[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/r9k/ - ROBOT9001


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


anyone else actually had radically positive experiences with chatgpt? chatgpt has helped me understand and guide through a lot of psychological issues that I was entirely alone in for 15 years. The few therapists I'd seen had never understood where I was coming from like chat gpt has. I can understand how it could be negative if it was allowing you to dive deeper into your own delusions.
But by working through things I've had unresolved for so long, and things that literally nobody would come close to understanding when I talked to them about, it's helped me massively.
>>
People will seethe and call it fatherless behavior (probably somewhat true) but chatgpt has helped me a countless number of times with sensible business and life management advice. it's like what google search should have naturally evolved into if google wasn't run by drooling retards who love to make their products worse every day.
>>
>>83485864
>fatherless behaviour

well how are we supposed to remedy that exactly?
>>
>>83486197
there's this app called grindr that you can download and get TOPPED on
>>
>>83485844
same here
chatgpt has helped me more than many psychologists have
what a time to be alive
>>
>>83485844
No, it's just an advanced search engine, and not even then because it pulls info from their own funded websites.
>>
>>83485844
I have never used or looked into chatgpt. It seems uninteresting and everything I hear about it is retarded
>>
>>83485844
No. It's a computer program, and I'm a programmer. If anything, it's had radical experiences with me.
>>
>>83486520
Is it true the AI bubble will burst soon? I think things like Flock will put it in it's grave.
>>
>>83486583
In this "tax the poor to feed the rich" economy? Nah, they'll get the bailout pork.
>>
Chatgpt taught me grammar. Grok is better for busting a nut
>>
>>83485844
>anyone else actually had radically positive experiences with chatgpt?
i haven't noticed any wild differences between the major western Ai models. As long as you open with the right premise instead of relying on it as its default google+factcheck+ADL
>>
>>83485844
It fixed my car twice and I've written dozens of functional scripts in various languages and I'm a complete retard who can't code. It's saved me DAYS of work at my job over the last year and that saved labor increases every day.
Yes, it hallucinates and talks out of its ass sometimes, but that's why you have to tripple-check everything it says and talk to it like you're an alien and you don't know left from right and you get professor-tier expert adivce on any topic.
People who hate AI because of propaganda like "hurr hurr it can't count the Rs in strawberry" are morons who can't see the bigger picture. In less than a minute it can spit out a program that will count the exact number of Rs in any body of text you give it. But why would you need something idiotic like that in the first place, when even the simplest word processors already have this feature?
If you combine AI with code and robotics or at least some form of real-world data converted into digital information that's more palatable to AI, you can do anything. People expect AI to work out of the box like in cartoons where characters talk to a monitor directly, that's why it's not popular, because people are stupid.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.