[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/r9k/ - ROBOT9001


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_4064.jpg (234 KB, 1200x1124)
234 KB
234 KB JPG
obviously there's characters who are children/look like children, the lolis, those are obviously wrong to sexualize. But then you have like the Sonic characters, Sega got rid of their ages a while ago, so they're ageless adults now. But some people still consider them teenagers, and I don't want to look like a diddyblud so despite their now adult age I guess I can't sexualize them? And then there's ones I think are wrong but everyone sexualizes anyway, Raven from Teen Titans. She's obviously a teenager yet people still sexualize her, so why is that ok? Back when I was a teenager, fandoms had the concept of "aging up characters" where they're rewritten to be adults, but I never see that done anymore. Is that no longer allowed?

part of me almost misses the days when none of it mattered but I know that's wrong, it's just so confusing now and theres bigger consequences for making an oopsie. I mean thats good since it keeps lolicons down but damn.
>>
>>83671724
>I don't want to look like a diddyblud
i have bad news for you, this is 4chan
>>
I should also clarify, it's less so confusing because of who I want to sexualize and more so because of who I'm cool with associating with. I don't want to be friends with anyone people consider a pedo-adjacent freak but I'm so confused on what people consider that now
>>
>>83671734
I know SOME weirdos are here but thats not everyone!
>>
All characters made for children shows are children
>>
It's different when they never show their parents, I mean isn't Tails like 8 and he's fighting people trying to kill him and his friends?
>>
>>83671816
Not really true no. Consider the dad from Bluey.
>>83671823
Yes he is supposed to be roughly 8 so it would be wrong to sexualize him. They dont really have ages anymore just age groups.
>>
>>83671724
My friends call me diddyblud. Who gives a fuck brah why are some of you guys such pussies?
>>
>>83672242
I mean its not ideal to be called a pedophile
>>
File: 1553919613520 (1).jpg (50 KB, 538x639)
50 KB
50 KB JPG
>>83671724
They're fictional, nigga. Having romantic feelings for a fictional character already makes you a fucking weirdo loser so it's not like there's some reputation to salvage from it.
If you want to be a so-called "ethical gooner" regardless, there are indeed people in real life whom look younger than their actual age(I meet them at uni) but twittertards probably wouldn't care about that excuse anyways since they can only perceive age as "literal child" or "37 year old woman".
My wife Houston btw
>>
>>83673508
>But twittertards probably wouldnt care
Thats literally the issue. I dont want to look like a pedo to anyone.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.