>>83671121
>a woman who is significantly (more than 1 point) attractive than you
How do you properly judge this?

>>83671121
i only date guys who are singificantly less attractive than me so i disapprove of this message

>>83671141
I think when they're 2 points above you in looks people start to wonder why you're together.
>>83671196
Why do you do that? Seems like a terrible dynamic for a relationship.

my mental health and life prospects knock me from an 7 to a 2 in the minds of most women

>>83671237
Lol same, they don't care that I am 6'1 the moment they find out I have no money, no career and no house.

>>83671244
nta they'd ignore all that if your face was more attractive. and 6'1 is nothing special if you're white

>>83671215
i mean to me it personally seems like the best dynamic. i trust myself to not cheat, i dont trust my partner to not, if im prettier then he'll be less likely to fantasise about hotter women and seek it out elsewhere.

>>83671244
I'm a broke 28 year old and I get women, you just aren't attractive enough

>>83671267
>i trust myself to not cheat, i dont trust my partner to not, if im prettier then he'll be less likely to fantasise about hotter women and seek it out elsewhere.
Uglier men are not less likely to cheat. The smv increase from dating an attractive woman will actually give him more options.

i don't think i have to worry about dating anyone lol

>>83671287
i dont believe in that lol, i dont see why dating an attractive woman would increase ur smv to anything meaningful if you're already considered too ugly to even look at. i think thats true for average men maybe, men with decent social circles. not isolated ugly guys

>>83671344
Yeah and do you think she's finding isolated lonely 2/10 guys? The guys she considers ugly are just average normie dudes.

>>83671121
Unless you're a normie who did nothing but coping all your life, then one more reason thing to cope for won't be a problem