[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/r9k/ - ROBOT9001


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Cuteness-640x381.jpg (34 KB, 640x381)
34 KB
34 KB JPG
If you accept the idea that 20% of men get 80% of women then isn't logical to say that polygymy should be the human default where successful men have multiple wives at once?
>>
That's already happening tho. Vvomen would rather share Chad than give their looksmatch the time of day.
>>
0,05% get 100% of women
>>
>>83504993
Sure, but that still leaves the hard problem of excess men. You want their labor power, you want them to participate in the local economy, but you don't want them to have their basic needs fulfilled. That's a hard sell. Personally, I'm collecting welfare.
>>
>>83505017
>>83504993
Intraspecies parasitism is a hell of a drug, crazy how its just the case but we play charades with each other still
>>
File: 1751220262676592.jpg (172 KB, 591x627)
172 KB
172 KB JPG
>>83505003
Original post
R
I
G
I
N
A
L

P
O
S
T



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.