophy as their leaders.
>>83425558i can trust a woman more though as a rule of thumb
>>83425548how do we trust muslims and niggers to be let into our country if they can't be trusted not to form rape gangs and assault people for wearing the wrong colored clothing on whatever side of ghetto avenue they live on
>>83425548We cannot trust man or woman to lead us. We need God to show up now. If not God, the nearest approximate. The Machine
Never trust any politician, they're all pedophiles and are full of greed. They don't care about you at all, they care about the money you make for them
>>83425548Running a country and being a pedophile are two different things. Most famous people in history are pedophiles, or somewhat sexually distorted. It their burden. You just need to look at the good side. Let them do their good work, put them in jail later.
>>83425791i can trust women since they arent violent pedophiles though
>>83425740sure, but if you make women compete with men the men will dominate them, so it would be bad from an IR perspective. this isn't the friendly world of whatever country you're from, it's cutthroat global anarchy
>>83426174this dumb ass nigga has never heard of the western school system
>>83426191is there something in the western school system that changes the gender ratio in crime stats
>>83426174At some point you have to wonder if fucking a kid in the ass is the worst thing you can do to them.
>>83426211The majority of sex offenders and domestic violence perpetrators are women. Whatever statistics you think you know about are falsified and you're retarded for believing what the world wants you to about women somehow being less violent or more well adjusted.
>>83426211>>83426215>>83426228>https://www.newsweek.com/woman-killed-five-month-old-baby-not-guilty-11088773>Woman found "not guilty by reason of insanity" for killing her 5 month old child- despite literally having done it.>crime statistic does not properly change due to the outcome of the trial, thus skewing data by under-reporting the full scope of womens violent nature>men blamedmany such cases
>>83426174Women are incapable of statecraft. The female brain is incompatible with serving national interests. Women always tend towards mediocrity and conformity, traits which guarantee their country becomes a vassal for globalist interests.
>>83426252rare instances like this are balanced out by the women who are falsely accused.
>>83425568Maybe we should let some retarded whore run this shithole. Lol
>>83426274>"Rare instance"cursory google search reveals thousands of examples>False AccusationsThe percentage of men who have been falsely accused is exponentially greater- so much so that in comparison you have to wonder just what makes women such vile and despicable creatures.
>>83425548All pedos should be executed, no exception.
>>83425548Because men are more competent on average and their proclivity to abuse women has nothing to do with their ability to lead a country.
>>83426843Research disagreeshttps://leadershipcircle.com/blog/who-runs-the-world-girls/>Additionally, female leaders score higher in their effectiveness than male leaders and are likely to lead by example more frequently and more effectively than their male counterparts.
>>83426875Because nations and states were born from warfare and you women are cowards, so thats why you cant run shit and when you do, you just turned it into waste.If you were capable you would have build your own female empire, instead of leeching out of men like you always have done.
>>83426908Creating an empire implies a will to crudely exploit others in a specific way that isn't present in the female psyche. Only men are going around violently abusing people like this.
>>83426875This is not research. This is an article written by some nobody with no credentials. The article cites itself as the source and uses some arbitrary measures of the quality of leadership that the author pulled out of her ass. Historically, men have overperformed, leading to the vast majority of merit-based positions as CEOs, high-paying jobs, and government positions being held by men. Not to mention that men in general are responsible for most scientific discoveries. That should be enough evidence for you.
>>83426934Hence you are not, have never been, and never will be effective leaders, let one more effective than men.
>>83426944It's cited to this. https://leadershipcircle.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Research-on-Female-and-Male-Leaders-White-Paper-2022-03-17.pdfYou have different measurements of what leadership means than women do.
>>83426947You think being an effective leader means being able to best instrumentalize a system of imperial, violent abuse. I disagree.
>>83425548that's what girls are there for you fat slut
>>83426934True, unlike you that go around betraying, cheating and scheming. I suppose that because we are violent we can just cut to chase and spare ourselves from unfounded and fake pleasantries.
>>83426957Disagree all you want, until you give us an example of a female created and lead society, you have absolutely nothing to back your claim.
>>83426951Yeah I know, the author cites themselves. My measurements are those of most people: actual real-world success. The representation men have as CEOs, scientists, politicians, and military generals reflects that. This article basically says "according to this metric I agree with, AKSHULLY women are better leaders than men. Let me point you to the source, myself."
>>83426970Why would they not cite their own research? Do you know what original research is?
>>83426975It's just funny since usually people point to reputable institutions when citing a source, not to some pdf they wrote
>>83426988OK, here's the endorsement from reputable institution Forbes https://www.forbes.com/sites/kevinkruse/2023/03/31/new-research-women-more-effective-than-men-in-all-leadership-measures/>Research from Leadership Circle, based on assessments with over 84,000+ leaders and 1.5 million raters (comprising boss, boss's boss, peers, direct reports, and others), shows that female leaders show up more effectively than their male counterparts across every management level and age level.
>>83426988>88nta but I think citing sources is retarded. i think women are bad leaders in some respects because they are more often neurotic with a chip on their shoulders. >"yeah well im a woman in this male dominated field so you have to listen to ME!"shut up hoe >>83427020>Forbes>Reputable InstitutionPick one.
