The apophantic disclosure of phenomenal qualia resists algorithmic compression precisely because experiential manifolds instantiate non-ergodic trajectories through state-spaces whose dimensionality remains underdetermined by any extrinsic measurement apparatus--a circumstance homologous to gauge-theoretic indeterminacy in quantum field configurations, wherein holonomic constraints imposed by path integrals yield only equivalence classes of physically indistinguishable yet incommensurable descriptions.This epistemic lacuna ramifies through attempts at psychophysical reduction: the explanatory gap persists structural inevitably rather than contingent ignorance, emerging from the ontological incongruence between intensive magnitudes (thermodynamic-adjacent "feel" of sensation) and extensive properties amenable to third-person metricization. The Hard Problem thus recapitulates, in consciousness studies, what Godel's incompleteness theorems demonstrate for formal systems--that sufficiently complex self-referential structures harbor propositions whose truth-values remain undecidable within their indigenous axiomatics, requiring meta-systemic supplementation that merely displaces rather than resolves the foundational antinomy.Treating neural correlates as necessary-sufficient conditions conflates the diachronic dynamics of causal propagation with the synchronic gestalt of subjective apprehension, neglecting how hierarchical Bayesian inference in cortical microcircuitry implements something functionally equivalent to a Riemannian manifold whose local geodesics (predictive-coding error minimization) generate globally coherent but irreducibly holistic experiential topologies--topologies that supervene upon but remain formally irreducible to their microphysical substrates, much as liquid-phase behavior emerges from molecular interactions while remaining categorically distinct, instantiating novel causal powers unavailable to isolated constituents.
for some reason, i swear i saw the exact phrase "synchronic gestalt" a long time ago on here... or somewhere at leastmaybe its an artifact or some misremembering from a book on the history of string theory i read years ago, i think?or maybe its because you used to post these walls back thenif so, welcome back xdd
deleuze was a mistake
synchronic gestalt
>>83444365This is what trannies sound like when they try to explain how a man can actually be a woman.
>>83444458powder that makes me say "real one"
Can't believe I once took course on this shit just so that my parents wouldn't try to force me to get a job lmao.
Can you expound upon this in ordinary language?
>>83444365>phenomenal qualia resists algorithmic compressionMaterialist explanations for quania have never been able to explain why I'm experiencing reality as this human rather than as something else.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vertiginous_question
>>83444680It's like, difficult to talk about consciousness in a scientific manner, because consciousness is like, immeasurable, or something.
>>83444475>Can't believe I once took course on thisWhat is it called? I want to learn how to write eloquently.
>>83444716That's not eloquent writing, that's just a dense brick of jargon expressing abstractions so far removed from human necessity that they verge on meaningless. It's philosophyslop.
>>83444365Thank you, Faust from Limbus Company.
>>83444731Eloquent. (nta)
>>83444365GROKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKPOSTING
>>83444691>Why does my brain only generate conscious experience of the things that it has access to information about?>IS GREAT MYSTERY!>... Wait, if I say 'Epistemic Lacuna', can that make my dribble sound smart? TIRESOME
>>83444365Lot of big words there for a /r9k post, mate.
