Then it is correct to say we should bring back polygymy where men can marry multiple women in the west and maintain that style of life since it appears to be the default of human nature right? It's not some "redpill" it appears to just be how men and women function togetherAs of now we have this game where men will unofficially be with multiple women at once and it is messy. Better to just formalize it and make it acceptable socially.anthropological records indicates that approximately 85 per cent of human societies have permitted men to have more than one wife (polygynous marriage), and both empirical and evolutionary considerations suggest that large absolute differences in wealth should favour more polygynous marriages. Yet, monogamous marriage has spread across Europe, and more recently across the globe, even as absolute wealth differences have expanded.
That makes sense good points here
>>83508627chad doesn't want to commit though, so he benefits from the unofficial status. also were it to be official, it would cause too much tension between chads which is currently avoided by the unofficial nature of their harems
A business owner is able to have more than one employee officially. If this business owner is able to provide for more than one employee and the people are encouraged to work for him then they should be allowed toThere are big businesses that are more successful than small ones and they can even create more competition. We don't limit things to only small business today
They only reason women think they don't want this is because they think they don't have to compete with women if it doesn't exist, but we all know that isn't the case.
this seems to be an idea that has not caught on red pill environments. I think it may have to do with these areas being anti-marriage because they don't see the value and how incongruent it is where benefits women. But if you are to marry under this system, it would make sense. It's beneficial for it to be with multiple women and they are officially yours and women will want men with assets or status then it always has been the caseIf you look through history, it is not a resurgence of a new idea or behavior. It's always been like this. It's just now we have Force monogamy in marriage when it didn't used to be. This way we're trying to go against nature
In what era of human history has this not been the case. People such as like kings emperors and people of high status literally had multiple wives very frequently. Women desired such men. It's human instinct to have a provider a person with high status and as well it could be appearance. If the person is able to provide for them, why not?Right now what we're having is where we essentially creating a prohibition of alcohol and then everybody's drinking alcohol and secret and it does not workSo you have all these things where people have informal relationships which they call like situationships and it has no commitment or growth at all as they jump from person to person instead of just establishing what somebody that is like a provider and then we have more stability in society
>>83508627no what should happen is fornicators get stoned to death and incels should be made the west's spiritual leaders
>>83508627Nah, this is how you get dissatisfied castes of young males who have nothing to lose and everything to gain in a violent uprising. There's a reason you very rarely see widespread polygamy in settled civilized societies
>>83508627the dating market will get somewhat fixed once more pointless wars are started to kill off the excess men when AI keeps making more jobs obsolete and some incels will voluntarily enlist in pursuit of a war bride
>Nah, this is how you get dissatisfied castes of young males who have nothing to lose and everything to gain in a violent uprisingis this something you actually care about or are you just pulling random things out of your asshole so you can have a way to be a snowflake?
>>83508728>People such as like kings emperors and people of high status literally had multiple wives very frequently. Women desired such men.Kings took what they wanted. Women's desires were secondary.
>>83508728>and it has no commitment or growth at all as they jump from person to person instead of just establishing what somebody that is like a provider and then we have more stability in societyAlpha fucks, beta bux. You cant have stability unless you make women property of suppliers.
>>83509035This. You have to be able to offer something to satisfy the 80% of men (and 20% of women) affected, such as suitable sexbots or VR replacements in order to keep society stable.
>>83509049Only thin that could fix it is women rights being taken away. Good news is that will 100% happen either because of white men being sent to die in a war and then men from 3rd world countries will simply take west by force and breed by force taking women rights away. Or white population will dwindle away while muslim population will double, triple, quadruple and their culture where women don't have rights will take over in a "democratic" process. Either way whores lose. It's over for women one way or another. I'm guessing within next 20-50 years men will talk about "women rights" as a fun story that's hard to believe.
>>83508627pareto is sort of right but there are some holes in your thinking>implying chad has the same taste in women as the other chads>chads may or may not lock them down and take them out of the game>chads may not be polygamous>rare cases where one the desirable 80% of the women actually don't want that chad
>>83508627>bring back polygymy where men can marry multiple women in the west and maintain that style of life since it appears to be the default of human natureWhere in human nature is marriage? in human nature is to fuck and thats it lol. Women seek men that has social status and money to provide and are mentally ill to be their cuck. Where men seek women just to impregnate and dip.And theres anomalies because of evolution of intelect where humans get emotions and feelings and in most cases people have relationship untill one of them get different feelings/emotionsAnd few of them are capable to comprehend that those feelings and emotions are not what human reason and being self etc. is and they can control what they do in life and what they can feel etc. btw. because of monogamy europe was capable to expand and colonise whole world. make technological and science wonders etc
>>83508627I know a girl who said eww when a guy 5 years older asked her out and then she ended up having a child out of wedlock with her boss 20 years her senior. She later coped saying it was different because she was over 25. Women make rules for some men and break them for others.
>>83508627anons with seethe at this but its truepolygyny is the default
Adectotally, I used to think hypergamy didn't exist until I found I was able to do it. I'm in a LTR with one woman, and then have a rotating cast of other women (usually between 1-2 other women at once).I break things off with the "extra" women once the relationship gets to a point where they want to meet my friends/family. When we break up, they end up absolutely heartbroken, and the six "other women" I've done this to over the last 2-3 years have not gone on to date since.I'm an immoral guy for doing this, but I can't help myself.
>>83508627previously males had multiple wives because of wealth inequality. chads have harems because of looks inequality. most chads don't have the wealth to maintain multiple wives and their children. that's why it's better for women to sleep around and then settle with betabuxxers who will financially support them and chad's children.
>>83508627Thing is that 150 years ago almost every man was married to a virgin bride in their late teens to early 20s and babies started popping out because there was no birth control. To feed the babies, men worked their ass off and thats why the west far surpassed polyginous societies of the east where more well of men had 3-4 wives while the poorest didn't have a chance to have one. Those men without wives and kids had no motivation. Nowadays the narrative got inverted to to "if you work hard enough, you will be rewarded with a woman who hopefully has a body count under 10". In the past, men got the women first, and started working after (to feed said women and kids). This is why things are falling apart and not because monogamy is le unnatural.
