obviously there's characters who are children/look like children, the lolis, those are obviously wrong to sexualize. But then you have like the Sonic characters, Sega got rid of their ages a while ago, so they're ageless adults now. But some people still consider them teenagers, and I don't want to look like a diddyblud so despite their now adult age I guess I can't sexualize them? And then there's ones I think are wrong but everyone sexualizes anyway, Raven from Teen Titans. She's obviously a teenager yet people still sexualize her, so why is that ok? Back when I was a teenager, fandoms had the concept of "aging up characters" where they're rewritten to be adults, but I never see that done anymore. Is that no longer allowed?part of me almost misses the days when none of it mattered but I know that's wrong, it's just so confusing now and theres bigger consequences for making an oopsie. I mean thats good since it keeps lolicons down but damn.
>>83671724>I don't want to look like a diddybludi have bad news for you, this is 4chan
I should also clarify, it's less so confusing because of who I want to sexualize and more so because of who I'm cool with associating with. I don't want to be friends with anyone people consider a pedo-adjacent freak but I'm so confused on what people consider that now
>>83671734I know SOME weirdos are here but thats not everyone!
All characters made for children shows are children
It's different when they never show their parents, I mean isn't Tails like 8 and he's fighting people trying to kill him and his friends?
>>83671816Not really true no. Consider the dad from Bluey.>>83671823Yes he is supposed to be roughly 8 so it would be wrong to sexualize him. They dont really have ages anymore just age groups.
>>83671724My friends call me diddyblud. Who gives a fuck brah why are some of you guys such pussies?
>>83672242I mean its not ideal to be called a pedophile
>>83671724They're fictional, nigga. Having romantic feelings for a fictional character already makes you a fucking weirdo loser so it's not like there's some reputation to salvage from it.If you want to be a so-called "ethical gooner" regardless, there are indeed people in real life whom look younger than their actual age(I meet them at uni) but twittertards probably wouldn't care about that excuse anyways since they can only perceive age as "literal child" or "37 year old woman".My wife Houston btw
>>83673508>But twittertards probably wouldnt careThats literally the issue. I dont want to look like a pedo to anyone.