[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/r9k/ - ROBOT9001


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1677120771928372 (1).png (578 KB, 571x729)
578 KB
578 KB PNG
The taboo question nobody wants to touch isn't abortion or suicide but birth itself, because all the other moral dramas start the moment someone is dragged into existence without consent into a life that is terminal from day one, structurally hostile, filled with pain, discouragement and moral compromise, and only made bearable through coping mechanisms, illusions, art, religion, distractions and self-deception. We pretend life is some intrinsic good, that procreation is generous, that motherhood is sacred and that suicide is the ultimate sin, but flip the picture upside down and it's obvious that life is a slow deterioration embedded with death, that having kids is a way to dump this burden onto someone else to give meaning to your own anxiety and that morality itself is sabotaged by scarcity, competition and decay, forcing everyone to become callous just to survive. If being born is already a harm and a manipulation, then continuing to live at any cost isn't automatically noble, and deciding to leave when dignity, autonomy, or ethical agency collapses is a perfectly intelligible response to a rigged condition, especially since most people only endure life by numbing themselves with habits, neuroses, meds, entertainment, and lies until death does the job for them anyway. The "enigma" isn't suicide but why anyone keeps going under extreme misery, and the answer is usually folly, instinct, fear, or illusion, not reason. Suicide doesn't destroy some sacred order, it's already written into being itself as a constant possibility, and the only sane position isn't demanding everyone die now or forbidding it forever, but refusing procreation, living minimally, resisting harm where possible, and staying permanently willing to die if moral or personal dignity demands it, because there is no unconditional duty to stay alive, only a stubborn cultural panic about admitting that life doesn't love us back, even though we desperately love it and wish it could have lasted forever.
>>
>>83478124
Most people want to have kids or don't question the status quo so arguing against having kids makes them question their motivation for having them instead of just doing it.
>>
>>83478124
Anti-Natalists should take their position to its conclusion by killing themselves.
>>
>>83479241
Many of them do.
>>
I want to impose my fickle belief system on you please dont die
>>
>>83478124
>a small hat telling his (((fellow whites))) not to have kids
Imagine my shock
>>
>>83480316
What a shame lol
>>
>>83478124
Nah, your argument reverts back to suicide. Parents have 0 way of knowing if their kids will grow up to be disfunctional or happy with life. If they grow up unhappy, there should be an option to leave, such as assisted suicide.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.