[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/r9k/ - ROBOT9001


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: sein.jpg (1.77 MB, 2592x1936)
1.77 MB
1.77 MB JPG
Anons I know some of you will be mad but I honestly thought Ghostbusters 2 was a pretty good movie. It did some new stuff but didn't stray so far from the heart of the characters that is was whacky.

The other thing we need to keep in mind is that the first one set the bar so high that it's unreasonable to expect the sequel to reach that peak or exceed it. Plus, it's kind of a movie for kids and early teens, it's not meant to cater just to adults.
>>
File: evolution.jpg (94 KB, 513x755)
94 KB
94 KB JPG
Evolution (2001) was a better sequel to Ghostbusters than Ghostbusters II.
>>
>>83444550
Evolution did be a good movie though.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.