>>83496560
don't know about being better at raising children but my theory is women spend more time with them as whole not just as mothers but as teachers and nursery attendants so there nerves get worse down more over time

>>83496632
>worse
worn

>>83496560
>https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9368669/
>Most of the fathers and almost half of the mothers said that they had always known that they had wanted to be a parent.
>Exact test showed that there was a significant difference between mothers and fathers (p < 0.05), with fathers more likely to state that they had always known and mothers more likely to state an exact age when they had decided they would like to have a baby.

>>83496560
>Are men also better at taking care of children?
Honestly yeah, I think so. Men tend to be less neurotic so we can just have a laugh at children's silliness while women are more likely to freak out over every little thing and try to control them. Probably a culture thing too. Westerners are just really immature as a rule.

>>83497517
Men are less neurotic cause they don't bother looking up what is bad for kids and what is not. Men are fine with feeding their kids with microplastics, covering them with neurotoxins and stuff like that. Men have never read a thing about how children develop so they really think they are not harming the kids.

>>83497934
Women don't really bother reading too much either, they're victims of advertising and think spending money equates to doing something helpful (see: baby formula, fish oils, cruciferous vegetables, therapy)

>>83497934
Why would you conveniently ignore the fact that women are vastly overrepresented when it comes to circumcising babies? It's almost like you're arguing in bad faith because you hate men or something.

>>83498031
Women do read a lot about the topic, its just a fact.
>>83498041
Its a habit made up by men

>>83498116
>NUH UH!!1
Yeah that's pretty much what I expected.

>>83496560
Hi I'm a man and I'm not tolerant of small children at all, hate the little buggers.
#notallmen

>>83498132
Do a little google search which gender reads more? Also you are retarded, during preganacy women are given shit to read cause they need to understand how food they ear affects the baby. Men don't do even this minimal investment (they should)

>>83496560
Men are better at everything. I know a lot of you still believe in that ''women are better caretakers'' cope but it's also not true. Women can't do anything. They are quite literally useless. All they can do is breed. That's it. Everything else is cope.

>>83498158
Men cannot raise babies cause they want to have sex with them. Men should be in jail and prove themselves to get out of there

>>83498152
I'm the guy who mentioned women being extremely overrepresented in mutilating babies. Curious that you would double down on the 'nuh uh' though.

>>83496560
>Are men also better at taking care of children?
Yes
Look at the outcomes of the children of single mothers vs. the children of single fathers

Honestly if we could get trannies boypregnant or fuck robots with wombs, women would be obsolete

>>83498171
>believes the cope
You're either a woman or really retarded.

>>83498171
>>83498177
Having sex with the baby stretches it out, while circumcision removes part of its body. Neither are appropriate from a caretaker's perspective (guardians are meant to keep something/someone SAFE) I'm just examining the overall lifelong cost/benefit tradeoff between rape and circumcision here. It's interesting we differentiate between the two also. Rape has a specific definition and so does circumcision, but rape is not circumcision and circumcision is not rape? Women can understand. They're emotionally numb like the rat utopia rats.

>>83496560
That's something I've thought about for a while now, like how upset people get when a literal baby is crying anywhere near them as if there's anything the parent can do, I feel like a lot of "people" are incapable of true empathy, they are at best capable of performative sympathy.

>>83498228
You know, in hindsight it's not that strange that people raised by boomers were taught that having utter open contempt for young children is normal.

>>83498171
>Men should be in jail and prove themselves to get out of there
Who'd keep them there?
Who'd build and maintain the jails?
When they eventually bust out, because they will, who'd go catch them?

>>83498242
>tries to reason with a retard
Waste of effort, anon.

>>83498198
>Look at the outcomes of the children of single mothers vs. the children of single fathers
When you take wealth in to account, single men do worse as parents. They are often just more wealthy

>>83498198
>Honestly if we could get trannies boypregnant
I hope for this to happens in future. Will be fun when your son would en up trooning out thanks to tranny genes

>>83498210
>Having sex with the baby stretches
It kills the baby.. moids really know nothing of kids

>>83498242
Underground bunker, no way out. They have to perform tests that measure their self control and empathy. Those who fail get permanently removed

>>83498691
And who is gonna build those underground prison bunkers? Who is gonna enforce your gay lil powerfantasy? Who is getting literally anything done? It's not you and your ilk, that's for sure.

>>83498706
Robots. Manpower has been replaced.

>>83498721
And do these robots just magically appear out of thin air? How will you invent and manufacture these supposed robots? You haven't thought about this at all, have you?

>>83498681
Not in all cases, and it greatly varies by size of the stretch. Clamping and knifing their genitalia kills them sometimes too but they're swept under the bureaucratic rug just fine. Your way isn't better, just different.

>>83498656
>When you take wealth in to account, single men do worse as parents.
I'm talking about criminality and mental illnesses