>>83427020has there ever been a company that benefited from electing to choose a female ceo over a male? i can name 3 ventures off the top of my head that chose a woman as their front-runner and it completely decimated their public image and financial future
>>83427026>You have no proof>OK you have proof from a PhD but not from a reputable institution>wait no not that reputable institutionLmao moid
>>83427046do you really think head of state and leader means the same thing you absolute martian?
>>83427053Bro said martian. Go to bed, child.
>>83427020The "source" is still some literally-who group regardless. Their claims rest on some arbitrary metrics they chose, like empathy, (which just so happens to be more present in women) and carelessly attribute that to good leadership. Once again, reality does not reflect it.
>>83427055i'm 34. generally when people say leader they mean someone who is superior in degree to other people in the same stations. Patton is a leader and other generals are less so from a sense perspective. women can be leaders because they can be superior in degree, it's an inevitability. whether they can be heads of state and make the same executive decisions is less clear
>>83427085Oh, right. Because why would anyone want a leader to have something like empathy. Understanding other people is just totally useless to leadership you're right. Doesn't add to effectiveness at all.
>>83427095I wouldn't prioritize in good leadership. Being capable of the job is more important. Any society or organization that prioritizes empathy over performance will perish and others will take their place, potentially by people who have no regard for empathy whatsoever. It's not worth it to entertain these narratives full of lies.
>>83427134You have a cartoonish view of what leadership is, where you think every scenario must be like you're leading a Spartan warrior unit or something.
>>83426875Why are the richest women always getting their money from divorce instead of their own independent companies?The top 20 richest women is full of heiresses and exs, like Bill Gates ex wife or Jeff Bezos's ex wife.If women were better leaders you would think there would be more female billionaires who made money from companies they founded instead of who they divorced or who their daddy was
>>83427259There is no "if". You don't like the result of research with a sample of tens of thousands. So you look for these ways to handwave it.
>>83427281The proof of the pudding is in the eatingWhat is more legitimate as a source of truth, researchers with samples, or the Forbes Top 20?I think the process of peer review in academia biases academics into portraying positions other academics would use, while the richest CEOs have the right mix of talent to reach the peaks of success with humble beginnings. They are competing with millions or billions of other humans trying to become rich and they succeeded. And that pool of top CEOs is overwhelmingly male, though there is some female wannabes like the Theranos Steve Jobs wannabe chick
>>83425548>how do we trust women to lead countries if they can't even take responsibility over their child and abort themGod w*men. Truly the greatest of the God's curse. Living with one is a torture, but so is without them
>>83427309Academics seek positions that would please other academics. It's groupthink. If you want to see it in action a lot of Fauci's emails were leaked, and the emails in January February March of 2020 are fascinating in how they set out the ground rules. What is accepted what is repeated and what is too taboo to ever mention.
>>83427309Good leadership isn't rewarded by the market. You should know this by the fact the market is currently investing the entire GDP into shoving AI chatbots in everyone's faces no one asked for and most people hate having jammed into places they didn't ask for.Oh look at that an example of where empathy might've helped...
>letting a woman run your countrylmao
>>83427352Scrotes will complain about child fuckers running the country and then balk at a woman leader. Guess what she's not diddling kids.
>>83425568The issue is always: MEN
>>83426228Stats are fake cause they hurt my feelings! Men make 98% of all sex offenders
>>83426944Men denied women education, men have been opressing women for millenia so it takes a while for women to catch up
>>83425548I'm literally a pedophile and I can be trusted to not sexually assault a little slut in a skirt. You trust the random men on the street not to physically assault you so don't pretend all men are lustful beasts you stupid whore.
>sexually assault a little girl if she wears a skirtHow old?
>>83425548>>83425740Women likely sexually abuse children more often. It's just not reported. When it is, it's downplayed (e.g. "what a lucky lad"). There are so many stories of female teachers doing that coming up nowadays. When it is shown that they're guilty, they get a slap on the wrist. I saw a case where a mother forced herself on her son's friend, but they reduced her sentence to 2 years, only on the weekends. The reasoning? They couldn't send a mother to prison. She needed to be home to take care of her son.tl;dr: women aren't more trustworthy; they just get away with things more
>>83425548i have the big red ballbag all full swole ballbag red like lobster babe its so big all filled with nut big twl big balls all loaded to fill yo azz babey i love you so much yeahhh fuck in my cock in youre puusey all day
>>83425605okay guys guess the ethnicity of this poster because four immediately popped up in my head
>>83427682Most young girls enjoy being sexually educated by older men.
>>83427448Nah, there are very different categories of both men and women who aren't similar in any way.
>>83425740The only way to trust someone to lead a country is if you have a noose around their neck. Both man and woman are greedy, lying shits.
>>83425548>how do we trust men to lead entire countries if they can't be trusted not to sexually assault a little girl if she wears a skirt?Women are blinded to the delusion they are gaia spirit of the earth.
>>83425548The men with the highest morality are literally ostracized into silence. You reap what you sow.
>>83425548>how can we trust men to be abusive if they can be trusted to be abusive to a little girl if she wears a skirt?Power is inherently abusive. That's how. You're welcome.
OP is a tranny. Dont fall for him.Women yearn for the rape.
>>83427454Categorically false.
