I have yet to find an argument that explains the aversion to incest everybody seems to have.>it causes genetic deformities!When done for several generations, yes. But breeding between siblings or cousins as a singular isolated event is relatively harmless. Also, for you leftist trannies out there, isn't preventing people from procreating due to potential genetic faults in the child_ Eugenics? >incest is always abusive because of the power dynamics!It is no more harmful than a Boss and coworker relationship. You can integrate those power dynamics healthily through kink or plain communication as well. And in the case of twins, there is no power dynamic.>the westemarck effect!1!!1This study was bad science. The children in it still felt sexual feelings for eachother, but were shamed into not developing relationships. there is no solid proof that humans have an innate natural instinct to avoid incest.There's no reason to hate incest other than the societal pressure to do so. It is programming that you can overcome. Take the alabama pill, anons. It might be the only chance you have to experience sex.
>>83508119You just don't understand the point in verifying such a practice >But breeding between siblings or cousins as a singular isolated event is relatively harmlessThis wouldn't be the case if it wasn't taboo, just look at cultures where first cousin marriage aren't frowned upon.But not only that, the beauty of incest is that it's forbidden, if the possibility of close relative relationships was always a possibility it's meaningless, misleading and grossI have a deep disdain for all incest that isn't twincest
>>83508329>verifyingI meant vilifying
>>83508329You are a fetishist. You condemn cousin marriage and yet you pump your binky dick to twincest. You disgust me. Incest is a practical solution to inceldom depending on your situation, not something that should be fetishized or demonized inherently. It is just like any other relationship.
>>83508119>as a singular isolated event is relatively harmlessAgain, this is the issue, societies typically only have 2 ways of dealing with things: either allowing it or not allowing it. If you "allow" incest, a lot of people are going to do it - if not brother sister or uncle niece or aunt nephew, then certainly cousins - it's just more convenient, you have guarantees of common cultural values. The issue is then that everyone becomes somewhat inbred and clannish over several generations and gets into clan blood feuds over the honor of the clan and blah blah blah. It's a huge problem and one of the reasons for the success of western Europe is not only taboos around incest in the nuclear family but a general taboo around cousin marriage.Believe me, no one's more upset about this then I am, I'd love to knock up an aunt or cousin. But it can't be allowed by policy.Some great romances have featured incest. Siegmund and Sieglinde.
>>83508459This is why the best case scenario is that incest gets accepted by the LGBT. MAGA would keep it illegal or limited which prevents generational issues, but it would socially transition into acceptability via zoomers. They already tried to integrate pedophillia, a much more harmful and deranged practice, so it would not surprise me if this was their next move.
>>83508119Have done it, kids came out fine. But as was already said, if it was an acceptable thing then the problems would increase in a population.
>>83508423>Incest is a practical solution to inceldom>women don't like but my cousin willSure
>>83508119>OP is the creepy uncle at family gatherings who is told to keep the door open whenever he isn't alone in a room with a female family member Hands off your niece OP.
>>83509017I am married, and have no desire to pursue any of my relatives at the moment. Maybe if the right one came along i would, but i am not an incel like most people on this hellsite. Those are the people that should be pursuing incest. Men need sex to be functional members of society.
