Where did the beauty standards are subjective cope come from? There are no recessed and dysgenic looking people depicted in ancient sculptures at least as heroic figures.
>>83672215Modern invention to help average people cope with being ugly
>>83672215>There are no recessed and dysgenic looking people depicted in ancient sculptures at least as heroic figures.people want their respected figures to look pretty? I guess lenin was a balding jew or some random roman senator being an old guy if you really meant ancient by ancient
>>83672302>blithering ESL can't post coherentlyGet off the White net.
>>83672302The point is that there is objective attractiveness, inherent attractiveness biologically, not culturally.
>>83672314my internet now, boyanyway the expression "beauty standards" by itself implies some reference of what is beautifulquestion means less and less the more I think about it
>>83672345>objective>biologically>not culturallymaybe, but what does it change, considering that you can't rip the culture out of anyone?
>>83672215High cheekbones, forwards grown face, straight nose, highly defined jaw, these are the main things.
>>83672423Thick head of hair too generally
>>83672215like >>83672251 anon said, it's just a cope for modern folks to feel better about themselvesWe've always been part of the peasantry, anonsAnd peasants are almost always ugly-looking folks
>>83672215modern beauty standards are based on what u need to spend the most money on to achieve
>>83672523is this another attempt of throwing around vague theories about past to feel the quick pleasure of self-pity?I give bonus points for the "sad but true" sentiment
>>83672554>self pitywhat? I'm not ugly, my dude I just look like my parentsand if they managed to bang then I've got a chance
>>83672573>We've always been part of the peasantry>And peasants are almost always ugly-looking folksunder the assumption that you're the "almost" in "almost always", nothing really changesdramatic narrations, all of that, truth is only the plot device
>>83672215The 230 bc sculpture is a gaul
>>83672215beauty standards ARE subjective. women today probably wouldn't find these maya guys attractive.but that doesn't mean there aren't certain traits that are universally attractiveclear skin and symmetrical features are desired everywhere
>>83673312beauty standards being different for people of different ancestry doesn't make them subjective.
>>83672215>Where did the beauty standards are subjective cope come from?Beauty standards are subjective, and they're created by influential perverts.
>>83673325is that not what subjective means or am i misunderstanding the word
>>83672215>Where did the beauty standards are subjective cope come from?it comes from specific standards that existed for specific features. like in modern society big asses are seen as erotic where skinny, nubile women were more favorable 100 years ago.corsetage or circumcision are another good example of unnatural socially enforced beauty standards.
>>83673312We don't know what attractive maya men looked like. Those are creations by hollywood jews. Regardless we know that like in every culture they had strong facial bone development.
>>83673339honestly, treat "subjective" as "mentally conditioned"considering that this is /r9k/, people usually talk about it to explain why they undeservingly suffer because chin is too narrow o algo
>>83672302The majority of early renaissance and medieval art featured recessed and dysgenic looking people.
>>83674191Albert Durer based his drawings more on real people instead of ideals
>>83674218There are no depictions of Adam and Eve that were supposed to be something other than ideals.
>>83672215The 230BC one was not supposed to be "good looking" by the way, he's supposed to be purposely disheveled because he's a germanic barbarian, who were enemies of the Greeks
>>83674302He may be disheveled but he was still meant to show a proud warrior dying, a masculine guy.
>>83672215mostly ugly and fat black women coping that we was queenz in shit
>>83674335>>83674302The Insubres and the Boii wore trousers and light cloaks, but the Gaesatae, in their love of glory and defiant spirit, had thrown off their garments and taken up their position in front of the whole army naked and wearing nothing but their arms... The appearance of these naked warriors was a terrifying spectacle, for they were all men of splendid physique and in the prime of life.-_Polybius, Histories II.28
Drugs IoI, they dont know better. Those are really boring statues statue of david is cool because its 17 feet tall and in a massive dome
PSL simplified the entire world, politics and history for meit's literally just about having a well developed facial structure, that's the only thing that really matters for a human being
>>83674352the life of a germanic warrior back then must have been absolutely peakthey were relatively tall for the era (5'9 average) and could just go around fucking stacys and fighting romans for their whole lives, dying gloriously in battle and meeting their germanic godswhat a shit life we live in comparison
>>83674302Greek sculptures are intentionally idealized figures. They're not realistic depictions of people the way Roman sculptures are. Greeks and Romans both idealized and glorified their enemies and made them out to be gigachads, because you look better when you defeat an objectively prime and ideal specimen than you do when you defeat an ugly dysgenic worm person. All the Trojans in the Illiad were made out to be gigachads.
Theyre cool theyre really toned down, theyre really easy to appreciate in person, modern art is better online and in print
