Do you want to live under a dictator? Why or why not?
"Reactionary Groyper" is not speaking for everyone kekjust take down that website for indians already
>>83472269No, because I'm not a retarded cuck.
>>83472269>reactionary gryoperlol this is retarded
>>83472269>Do you want to live under a dictator?No.>Why or why not?Because I live in eastern EU and I know how living under a dictator felt, thanks to my parents and my grandparents. It sucked balls. My parents pretty much had no childhood. Anyone who thinks a dictatorship would be good should get shipped to DPRK/Russia/Belarus/China to experience how "well" that works.>inb4 China is richDoesn't mean shit. The Chinese have no privacy, work like a bunch of slaves for not much money and a lot of what they build is of shoddy quality and tends to collapse (like their buildings). China is still a shithole and always will be.
Kikes really managed to brainwash another generation lol
>Gen Z wants to be ruled by a faggot mexicanthey couldn't get lower
>>83472269"Reactionary Groyper" is one of 20 accounts made by a jeet to farm engagement money
>>83472269I want to be the dictator, living under a dictator would mean being a cuck.
>>83472269Why the fuck would I want some retarded catholic spic to rule?
Yes. I like rules and seeing normals get BTFO by jackbooted fascists gets my dick hard.Ideally, though, I'd like to live under a monarchy or even a theocracy. The more insane the rules and the justification for the way they're enforced - the better. A dictatorship is sub-par, because there's no guarantee the next leader won't be some reformist faggot. In a monarchy, the monarch has a very clearly laid-out line of succession, so unless there's an insanely violent nation-wide revolution, the ruling family will stay in power and do whatever they want forever. And that's what I want, because it tickles a part of my brain that likes order and routine.
>>83472269Yes because democracy is a total lie only believed by the goyest of goycattle at this point. Everyone knows the ideal situation is a "good" dictator.
>>83472269Autoritharianism is the only logical power dynamic that works for governing men and directing them to live a good life. Trust me, I would love for it not to be the case
>>83472269>Dictator=tyrantI hate plebs
>>83472269No. Countries ruled by dictators are literally always shitholes and that is not a coincidence.
>>83473130Did you just call the greatest country on earth a shithole, yurocuck.Dont you have a bbc to slobber on?
>>83472269Revealed preferences trump stated preferences. People migrate away from dictatorships to democracies because democracies are objectively superior. Opinions don't matter, actions do. Nobody is willingly moving to Cuba, Eritrea, Egypt, Venezuela etc.
>>83472269lol nick the spic
>>83473149Tbf it's because of the gibs, not because of the freedom to choose your political representation.
>>83472269If he was a good (according my personal standards) dictator then I'd prefer that over everything. It'd be a fantasy country where the average citizen has a lot of personal freedom but the government is very strong and serves the people instead of their own interests. Can't exist in reality.
>>83473203Freedom of choice in politics -> laws that on average favor the general public more than a cabal of the glorious leaders cronies -> wealthier nation -> can afford to gib gibs
>>83473285>Freedom of choice in politics to the uneducated massesEver wonder why all the rich elite own the media?
>>83473285Exactly, people only care about economy, not politics. Then you also could ask if Switzerland would become worse than Nigeria if they turned away from democracy.
>>83473316Because they're rich bro, do you expect hobos to own news stations?
>>83473332>Switzerland would become worse than Nigeria if they turned away from democracyNot overnight, but it clearly would result in worse standards of living over time. It's not a coincidence that Switzerland is both the best and the most democratic country in the world.
>>83472269People, including me, just want a shake-up to this mess of a system we have right now. Maybe not full-on dictatorship, but something that could serve as a splash of cold water to this bureaucratic nightmare state we find ourselves in
>>83473345You're avoiding answering the question. But dont worry, it was rhetorical.
>>83472426This. All this racewar political slop is just about making money for lazy faggots. We live in such a gay timeline. Just wait until the AI bubble bursts when gen x finally admits LLMs are useless plugin tier software. Society needs to become even more cynical about all these "revolutionary" faggot grifters.
>>83473369You're underestimating just how vastly inferior dictatorships are compared to democracies. North Korea is basically Nigeria tier while being right next to developed and prosperous South Korea.
>>83473385>LLMs are uselessMy dick disagrees after the nice morning goon sesh I had with one.
yes. if social atomization, mass unemployment, destabilization of the nation, mass surveillance, all continue, then yes i'll trade freedom for a proper nation, as there is no more freedom. the US government is run by pedophile rapist billionaires like donald trump. at the very least china keeps its capital on a leash. i would defect to china in the event of a war. right now i'm taking chinese lessons and will try to move there in the next decade if the situation does not improve. i have a graduate level degree in a technical field so i'd be prioritized in immigration.
>>83473396Im not, I am not saying anything about the value of said systems anywhere. Is India a democracy, if we go by the economist's democracy index? Is Botswana?